机器人舞蹈的演进

机器人舞蹈的演进

2025-09-03Technology
--:--
--:--
马老师
早上好,小王。我是马老师,这是为你专属打造的Goose Pod。今天是9月4日,星期四。
雷总
我是雷总。今天,我们来聊一个非常酷的话题:机器人舞蹈的演进。
马老师
Let's get started。雷总,最近机器人界好像特别热闹,前不久那个世界人形机器人大赛,简直就像是机器人界的“华山论剑”,你懂的。各路高手纷纷登场,展示自己的独门绝技。
雷总
没错!看到我们中国的宇树科技拿了四个项目的冠军,我真的非常激动!虽然有个百米赛跑项目,因为规则让自动机器人有0.8的系数优势,争议不小,但这恰恰说明,这个领域正在飞速发展,竞争非常激烈!
马老师
我认为,这不仅仅是技术的比拼,更是一种“道”的探索。波士顿动力最近也在研究大型行为模型,他们认为,要让机器人真正有用,就必须像人一样,掌握多种“武功”,能应对各种复杂情况。
雷总
完全同意!机器人不能只会“一招鲜”。它们需要能处理各种大小、软硬的物体,同时还要保持平衡,躲避障碍,对突发状况做出反应。这就像做一个全能型的产品,用户体验才能做到极致。
马老师
说得好。其实,让人形机器人跳舞这个想法,根源上是对“人”本身的模仿和探索,自古就有。从达芬奇的机械骑士,到迪士尼乐园里那些载歌载舞的玩偶,我们一直在尝试创造能模仿人类姿态的机器。
雷总
是的,那都是早期的尝试。我记得很清楚,2001年索尼的QRIO机器人,那在当时简直是黑科技!后来本田的ASIMO,更是经典中的经典,它能跑能跳,是很多人对人形机器人的第一印象。那可是我们工程师心中的“偶像”。
马老师
这些早期的“舞者”,更像是设定好套路的表演者。一招一式,都是预先编排好的。虽然看起来神奇,但缺少了灵魂,你懂的。它们只是在执行命令,而不是在“感受”音乐和舞蹈。
雷总
没错,技术上讲,它们受限于当时的计算能力和传感器技术。不过,正是有了这些一步一个脚印的积累,才有了后面的爆发。比如2020年,波士顿动力的机器人们跳《Do You Love Me?》,那个视频我看了不下二十遍!太震撼了!
马老师
那确实是一个里程碑,它让大众看到了机器人惊人的运动能力,甚至有人怀疑是CGI特效。这说明,机器人已经从“形似”进化到了“神似”的阶段,动作的流畅度和力量感,已经非常接近人类了。
马老师
但这就带来一个很有意思的矛盾点。技术越是进步,机器人越像人,有些人反而越是觉得不舒服。就像文章里作者的妻子说的:“我就是不喜欢。” 这种感觉,就是所谓的“恐怖谷”理论,太像人了,反而让人害怕。
雷总
我理解这种感受。但从一个产品经理和工程师的角度看,把机器人造成人形,是最符合逻辑的选择。因为我们的整个世界,桌子、椅子、门、工具,都是为人类形态设计的,人形机器人能无缝接入,这是最 practical 的方案。
马老师
嗯,实用主义是一方面,但情感上的连接是另一方面。我们赋予机器人“快乐的舞蹈”这样的能力,其实是在将它们“拟人化”,希望与它们建立情感共鸣。但这又引出了新的问题:机器人的“创作”算是谁的?是程序员的,还是机器人自己的?
雷总
这是个深刻的问题!目前来看,版权当然属于开发者。但这确实反映出,当机器人开始展现出类似“创造力”的行为时,我们原有的伦理和法律体系就面临挑战了。这也是为什么我们需要不断地讨论和思考。
马老师
我认为,让机器人跳舞,不仅仅是为了娱乐。它像一个“试金石”,全方位地考验着机器人的平衡、协调、力量控制和环境感知能力。能在复杂的舞蹈中游刃有余,那在其他应用场景里,比如工业生产、家庭服务,自然不在话下。
雷总
对!这背后的技术进步是全方位的。现在我们甚至开始用类似GPT的大模型来训练机器人跳舞,让它们不再是死板地重复预设动作,而是能对音乐和环境做出动态响应。这对提升人机交互的自然度和机器人的能源效率都有巨大帮助。
马老师
是的,当一个机器人能像人一样优雅地移动时,它在家庭中进行各种操作就会更节能、更高效,在工厂里也能更好地延长自身寿命,降低成本。这最终会改变我们对“自动化”的认知。
马老师
展望未来,我认为机器人与艺术的结合,会是一个非常 exciting 的方向。当机器人不再只是工具,而是可以成为艺术家的“伙伴”,共同创作,那将是一个全新的境界,是技术与人文的完美融合。
雷总
我完全相信这一天会到来。未来,机器人会接管那些重复、危险的工作,让人类能专注于更有创造性的领域。人和机器,将会在各个行业里“共舞”,共同谱写一个更高效、也更富有想象力的新篇章。
马老师
好了,今天的讨论就到这里。感谢收听Goose Pod。我们明天再见。
雷总
See you tomorrow!

## The Evolution of Robot Dance: A Humanoid Milestone This report from **New Atlas**, authored by **Tesla** (though the article itself is by New Atlas, referencing Tesla's Optimus), explores the fascinating progression of humanoid robots and their increasing ability to perform complex human movements, particularly dancing. The article, published on **August 30, 2025**, highlights how this development signifies a significant step in robotics, moving beyond mere functionality to a more human-like expression. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **Humanoid robots are increasingly capable of sophisticated human-like movements, with dancing serving as a key benchmark for progress.** The article argues that teaching robots to dance is a logical next step in human-robot interaction, as our world is designed for humans, making humanoid forms inherently adaptable. * **Dancing is presented as a uniquely human trait that, when replicated by robots, evokes joy and a sense of connection.** It's seen as a way to test the limits of motion, AI, and human-robot interaction. * **The development of dancing robots is a testament to advancements in various technological fields.** These include onboard CPUs and GPUs, reinforcement learning (RL), physics engines, proprioception, computer vision, SLAM navigation, IMUs, tactile sensors, microcontrollers, servos, and improved battery life. * **The journey from early animatronics to modern, fluid humanoid dancers is significant.** While early animatronics like Disney's "It's a Small World" (debuted 1964) and Chuck E. Cheese's Pizza Time Players (since 1977) were mechanical, today's robots possess advanced capabilities. ### Key Statistics and Metrics: The article provides several examples of robots and their specifications, illustrating the evolution: * **Sony QRIO (Quest for cuRIOsity):** * **Height:** 2 ft (60 cm) * **Weight:** 16 lb (7.3 kg) * **Degrees of Freedom (DoF):** 38 * **Notable:** Featured in Beck's "Hell Yes" video in 2005, capable of walking, running, jumping, and dancing. Scrapped in 2006. * **Aldebaran Robotics NAO Robot:** * **Height:** 22.8 in (58 cm) * **Weight:** 11.9 lb (5.4 kg) * **Degrees of Freedom (DoF):** 25 * **Notable:** Built for education, therapy, and STEM. Sold to schools and labs for **$7,000 to $15,000 per robot**. Became famous for its "Evolution of Dance" remake. * **Toyota T-HR3:** * **Notable:** Showcased in 2017 with fluid movements, including Tai Chi. However, it was **teleoperated**, mimicking a human in a control suit and VR goggles, not fully autonomous. * **Boston Dynamics Atlas (First Generation):** * **Height:** 4 ft 11 in (1.5 m) * **Weight:** 176 lb (80 kg) * **Notable:** Primarily hydraulically powered. Performed a full dance routine to "Do You Love Me?" in late 2020, with skeptics initially believing it was CGI. It was also the first humanoid to land a standing backflip in 2017. * **Unitree G1:** * **Height:** 4 ft 4 in (1.3 m) * **Weight:** 77 lb (35 kg) * **Degrees of Freedom (DoF):** Up to 43 * **Notable:** Features 3D LiDAR and functioning hands. Known for athleticism, including being the first humanoid to do a front flip and backflip without hydraulics, and performing a kip-up. * **Tesla Optimus:** * **Notable:** Showcased with RL-trained dance moves, achieving "zero-shot" transfer from virtual simulation to real-life performance. It performed a basic ballet step, considered a turning point in humanoid robot capabilities. ### Significant Trends or Changes: * **Shift from novelty to advanced platforms:** Modern humanoid robots are no longer just entertainment novelties but highly advanced platforms with significant R&D investment, costing **well over $100,000 to make a single unit**. * **Advancement in AI and learning:** The success of Tesla's Optimus in learning choreography in simulation and executing it perfectly in real life ("zero-shot" transfer) highlights the growing sophistication of AI in robotics. * **Increased fluidity and precision:** Robots are demonstrating fluidity, balance, and precision that can sometimes surpass human capabilities. ### Notable Risks or Concerns: * **Public apprehension:** The article notes that some individuals, like the author's wife, express discomfort with robots being made to look and act like humans, echoing sentiments found in online comments. This raises concerns about the societal implications and acceptance of advanced humanoid robots. ### Material Financial Data: * The **NAO Robot** was priced between **$7,000 and $15,000 per unit**. * Modern humanoid robots can cost **well over $100,000 to produce a single unit**, indicating the significant investment required for their development. In essence, the article posits that while humans have achieved remarkable feats, the ability of robots to dance represents a profound step towards bridging the gap between machine and human, not just in capability but in cultural expression.

The evolution of robot dance

Read original at New Atlas

We humans have mastered fire, split the atom, and shot ourselves into space. We've built machines that can outthink us and tools that can cook us lunch or cut open our chests to perform life-saving surgeries. That's all well and good. The space part is certainly cool, sure ... but it doesn't look like us.

It doesn't feel human. So what’s the logical next step? Teaching humanoid robots to dance like us, obviously.Dance isn't just our thing either. Birds of Paradise, for example, have mating rituals so intricate and elaborate that people form clubs just to catch a glimpse of the show. The males ruffle their tail feathers and two-step into the hearts of females in an effort to get some action.

Very much like humans.Rare Footage of New Bird of Paradise Species Shows Odd Courtship Dance | Nat Geo WildAnd the Manakin is arguably better at moonwalking than the guy who made it famous, Michael Jackson, while Australia's Peacock Spiders moves are as flashy as their outfits.Even insects are in on dance, though theirs is more math equation than party trick.

The honey bee's "waggle dance" shows which direction to find food relative to the sun – like a fuzzy little booty-shaking Pythagoras. Bee Dance (Waggle Dance)But why robots?"The strongest argument for robots in a human form is that our world is already designed for humans, making it easy for humanoid robots to fit in, adapt to existing environments, and be seamlessly repurposed," says Humanoid, maker of the HMND 1.

Hard to disagree. The humanoid form also makes it easier for us to anthropomorphize our new mechanical friends – for better or for worse. I've personally been moved by a few videos, like one from 1X of its Neo Gamma robot where it just looks absolutely pitiful as it does chores, largely ignored by the humans it serves.

But seeing a humanoid robot dance? That's much more joyful and way more fun ... even if a little freaky. Few things embody the human spirit better than dancing.Dancing animatronics have been around for a long time to entertain us and make us smile. Disney's It's a Small World first debuted at the 1964 New York World's Fair before becoming a permanent Disneyland ride in 1966 – a loop of tiny human-like figures dancing daily via hydraulics and pulleys.

And Chuck E. Cheese's animatronic Pizza Time Players have been making kids cry since 1977.Sixty years later and things are wildly different. Onboard CPUs and GPUs, reinforcement learning (RL), physics engines, proprioception, computer vision with real-time object recognition, SLAM navigation, IMUs with gyros and accelerometers, tactile sensors, microcontrollers, servos, and batteries good for hours of runtime – the list goes on.

One of the earlier mainstream dancing bots segments I remember was in 2005, when Beck's "Hell Yes" video featured a gaggle of Sony QRIO bots cutting loose on the dance floor. For its time, it was nuts. The QRIO (Quest for cuRIOsity) was built for entertainment, stood 2 ft (60 cm) tall, weighed 16 lb (7.

3 kg), and had 38 degrees of freedom (DoF). It could walk, run, jump, and most importantly, dance. They were never sold publicly, and then suddenly scrapped just a year later in 2006.Beck - Hell Yes (Official Music Video)In 2008, Aldebaran Robotics came out swinging with the NAO Robot. It was built for the education sector and found niches in therapy, autism interventions, and STEM.

It stood 22.8 in (58 cm) tall, weighed 11.9 lb (5.4 kg), and had 25 DoF. It was sold mostly to schools and labs and it cost between $7,000 and $15,000 per robot.Though it wasn't entirely open source, it was programmable within certain constraints. Nearly the moment it got into users' hands, the NAO was hacked into a dancing machine using Choregraphe, a drag-and-drop motion sequencer.

Probably the most famous video of them all was the NAO remake of Judson Laipply's "Evolution of Dance."Evolution Of Dance by NAO RobotBy 2017, Toyota showed off its T-HR3 robot – incredibly fluid, even pulling off delicate Tai Chi moves ... but it was teleoperated, mimicking a human in a control suit and VR goggles.

It wasn't fully autonomous, but I included it on this list because it may have been one of the first to reach those levels of human-like fluidity, hinting at what the future may hold.Demonstration of T-HR3 robot by Toyota at iRex17 (part 2 of 2) [RAW VIDEO]Then Boston Dynamics dropped the hammer in late 2020.

Humanity was stuck at home, locked down during the COVID pandemic, when suddenly Spot, Atlas, and Handle were doing the mashed potato, the twist, and a full dance routine to The Contours' 1962 hit "Do You Love Me?" About 42 million people watched, jaws collectively on the floor.The first-generation Atlas – a 4-ft 11-in (1.

5-m), 176-lb (80\-kg), mostly hydraulically powered humanoid robot – moved so well that years later, skeptics still insist it's CGI. It's not. In fact, filming that routine exposed flaws that required Boston Dynamics to make upgrades to Atlas just to pull off the routine. And remember, Atlas was also the first humanoid to land a standing backflip back in 2017.

Do You Love Me?Since then, things have only escalated.Chinese company Unitree burst onto the scene with the G1 – a 4-ft 4-in (1.3-m), 77-lb (35-kg) bot with up to 43 DoF, 3D LiDAR, functioning hands ... and insane athleticism (roboticism?). It was the first humanoid 'bot to do a front flip, the first to backflip without hydraulics, and it can kip-up from its back like a seasoned martial artist.

And yes, it dances – better than I do, honestly.What Dance Would You Like to Perform with Unitree G1?But the inspiration for this whole piece was Tesla's Optimus.Milan Kovac, former Tesla VP of Optimus Engineering, posted a clip of Optimus' RL-trained dance moves – "zero-shot" from virtual to real life.

Basically, it learned the choreography in simulation, then nailed it in real life on the first try. That's like imagining yourself dancing Swan Lake while laying on the couch, then standing up and actually doing it.Here's a little more, and no cables this time ;)It's all real-time speed, zero CGI, fully learned in Simulation & zero-shot transferred to real.

Besides the fact that it's fun, we had to make significant improvements to our robot model in Sim, domain randomization and other… https://t.co/Fhnm84vDQE— Milan Kovac (@_milankovac_) May 14, 2025Albeit short, seeing Optimus pull off a basic ballet step floored me. It was the first time I've seen a humanoid robot attempt actual ballet, and it felt like a turning point; a true shift in robotic capabilities.

Huawei did a half-ballet collab back in 2021, but this was on another level.I asked the wifey – who's very much anti-AI and anti-robot – what she thought. Her only words: "Why are we making robots like humans? I don't like it." A sentiment echoed in thousands of comments in these YouTube videos.And yet ...

here we are.From QRIO to Optimus, humanoid robots are literally dancing their way into the cultural spotlight. And these aren't just novelty robots anymore – modern humanoids are highly advanced platforms with hundreds of millions of dollars invested in R&D. Machines that can cost well over $100,000 to make just a single unit.

They have fluidity, balance, and precision that sometimes makes us look clumsy. The fact that we're making these machines waltz, running man, and even plié isn't just about entertainment anymore – it's about testing the limits of motion, of AI, and of human-robot interaction.So maybe teaching robots to dance isn't really the "next step" in technological evolution ...

but it might be the most human one yet.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts