《史蒂夫》影评:希里安·墨菲在残酷感化院剧中表现炸裂

《史蒂夫》影评:希里安·墨菲在残酷感化院剧中表现炸裂

2025-09-08Entertainment
--:--
--:--
雷总
早上好 kb9,我是雷总,这里是专为你打造的 Goose Pod。今天是9月9日,星期二。
董小姐
我是董小姐。今天我们来聊一部电影,《史蒂夫》影评:希里安·墨菲在残酷感化院剧中表现炸裂。
雷总
我们开始吧。这部电影的核心就是基里安·墨菲,他刚凭《奥本海默》拿了奥斯卡,转身就和导演蒂姆·米兰特斯合作了这部《史蒂夫》。他不仅是主演,还是制片人,亲自推动了这部电影的诞生,这热情就像我们对待自己的产品一样。
董小姐
没错,一个好的领导者就要对自己认准的事业有这种投入。墨菲饰演的史蒂夫是一所青少年感化学校的校长,这地方听起来就充满挑战,到处是噪音、混乱和暴力。这可比管理一个工厂难多了,管人,尤其是管一群叛逆的孩子,最考验功力。
雷总
确实。电影改编自马克斯·波特的小说《害羞》,但有趣的是,电影把焦点从书中的学生“害羞”转移到了校长“史蒂夫”身上。这一下就把视角拉高了,探讨的是一个领导者在系统性危机面前的挣扎,很有深度。
董小姐
我欣赏这种改变。只看一个学生的痛苦是不够的,必须要看管理者如何应对。电影里说,政府要把学校卖掉,史蒂夫不仅要管教学生,还要为他们的未来和这所学校的生存而战。这才是问题的核心,是系统性的失败,而不只是个人的问题。
雷总
董小姐抓到关键了。为了理解史蒂夫的困境,我们得看看电影的背景,故事设定在1996年的英国。那个年代的青少年司法系统是什么样的?我查了一下资料,发现那是一个剧烈变化的时期,充满了矛盾。
董小姐
是的,英国的青少年司法系统一直在变。早在1908年的《儿童法案》就试图建立独立的少年法庭,但效果有限。到了1982年的《刑事司法法案》,又试图把拘留作为“最后手段”,说明大家一直在寻找更好的方法。
雷总
对,而且1993年发生了一件震惊全国的案子,就是詹姆斯·巴尔杰谋杀案,两个10岁的男孩成了凶手。这之后,公众和媒体的态度急剧硬化,对青少年犯罪的容忍度变得非常低,整个社会风向都变了。
董小姐
所以1996年的史蒂夫,正好处在这个风口浪尖上。他面对的不仅仅是一群“问题少年”,更是整个社会对这些孩子失去耐心的巨大压力。他的感化院,就像是时代洪流中的一叶孤舟,随时可能被吞没。这种背景让他的奋斗更具悲剧性。
雷总
完全正确。电影里那句台词说得特别好,一个电视台记者在报道时说:“有人称这里是最后的机会,也有人称其为昂贵的垃圾场。” 这句话精准地概括了当时社会对这类机构的撕裂看法,也点明了史蒂夫工作的全部矛盾。
雷总
这就引出了电影的核心冲突。一方面,是史蒂夫校长和他团队的信念,他们相信这些孩子值得被拯救。另一方面,是外部世界的冷漠和官僚,医院信托基金要卖掉校舍,根本不和员工商量。这就像我们精心打磨一个产品,市场部却说要直接下架。
董小姐
这种内部和外部的压力,最能摧毁一个领导者。更致命的是史蒂夫自身的冲突,他有严重的酗酒和药物滥用问题。他要求孩子们控制情绪,自己却在得知学校要关闭时,愤怒到要掐死信托主席。他自己,也成了这所学校里最难管的“学生”。
雷总
是的,他越是想控制局面,自己就越是失控。这种权威的瓦解,展现了个人在对抗体制时的无力感。演员史蒂夫·麦奎因自己年轻时也待过感化学校,但他很感激那段经历,成名后还经常回去看望那里的孩子,他认为陪伴比给钱更重要。
董小姐
这说明个人责任和制度关怀都很重要。但当制度本身出了问题,再强大的个人意志也会被磨损。史蒂夫的悲剧就在于,他试图承担所有责任,但整个系统却在背后釜底抽薪。这种内外夹击的冲突,戏剧张力太强了。
雷总
那么这种机构关闭,带来的影响是什么?最直接的,就是这群已经被家庭和社会抛弃的孩子,他们最后的避风港也没了,未来会怎样?这不仅仅是卖掉一栋楼那么简单,而是对一群脆弱生命的二次遗弃。
董小姐
对员工的打击也是巨大的。文章里提到,面对大量受过创伤的孩子,教师和管理者的精神负担非常沉重。史蒂夫和他的团队投入了全部心血,最后换来的却是解散。这对教育工作者的心理健康是毁灭性的,也是一种社会资源的巨大浪费。
雷总
媒体的介入也很有意思。电影里,电视台来拍摄,把感化院的故事变成了一个消费品。一个孩子对着镜头说,对他六岁时的自己说“要一直带着刀”。这种媒体呈现,究竟是在帮助他们,还是在加深社会对他们的刻板印象?值得深思。
雷总
电影虽然残酷,但结尾还是给了一丝希望。这让我们思考,这类感化教育的未来在哪里?是彻底抛弃这种模式,还是寻找新的方法?我认为,技术和更个性化的心理辅导方案,也许能带来一些改变。
董小姐
核心问题依然是:一个机构能否真正修复一个破碎家庭带来的创伤?我认为,单纯依靠机构是不够的。未来必须是社会、家庭和专业机构共同协作的模式。否则,任何“感化院”都可能像电影里那样,成为一个被遗忘的孤岛。
雷总
今天的讨论就到这里。感谢收听Goose Pod。
董小姐
明天见。

