战争的代价:俄罗斯是否资金耗尽以继续战斗?

战争的代价:俄罗斯是否资金耗尽以继续战斗?

2025-11-15Business
--:--
--:--
马老师
Norris,早上好,我是马老师。现在是周六,11月15号,早上8点。欢迎收听专为你打造的 Goose Pod。
雷总
Hello, 我是雷总。今天我们来聊一个硬核话题:战争的代价:俄罗斯是否资金耗尽以继续战斗?
马老师
没错,最近的数据,你懂的,已经说明了一些问题。俄罗斯十月份的联邦预算出现了赤字,大概是4000亿卢布,这让今年的总缺口达到了4.2万亿卢布。这个数字,非同小可啊。
雷总
是的!这个赤字占到了GDP的1.9%。核心原因是什么呢?就是他们的石油价格,在美国的制裁下,创了新低。朋友们,要知道,油气产业的税收,在今年的前10个月,跟去年同期相比,直接下降了21.4%!
马老师
这就好比一个武林高手,他的主要内功心法被对手找到了破绽,现在内力供应不上了。俄罗斯反对派政治家,曾经也是政府经济顾问的米洛夫就说得很直接:“维持军事机器需要更多钱,但现在根本没有。”
雷总
完全正确!米洛夫的报告我看了,非常有深度。为了应对这个问题,他们也想了办法,比如提高税收。企业利润税从20%提高到25%,增值税也计划要提高到22%。但是,这些措施能产生的收入,和巨大的军费需求比起来,只是杯水车薪。
马老师
这就像高手想通过扎马步来快速恢复内力,但失血太多,光靠扎马步是不够的。我认为,这反映了一个更深层次的结构性问题。甚至连俄罗斯联邦储蓄银行的行长都承认,经济增长“非常温和”,这和官方宣传的稳定强大,完全是两个调子。
雷总
是的,这种反差太大了。而且这场冲突,如果持续下去,到2026年6月,就要比第一次世界大战的时间还长了。乌克兰总统泽连斯基也说,他们最成功的导弹射程达到了3000公里。这说明,战争的成本还在不断地增加,对俄罗斯的财政压力是越来越大。
马老师
要理解今天的困境,我们得把时间往前拨一拨,看看俄罗斯的军费开支这条曲线,你懂的,充满了戏剧性的变化。苏联解体后,从1991年到1997年,他们的国防开支,按实际价格计算,缩水了八倍。兵器生产也大幅下降。
雷总
是的,那段时间非常困难。特别是1998年,爆发了严重的金融危机,也就是所谓的“卢布危机”。当时俄罗斯的军费开支跌到了谷底,只有1991年苏联水平的四分之一。卢布在不到一个月里,贬值了三分之二,国家不得不债务违约。
马老师
那次危机,我认为,是一个重要的转折点。它暴露了俄罗斯经济的脆弱性。当时内有车臣战争的巨大消耗,外有亚洲金融风暴的冲击,加上油价下跌,整个国家的财政体系几乎崩溃。那是一次深刻的教训。
雷总
没错。但是,普京上台后,情况开始逆转。尤其是在2008年军事改革之后,军费开支开始快速增长。我这里有一组数据,朋友们可以感受一下:从2000年到2021年,俄罗斯的军事预算从92.3亿美元增加到659亿美元,增长了超过600%!
马老师
这个增长,就像一个沉寂多年的武林门派,突然开始疯狂招兵买马,重铸神兵利器。到2014年,他们的军费预算已经超过了任何一个欧洲国家。这背后,是一种重振雄风的强烈意愿。
雷总
是的,这种势头一直持续到最近。战争爆发后,军费更是飙升。预计2024年,军费开支可能达到1400亿美元,占到所有政府开支的35%。国防和安全开支加起来,预计要占到2025年政府总开支的40%!这超过了教育、医疗、社会政策和国民经济的总和!
马老师
你看,这就形成了一个巨大的矛盾。一方面是历史性的高额军费投入,另一方面是我们开头提到的,创纪录的财政赤字。根据预算草案,俄罗斯将面临连续七年的高额赤字,这是1999年以来从未有过的。这说明,旧的增长模式,已经走到了尽头。
马老师
那么问题来了,西方的制裁到底有没有用?这里面的观点,就像华山论剑,各派都有自己的说法。一方认为,制裁效果是“温和的”,没有达到预期的雷霆万钧之效。毕竟,俄罗斯也早有准备,搞了一个“堡垒俄罗斯”战略。
雷总
是的,这个战略就是提前建立宏观经济的缓冲,积累外国资产,然后把货币储备去美元化,还开发了自己国内的支付系统。但是,我认为,制裁的效果不能只看短期。俄罗斯2023年GDP号称增长了3.6%,但这主要是靠战争相关的财政刺激,代价是高通胀。
马老师
没错,这种增长,好比一个武者服用了一颗短时间提升功力的丹药,看起来很强,但实际上是在透支生命力。而且,制裁的另一个问题是,执行层面有漏洞。一些所谓的“黑骑士”国家,比如土耳其、阿联酋,帮助俄罗斯规避制裁。
雷总
对,贸易转移非常明显。现在中国和印度取代了欧盟,成了俄罗斯能源的主要买家。很多关键的军用零部件,俄罗斯仍然可以通过这些中间渠道进口。这让制裁的效果大打折扣。所以,制裁这场博弈,不是一纸禁令那么简单,而是全方位的对抗。
马老师
但从另一个角度看,制裁也深刻地改变了俄罗斯的国际地位。它把俄罗斯推向了所谓的“动荡轴心”,与中国、伊朗、朝鲜走得更近,试图挑战现有的国际秩序。同时,俄罗斯也在积极拉拢“全球南方”国家,你懂的,就是利用他们对西方的不满。
雷总
是的,这种地缘政治的冲突,比经济上的数字更复杂。俄罗斯在宣传上,把自己定位为反抗西方霸权的领导者,这种叙事在很多国家很有市场。所以,这场冲突不仅仅是战场上的对抗,也是一场关于国际秩序和话语权的激烈斗争。
马老师
谈到具体影响,我认为技术禁运这一招,算是部分成功了。它就像点穴一样,虽然没有一招制敌,但确实打乱了对方的经脉运行。俄罗斯现在很难进口西方的先进设备和零件,这导致效率下降,未来的技术进步也被堵死了。
雷总
是的,汽车工业受到的影响尤其大。不过,在军事生产上,制裁虽然减缓了它的扩张速度,但没有能阻止它。因为大部分零件和原材料是国内的,而且他们可以通过其他国家进口必要的电子产品,比如芯片,虽然价格要贵一倍。
马老师
能源出口方面,也是一个很有意思的局面。他们的石油生产很有韧性,但因为G7的价格上限和欧盟的禁运,他们不得不打折出售,每桶要便宜10美元以上。你算算,每桶便宜1美元,一年就损失25亿美元的收入。这是一个巨大的失血点。
雷总
而且,他们自己切断对欧盟的天然气供应,这个决策的代价非常高昂。这相当于放弃了一个每年能带来超过300亿美元收入的大生意。金融制裁也让他们的对外贸易和资本转移变得非常复杂,成本大大增加。很多外国银行都不敢和俄罗斯客户打交道。
马老师
最关键的一招,是冻结俄罗斯央行的储备金。这等于废掉了他们的“护体神功”。以前他们有这笔钱作为保险,不怕出口收入突然下降。现在这个保险没了,一旦商品价格暴跌,卢布就可能崩溃,通货膨胀会飙升。所以,制裁的综合影响是,它“夺走了俄罗斯的经济未来”。
马老师
展望未来,普京自己的表态很有意思。他说,“对现代化武装力量的需求不会就此结束。”这说明,无论这场战争结果如何,俄罗斯都打算长期维持一支庞大的军队。这是一种超越眼下战事的战略决心。
雷总
但问题是,决心需要钱来支撑。以目前这种财政状况,如何去支撑这种长期的军事需求?西方的下一步棋,很可能就是继续在能源出口上施压。有一个提议是,到2030年,将俄罗斯的原油和石油产品出口量每天减少200万桶。
马老师
如果这个目标实现,每年就能让俄罗斯再减少500亿美元的出口收入。这等于是在他们已经很虚弱的经济上,再抽掉一根主梁。我认为,未来的走向,很大程度上取决于这场围绕能源的经济战。俄罗斯能撑多久,取决于他们能在多大程度上找到替代的资金来源。
雷总
总结一下,俄罗斯正面临严重的预算危机,这让它长期维持军事机器变得越来越困难。今天的讨论就到这里。感谢 Norris 收听 Goose Pod。
马老师
是的,感谢你的收听。See you tomorrow!

俄罗斯面临严重的财政赤字,石油收入下降,军费开支飙升。尽管试图通过增税和规避制裁来弥补,但效果有限。技术禁运和能源出口受限进一步削弱其经济。俄罗斯长期维持庞大军队的决心面临资金挑战,未来经济走向取决于能源战的博弈。

The cost of war: Is Russia running out of money to continue the fight?

Read original at The Kyiv Independent

A view of the full moon over the Russian Foreign Ministry in Moscow, Russia on June 4, 2023. (Sefa Karacan/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)In early October, the Russian government released the full draft of its 2026–2028 federal budget, outlining President Vladimir Putin's key policy priorities for the coming years.

In his report for the Free Russia Foundation think tank, shared with the Kyiv Independent, Russian opposition politician Vladimir Milov said Russia's budgetary situation is anything but "normal.""To keep (Russia's) military machine running like this, a lot more money is needed — and there simply is not any," Milov, who was an economic advisor for the Russian government in the early 2000s, told the Kyiv Independent.

The Kyiv Independent looked into the Russian budget draft to see if Russia is ultimately running out of money to feed into its war machine.Russia’s air defenses are wide open — there’s just one problemThe Kyiv IndependentTania MyronyshenaSeven years of deficitsAccording to the report, Russia is experiencing a full-blown budget crisis.

Vladimir Dubrovskiy, a senior economist at the Center for Social and Economic Research Ukraine, said the deficit is "Russia's most serious economic and political-economic problem."The country is facing seven consecutive years of high budget deficit (over 2%) — a streak unseen since 1999, according to Milov's report.

The Russian government has officially abandoned its goal of keeping the deficit below 1% of GDP.For 2025, the projected deficit was increased by 0.5% to a 2.6% total. The government expects the 2026 deficit to fall to 1.6% of GDP, but analysts say that projection is likely unrealistic."The deficit that Russia is expecting for 2025 is quite significant.

It is true that the planned deficit for 2026 is lower, but those numbers are wishful thinking," Benjamin Hilgenstock, head of macroeconomic research and strategy at the KSE Institute, said.Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov (L) talks to Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina (R) at the Grand Kremlin Palace, on April 17, 2024 in Moscow, Russia.

(Contributor/Getty Images)Dubrovskiy also believes the projected figures are an underestimation."If the war continues, the deficit will almost certainly grow significantly, as it did in the past," he told the Kyiv Independent. "Moreover, this estimate does not take into account the potential impact of future economic sanctions."

Hilgenstock added that in any case, a deficit of 2-3% of GDP is "a lot for Russia since it doesn't have access to financing like normal countries."Moscow remains shut out of international financial markets due to sanctions, leaving it dependent on domestic borrowing and limited reserves. Even China, once seen as a potential lender, has refused to provide government loans.

Expensive warThis fiscal crisis affects Russia's ability to fund the war against Ukraine.The Kremlin has been forced — at least on paper — to cap further increases in military spending to keep its books in check. Yet the government no longer publishes real expenditure data, releasing only projections.

Between 2026 and 2028, Moscow claims defense spending will remain flat, falling slightly as a share of GDP from 6.3% in 2025 to 5.5% in 2026 and 2027, and further to 4.7% in 2028.Milov says the figures hide a deeper problem."The military-industrial complex is facing financial difficulties," Milov said.

"To keep it operating even at its current pace — without further cuts we've seen — is becoming increasingly difficult."Russian military personnel arrive to participate in the Victory Day military parade, to be held at Red Square, in central Moscow on May 9, 2023. (Kirill Kudriavtsev/AFP via Getty Images)Sergey Chemezov, CEO of Rostec, Russia's largest arms producer, admitted in August that "the profitability of production remains low, and somewhere even zero, if not negative," leaving "not too many funds for development."

The result, Milov said, is that Russia can afford only a limited, low-intensity war.He noted that the current phase of the war is "not very intense" in terms of the use of military equipment like tanks, relying mostly on drone strikes, missile attacks, and localized offensives."This type of warfare they can sustain for some time," Milov said, "but the question is what for."

Cutting bonusesSeveral major regions — including Saint Petersburg, Samara, Tatarstan, and Bashkortostan — have slashed recruitment bonuses for volunteer fighters, in some cases fivefold.Instead of launching a new mobilization, the Kremlin has leaned on financial incentives and recruitment campaigns, offering lucrative contracts to volunteers willing to fight in Ukraine.

Although these payments are drawn from regional, not federal, budgets, this trend reflects Russia's broader budget crisis, Milov noted, which severely limits the federal center's ability to provide financial assistance to the regions.Trump takes aim at Putin’s oil lifeline — China and India still hold the keyThe Kyiv IndependentTim ZadorozhnyyOut of optionsWith traditional funding routes exhausted, Russia is left with limited options to finance its budget deficit.

The liquid part of the National Wealth Fund — once Russia's main fiscal cushion — has dwindled to 4.2 trillion rubles ($50 billion), far short of the 5.7 trillion rubles ($70 billion) deficit expected for 2025 alone.Domestic borrowing through state bonds is also functionally impossible under current conditions, as yields on 10-year bonds exceed 15%.

The high cost of debt servicing offsets the amount that can be potentially raised.Mark Stalczynski, Senior Analyst at RAND, noted that the Russian government has raised taxes "to partially offset" defense spending since the beginning of the full-scale war.But while the government has resorted to extensive tax hikes — such as increasing the corporate profit tax to 25% and planning a value-added tax increase to 22% — the resulting revenue generated only a fraction of what's needed.

Russia’s military spending is projected to decline from 5.3% of its GDP to 4.7% by 2028 (Nizar al-Rifai/The Kyiv Independent)Therefore, the only remaining option the government seems to be resorting to is monetary emission — de facto Central Bank credit to the government, Milov noted."Large-scale domestic borrowing would further depress the economy and would immediately remind Russian elites of the disastrous 1998 financial collapse, which was caused by the same type of deficit financing at high interest rates," Dubrovskiy said.

How the West can squeeze Russia outAccording to Milov, Russia's deepening economic and budget crisis is a direct consequence of Western sanctions.He argued that Europe must accelerate phasing out of Russian energy — cutting imports of liquefied natural gas by 2027 and all other energy resources by 2028 to further disrupt Russia's war machine."

This is extremely important," he said, adding that gas supplies to Slovakia and Hungary, as well as LNG exports to Western Europe, remain among Gazprom's main sources of revenue."These deliveries bring Gazprom well over half of its total profit," Milov said.Vasily Astrov, a senior economist at the Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, believes Russia's worsening fiscal performance this year stems primarily from two factors — lower global oil prices and an overvalued ruble.

The ruble's strength has reduced revenues from energy exports once converted into the national currency, he told the Kyiv Independent.Dubrovskiy said that while the oil price cap, which sets the maximum allowable price for Russian seaborne oil exports, remains "the most significant measure" against Russia, it has not yet become fully effective.

Secondary sanctions and restrictions targeting specific Russian entities "have so far been largely symbolic," producing at best "one-off effects," according to Dubrovskiy."Until now, the global decline in oil prices has had the greatest impact," he said.Milov emphasized that Western sanctions — though not a single "magical measure," but rather a complex system of restrictions — are working."

High inflation and interest rates are, of course, a direct product of sanctions," Milov concluded.Can the West win a сeasefire with Russia?The Kyiv IndependentCatarina BuchatskiyNote from the author:Hi, this is Tim. The author of this article. Thank you for taking the time to read it. At the Kyiv Independent, we don't have a wealthy owner or political backing.

We rely on readers like you to support our work.If you found this article interesting, consider joining our community today.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts