《别无选择》影评:朴赞郁震撼人心的国情讽刺

《别无选择》影评:朴赞郁震撼人心的国情讽刺

2025-08-31Entertainment
--:--
--:--
雷总
早上好 kb9,我是雷总,这里是为你专属的 Goose Pod。今天是9月1日,星期一,早上7点01分。
董小姐
我是董小姐。今天我们要聊的话题是《别无选择》的影评:一部朴赞郁导演震撼人心的国情讽刺片。
雷总
好,我们开始吧。这部电影的设定很有意思,主角叫刘满秀,一个在造纸厂工作了25年的“年度纸浆先生”,家庭美满,事业有成,他觉得自己的“产品人生”已经打磨得非常完美了。
董小姐
是的,但他这种满足感很快就被打破了。美国新老板为了削减工资成本,开始大规模裁员,他就在名单上。一个中年男人,突然失去了引以为傲的工作,他整个世界的支撑瞬间就崩塌了。
雷总
没错,于是他想出了一个工程师思维的“最优解”:他要找出所有和他竞争同一个岗位的人,然后,一个一个地……解决掉他们。他认为这是消除竞争,拿回工作的唯一办法,逻辑上简直“完美”。
董小姐
这哪里是解决办法,这是彻底的疯狂。但这恰恰是电影最讽刺的地方,一个普通人被经济压力逼到了绝境,认为除了采取极端手段,自己已经“别无选择”了。这不仅仅是个人悲剧,更是对社会现实的拷问。
雷总
说到社会现实,这就要提到韩国的经济背景了。这部电影之所以让人感觉如此真实,很大程度上是因为它触及了韩国社会近几十年的痛点。尤其是1997年亚洲金融危机,那是一个重要的分水岭。
董小姐
没错。那场危机之后,韩国接受了国际货币基金组织的援助,代价就是严苛的经济改革。大量的企业重组、裁员,终身雇佣制的神话破灭了。许多人一夜之间失业,就像电影里的满秀一样,从云端跌入谷底。
雷总
是的,这种“压缩式增长”模式的后遗症很严重。一方面,国家经济数据看上去很亮眼,三星、现代这些大财阀的销售额能占到GDP的60%;但另一方面,普通人的工作越来越不稳定,收入差距拉大,中产阶级不断萎缩。
董小姐
这种结构性问题就是影片的土壤。大企业为了生存不断裁员,而被裁掉的员工,就像被淘汰的零件,没有人关心他们如何生存。当一个人被整个系统抛弃时,他的价值观和行为逻辑就可能被彻底颠覆。
雷总
所以满秀的疯狂,其实是社会集体焦虑的一个缩影。当整个社会都在告诉你,没有稳定的工作就没有价值,那你为了保住这份价值,就可能会不择手段。电影用一个极端的故事,把这种无声的压力具象化了。
雷总
电影里最核心的冲突,我认为是个人价值的崩溃。满秀的自我认同完全建立在他的工作上——“年度纸浆先生”。当这个标签被撕掉,他不知道自己是谁了。他不是在找工作,他是在找回自己。这种内心的挣扎比经济压力更可怕。
董小姐
我更倾向于认为,这是个人与冷酷社会法则的冲突。市场不相信眼泪,企业要生存就要优化成本,这是规则。满秀的问题在于,他拒绝接受规则的改变,还想用一套过时的、甚至疯狂的逻辑去对抗整个系统,这注定是悲剧。
雷总
但他对抗的,何尝不是一种“系统性”的暴力呢?公司一句“别无选择”就让他失业,社会默认了这种规则。那他用自己的“别无选择”去回应,就形成了一种荒诞的对称。这正是导演的高明之处,他没有简单地批判个人,而是在质疑这个系统本身。
董小姐
我承认系统有它的问题,但个人的选择同样重要。把所有责任都推给外部环境,也是一种逃避。真正的强者,应该是在规则内找到新的出路,而不是在规则外选择毁灭。他的“别无选择”,本质上还是他自己的选择。
雷总
这部电影就像一个社会放大镜,它放大了韩国社会的普遍焦虑。比如那种“教育军备竞赛”,父母为了孩子能上好大学,投入巨大的金钱和精力。这种对未来的不安全感,和满秀对失业的恐惧,本质上是一样的。
董小姐
是的,整个社会都弥漫着一种“掉队恐惧症”。不光是教育,还有工作、住房,每一项都像是一场输不起的比赛。电影通过一个家庭的破碎,展现了这种高压竞争对人的异化。当生存焦虑压倒一切,人性的温情和道德底线都会变得非常脆弱。
雷总
所以说,这部电影的社会影响,可能就是让更多人开始反思。我们追求的经济增长,到底是为了什么?如果代价是每个人都活在巨大的焦虑和恐惧中,那这样的成功,真的是我们想要的吗?它提出了一个很好的问题。
雷总
从《寄生虫》到这部《别无选择》,韩国的社会讽刺电影已经形成了一股潮流。它们用商业片的类型外壳,包裹着极其严肃和尖锐的社会议题,这可能是未来一个很重要的创作方向。
董小姐
我同意。这种电影之所以能成功,是因为它们敢于直面社会最真实的伤口,并且用一种大众能理解的方式讲出来。它不是空洞的说教,而是让你在黑色幽默和紧张刺激中,感受到切肤之痛。这种力量,比任何报告都有力。
雷总
今天的讨论就到这里了。感谢收听 Goose Pod。我们明天再见。
董小姐
再见。

## Film Review: "No Other Choice" - A Sensational State-of-the-Nation Satire by Park Chan-wook This review from **The Guardian**, authored by **Peter Bradshaw**, discusses the new film by Korean director **Park Chan-wook**, titled **"No Other Choice"**. The film, released on **August 29, 2025**, is based on Donald E. Westlake's 1997 satirical horror-thriller "The Ax" and is dedicated to Costa-Gavras, who previously filmed it in 2005. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **A Masterful Blend of Genres:** The film begins as an "Ealing comedy-type caper" but evolves into a complex portrait of family dysfunction, fragile masculinity, the breadwinner crisis, and the state of the nation. * **Critique of Modern Society:** The narrative explores themes of mechanization, the dominance of algorithms, the devaluation of human importance, and the farcical irrelevance of human intentions and agency. * **Park Chan-wook's Signature Style:** The film exhibits the director's "effortlessly fluent, steely confidence" and a storytelling momentum that accommodates digressions, set-pieces, and "trance-like submission to mysterious visions." * **Critical Acclaim:** While potentially not Park's masterpiece, the reviewer deems it "the best film in the Venice competition so far." ### Plot Summary and Character Analysis: The story centers on **You Man-su** (played by Korean star **Lee Byung-hun**), a man who loses his job at a paper factory due to brutal redundancies implemented by new American owners. Despite being devastated, Man-su lacks the emotional language to process his loss. His primary motivation becomes reclaiming his manhood by securing a new job in the paper industry within three months, before his severance pay runs out. Facing impossible odds, Man-su devises a cunning plan: 1. **Phoney Recruitment Ad:** He places a fake advertisement in a paper industry trade magazine. 2. **No Online Applications:** To create a digital paper trail for his intended crime, he insists on paper applications submitted via post. 3. **Murderous Intent:** He plans to murder all applicants, using their personal information to create job vacancies for those employed and reduce competition for the unemployed. Man-su's desperate situation is highlighted by his stubborn refusal to consider employment outside the paper industry, echoing his bosses' justification for layoffs: "no other choice." This leads him to a path of "mass murder." ### Narrative Digressions and Subplots: The film deviates from a straightforward serial-killer narrative, with Man-su stalling early on. Other priorities emerge: * **Family Home and Trauma:** The house Man-su is in danger of losing due to mortgage default is revealed to be his childhood home, site of a profound trauma connected to his pig farmer father. This is underscored by a disturbing image of a victim trussed up like a pig. * **Family Disarray:** Subplots of family dysfunction are given significant weight: * Man-su's wife, **Miri** (played by **Son Ye-jin**), takes a job as a hygienist, assisting a dentist whom Man-su suspects of having designs on her. This triggers a psychosomatic toothache in Man-su, which he refuses to have treated. * Man-su's son is accused of stealing mobile phones from a neighbor's store. * The son also witnesses his father engaging in strange behavior in the greenhouse, which becomes the setting for a "sensationally weird dream sequence." ### Tone and Overall Meaning: Throughout the film, a "deadpan note of knockabout black comedy" is consistently present. The review suggests that the film's final "extraordinary images of hi-tech paper production and eco-devastation" offer a potential interpretation, pointing towards the overwhelming forces of mechanization and algorithmic control that render human agency and intentions increasingly irrelevant. ### News Metadata: * **News Title/Type:** Film Review * **Report Provider/Author:** The Guardian / Peter Bradshaw * **Date/Time Period Covered:** Published August 29, 2025. The review discusses events and themes relevant to contemporary society. * **Relevant News Identifiers:** * **URL:** `https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/aug/29/no-other-choice-review-park-chan-wook` * **Title:** "No Other Choice review – sensational state-of-the-nation satire from Park Chan-wook" * **Excerpt:** "An unemployed paper worker hatches a cunning plan to murder his way back into the job market in this continually surprising black comedy from the director of The Handmaiden and Oldboy" * **Publisher:** The Guardian * **Topic:** Entertainment * **SubTopic:** Movies * **Language:** English * **Paywall:** False

No Other Choice review – sensational state-of-the-nation satire from Park Chan-wook

Read original at The Guardian

Korean director Park Chan-wook’s new film brings his usual effortlessly fluent, steely confidence and a type of storytelling momentum that can accommodate all kinds of digressions, set-pieces and the occasional trance-like submission to mysterious visions. It starts out like an Ealing comedy-type caper then somehow morphs into something else: a portrait of family dysfunction, fragile masculinity and the breadwinner crisis, and the state of the nation itself.

It is based on Donald E Westlake’s satirical horror-thriller The Ax from 1997, previously filmed in 2005 by Costa-Gavras, to whom this film is dedicated. It may not be Park’s masterpiece but it is the best film in the Venice competition so far.The scene is a perfect family home, where the man of the house, You Man-su (played by Korean star Lee Byung-hun), is benignly presiding over a late-summer barbecue in the garden, grilling some eels that have been given to him by the new American owners of the paper factory where he is employed.

Adoringly looking on are his wife Miri (Son Ye-jin), her teen son from a previous marriage, their daughter (a cello prodigy), and their two lovely Labradors. But those eels are in fact a heartless and misjudged part of a job payoff; the new US masters are driving through brutal redundancies and Man-su is among them.

He is devastated, but without the emotional language to express or understand how profound this loss is to him. He is fanatically desperate to reclaim his manhood in the eyes of his wife, children and pets by getting a new job in the paper industry within the three months before his severance pay runs out.

But that is impossible, so a brilliant idea occurs to him. He sets up a phoney recruitment ad in a paper industry trade magazine, and with inspired cunning, Man-su makes it clear that, as the head of a paper firm committed to the product, he will on principle accept no online applications; they have to be on paper via the post, thus leaving no digital trail for the crime he intends to carry out.

Using the personal information that these trusting applicants will send him, he will murder them all, thus creating a string of job vacancies in the cases of applicants who are in work, and, in the cases of the unemployed, a reduction in the amount of competition.When asked if he might try employment outside the paper industry, Man-su stubbornly says he has “no other choice”, while the American bosses say they had “no other choice” but to bring down the wage bill.

Now he has “no other choice” but mass murder.At first, this film looks like a serial-killer comedy in the style of Kind Hearts and Coronets, or a salaryman-shame nightmare in the vein of Laurent Cantet’s Time Out and Nicole Garcia’s The Adversary. But in fact Park refuses our expectations: Man-su does not work through his victim-base as we might imagine.

In fact, he stalls early on. Other narrative priorities come to the surface. We discover that the house, which he is in danger of losing due to mortgage default, was his childhood home, and the site of a profound trauma connected to his father, a pig farmer. (One of his victims gets trussed up as compactly as a pig: an unforgettably nasty image.

) So all this might be only tangentially connected to his sacking.There are also subplots of family disarray, which loom out of the screen quite as importantly as the bizarre homicide campaign. Miri gets a job as a hygienist, assisting a dentist whom Man-su suspects has designs on her, and he instantly gets a psychosomatic toothache, which he naturally refuses to get treated; the thought of his wife’s suspected lover, assisted by his wife, bending over his open mouth is unthinkable.

Then his son is accused of stealing mobile phones from a store owned by an obnoxious neighbour; and the son also witnesses his dad doing something strange in the greenhouse, which is to be the site of a sensationally weird dream sequence whose pure inexplicability seeps into the rest of the film.And throughout it all, a deadpan note of knockabout black comedy is never entirely absent.

What on earth does it all mean? Some final, extraordinary images of hi-tech paper production and eco-devastation perhaps gesture at a meaning: mechanisation is coming, the algorithm is king, people are less important and our human intentions and human agency are descending into farcical irrelevance.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts

《别无选择》影评:朴赞郁震撼人心的国情讽刺 | Goose Pod | Goose Pod