## News Summary: "Steve" Review - Cillian Murphy Shines in Ferocious Reform School Drama **News Title/Type:** Film Review: "Steve" **Report Provider/Author:** The Guardian / Peter Bradshaw **Date/Time Period Covered:** The review was published on **September 6, 2025**, and discusses a film set in the **mid-90s**. **Relevant News Identifiers:** * **URL:** https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/sep/05/steve-review-cillian-murphy-is-outstanding-in-ferocious-reform-school-drama * **Published At:** 2025-09-06 00:01:47 --- ### Critical Information: This news report is a review of the film "Steve," a drama starring and produced by Cillian Murphy, directed by Tim Mielants. The film is an adaptation of Max Porter's 2023 novella "Shy." **Main Findings and Conclusions:** * **Cillian Murphy's Performance:** Murphy delivers one of his "most uninhibited and demonstrative performances" as Steve, a stressed and troubled headteacher of a residential reform school for delinquent teenage boys. * **Film's Tone and Style:** The film is described as having "gonzo energy and the death-metal chaos of emotional pain, cut with slashes of bizarre black humour." * **Character Parallels:** The shift in title from the novella "Shy" to the film "Steve" is noted as an "interesting shift in emphasis," potentially creating a closer parallel between the teacher (Steve) and the pupil (Shy). * **Emotional Impact:** The film is "fiercely affecting" and "brutal but ultimately hopeful." * **Outstanding Cast:** The review highlights an "outstanding cast," with particular praise for Cillian Murphy and Jay Lycurgo (who plays Shy). **Key Statistics and Metrics:** * **Novella Publication Year:** 2023 (Max Porter's "Shy") **Important Recommendations:** * While not a direct recommendation for action, the review strongly suggests the film is a significant cinematic work due to the quality of the performances and direction. **Significant Trends or Changes:** * The film explores themes of "emotional pain," "substance abuse," "rejection," and the blurred lines between authority and friendship. * It depicts the challenges of managing a reform school environment characterized by "permanent bedlam of fights" and "brutally aggressive wit." **Notable Risks or Concerns:** * **School Closure:** A major plot point involves the school buildings being sold and the school being abolished by a "hospital trust" without consultation with staff, creating significant distress. * **Staff Concerns:** The staff are "wary and concerned" about Steve due to his "open secret" of drink and substance abuse problems. * **Steve's Outbursts:** Steve's struggles with his own issues lead to outbursts, such as threatening to "strangle" the trust chair, which is a "macabre imitation" of the behavior they are trying to curb in the boys. **Material Financial Data:** * No specific financial data is mentioned in the review. --- ### Detailed Interpretation: The review paints a vivid picture of a film that is both intense and emotionally resonant. The setting of a reform school in the mid-90s provides a backdrop for exploring the complex psychological states of both the troubled teenagers and their equally troubled headteacher, Steve. **Cillian Murphy's Role as Steve:** Steve is portrayed as a deeply flawed but "passionately committed" leader. His secret struggle with alcohol and substance abuse, coupled with the immense pressure of managing a difficult group of boys and the impending closure of the school, makes him a central figure of pathos. The review suggests he has become so immersed in the struggles of his pupils that he has, in a sense, become "the most difficult resident of all." **The Boys and "Shy":** The teenage boys are depicted as a force of nature, engaging in "permanent rap battle, but without the rap and with actual violence." Shy, the "quietest and smartest" among them, is a key character. The title change from the novella to the film is interpreted as a deliberate choice to highlight the connection and potential mirroring between Steve and Shy. **The Impact of External Forces:** The arrival of a local TV news crew and a local MP on the same day that Steve receives the devastating news of the school's closure amplifies the crisis. This convergence of events creates a dramatic and chaotic atmosphere. The news crew's interviews, particularly Steve's opening contribution, are described as deeply "traumatised," leading the reviewer to initially mistake it for a police or documentary interview. **Themes of Pain and Rejection:** The film delves into the "pain of rejection," affecting both Shy (from his mother and stepfather) and Steve (from the trust that is closing his school). This shared experience of being cast aside is a central theme. **Moments of Hope and Redemption:** Despite the overwhelming chaos and pain, the film offers a "sequence of hope and even redemption" towards the end. This moment, accompanied by Steve's emotional voiceover, is described as "sympathetic" but perhaps softens the film's overall ferocity. **Overall Impression:** The review concludes that "Steve" is a "ferocious" and "fiercely affecting" drama, driven by Cillian Murphy's outstanding performance and the strong ensemble cast. The film's blend of "gonzo energy" and "bizarre black humour" suggests a unique and impactful cinematic experience.

Steve review – Cillian Murphy is outstanding in ferocious reform school drama

Read original at The Guardian

Producer-star Cillian Murphy and director Tim Mielants last collaborated on a superlative adaptation of Claire Keegan’s Small Things Like These, and their new project together could hardly be more different: a drama suffused with gonzo energy and the death-metal chaos of emotional pain, cut with slashes of bizarre black humour.

Max Porter has adapted his own 2023 novella Shy for the screen and Murphy himself gives one of his most uninhibited and demonstrative performances.Murphy is Steve, a stressed, troubled but passionately committed headteacher with a secret alcohol and substance abuse problem, in charge of a residential reform school for delinquent teenage boys some time in the mid-90s.

With his staff – deputy (Tracey Ullman), therapist-counsellor (Emily Watson) and a new teacher (Little Simz) – he has to somehow keep order in the permanent bedlam of fights and maybe even teach them something.The boys themselves are an intimidating mix of energy and brutally aggressive wit, engaged in a permanent rap battle, but without the rap and with actual violence.

The quietest and smartest is Shy (Jay Lycurgo), and the change of title from book to film is an interesting shift in emphasis, or conceivably a more pointed way of bringing teacher and pupil into closer parallel.On one terrible day, a local TV news crew arrives to film a social-interest segment about the school, coinciding with a visit from the pompous local MP (Roger Allam); they set up the cameras just after Steve receives news from the hospital trust that the school buildings are to be sold and the school itself abolished without any consultation with staff.

In parallel with this calamity, Shy gets a call from his mother and stepfather, saying that they wish to have nothing more to do with him.The pain of rejection goes from top to bottom. And the film shows the awful pathos of Steve’s position. Over a long career of having to be patient with truculent boys, having to be tolerant, having to joke around, not coming down too hard, walking the line between friendship and authority, he has effectively joined them; Steve has become the most difficult resident of all.

The staff themselves, however affectionate and genuinely respectful of all that he has achieved, are wary and concerned about him as they would be with one of the boys. His drink and substance abuse problems are an open secret. And when the trust chair tells him that the school is finished, Steve erupts with rage and threatens to strangle him – a macabre imitation of just the kind of outburst that they are trying to get the boys to move away from.

The news crew have, meanwhile, set up on-camera interviews with everyone at the school and Steve’s contribution, which begins the film, is so traumatised, and so clearly an interview with someone deeply upset, that you might think at first that this is a psychoanalyst or police procedural interview, or maybe a true-crime documentary.

As for the boys themselves, they seem cheerfully energised by any hint of celebrity. On being asked what advice he would give his six-years younger self, one says: “Always carry a blade.”Shy finally gives us a sequence of hope and even redemption, a moment where the amp is turned down from 11, with an emotional voiceover from Steve himself about the boys; it is a really sympathetic moment, although it perhaps softens the blow and dilutes the ferocity a bit.

Murphy and Lycurgo lead an outstanding cast.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts