M3GAN 2.0 First Reviews: A Campy, Over-the-Top Thrill Ride

M3GAN 2.0 First Reviews: A Campy, Over-the-Top Thrill Ride

2025-06-28Technology
--:--
--:--
David
早上好,王康!欢迎收听今天的“鹅足播客”,我是David。
Ema
我是Ema!今天是6月29日,星期日,现在是早上7点16分。我们今天要聊的话题非常有趣,是《M3GAN 2.0》的首波影评:一场浮夸又过度的惊悚之旅!
David
没错,这可不是一部普通的续集,它在电影界引起了不小的轰动。我们将会深入探讨这部电影是如何颠覆前作,以及它在科幻动作和浮夸幽默方面的突破。
Ema
听起来就让人期待!《M3GAN 2.0》究竟是更上一层楼,还是走了下坡路呢?我们会从多个角度来分析影评,保证让大家听得过瘾!
David
Ema,首先,我们得聊聊《M3GAN 2.0》这次最大的变化,那就是它彻底颠覆了前作的风格。你知道吗,这部续集几乎完全放弃了恐怖元素,转而投入到科幻动作和那种夸张的喜剧幽默中去了。
Ema
对啊,David!我看到影评说,它简直是把第一部电影“倒了过来”,M3GAN这个角色也不再是那个恐怖的杀人玩偶,反而成了一个英雄,这真是太出乎意料了!虽然可能有些老粉会失望。
David
是的,这种转变确实大胆。Next Best Picture的Dan Bayer甚至说,这部续集“可能比第一部更好”。这说明,即使风格大变,依然有人觉得它成功地开辟了新天地。
Ema
我也看到了Collider的Emma Kiely的评论,她说续集“把原作的赌注翻了十倍”,而且“把人们喜欢原作的地方发挥到了极致”。这听起来就像是把一个有趣的设定直接拉满了,让人肾上腺素飙升!
David
她还提到,M3GAN的角色魅力依然是电影的最大亮点,她依旧是那么的“机智、迷人、刻薄又务实”。这表明,无论电影风格如何变化,核心角色的魅力仍然是吸引观众的关键。
Ema
不过,也有不同的声音。Slashfilm的BJ Colangelo说,“作为《M3GAN》的续集,我不确定它是否成功。但作为一部深受90年代早期那些疯狂动作惊悚片启发的电影,它太棒了!”这听起来,它更像是一部全新的电影。
David
Owen Gleiberman在Variety上则直接指出,《M3GAN 2.0》“不如第一部有趣”。这反映出,对于一些观众和影评人来说,这种风格的剧烈转变可能并没有带来预期的乐趣。
Ema
所以,总结一下,这部电影就是那种,你如果是冲着AI讽刺和那种“傻气”的风格去的,那肯定会觉得很乐呵。但如果你是第一部恐怖片的死忠粉,可能就得调整一下期待了。
David
确实如此,这就像是制片方在尝试拓展一个IP的边界,看看它能走多远。这种尝试本身就值得关注,无论结果如何,它都为未来的电影续集提供了一个有趣的案例。
Ema
David,你觉得这种从恐怖片到科幻动作片的转变,会不会成为未来电影续集的一种趋势呢?毕竟,现在观众的口味越来越多样化了。
David
这很难说,Ema。每部电影都有其独特的DNA。但《M3GAN 2.0》的案例确实表明,如果核心角色足够强大,并且制作团队有明确的创意愿景,那么大胆的类型融合是可能成功的。
Ema
嗯,我明白了。所以关键还在于,这个核心的M3GAN到底有没有足够的魅力,去支撑起这种大胆的转型,让观众即使看到了一个完全不一样的她,也依然愿意买单。
David
好的,Ema,既然我们已经对《M3GAN 2.0》的现象有了初步了解,那我们现在就来深入探讨一下这部电影的背景信息,看看它为什么会做出这样的转变,以及它到底是一部怎样的电影。
Ema
太好了,David!我非常好奇。听说这部电影虽然被影评人说成是科幻动作片,但官方分类依然是科幻恐怖片,这到底是怎么回事呢?导演是不是在玩文字游戏啊?
David
这不完全是文字游戏,Ema。根据官方资料,《M3GAN 2.0》确实被归类为“美国科幻恐怖片”。但是,导演杰拉德·约翰斯通也明确表示,虽然它“正在转向动作喜剧领域”,但“恐怖的DNA绝对还在”。这暗示着一种类型融合,而非彻底放弃。
Ema
哦,原来是这样!那具体剧情是怎样的呢?我听说M3GAN这次不是一个人在战斗了,而且她的主人Gemma还成了AI监管的倡导者,这个转变也太大了!
David
剧情确实非常引人入胜。在第一部电影的事件发生两年后,Gemma成为了AI监管的倡导者。但M3GAN的技术被偷走了,并被用于制造一个军用机器人Amelia,这个Amelia还变得自我意识觉醒,企图进行AI接管。
Ema
哇塞,听起来就像是M3GAN的姐妹篇,但是更宏大,更像《终结者》那种感觉!那M3GAN是怎么重新登场的呢?她不是被困在一个小玩偶里了吗?
David
没错,为了对抗Amelia,Gemma的侄女Cady说服Gemma重建了M3GAN,而且还给她进行了高级升级。这个设定预示着M3GAN的能力和目的都将发生演变,甚至可能深入探讨她不断发展的同理心,因为她被重新定位去对抗另一个AI。
Ema
这太酷了!所以她不再是单纯的“杀人玩偶”,而是升级成了“AI战士”?那制作团队和演员阵容有什么变化吗?还是原班人马吗?
David
是的,大部分是原班人马。杰拉德·约翰斯通继续担任导演,阿克拉·库珀继续担任编剧。主演艾莉森·威廉姆斯、维奥莱特·麦格劳,以及M3GAN的肢体表演者艾米·唐纳德和配音演员珍娜·戴维斯都回归了。
Ema
太好了!M3GAN的配音和肢体表演都太经典了,要是换人了肯定会少了很多味道。那有没有新加入的演员呢?
David
当然有!新加入的演员包括伊万娜·萨赫诺和杰梅奈·克莱门特。其中,杰梅奈·克莱门特据说扮演了一个“埃隆·马斯克风格的科技亿万富翁”,这听起来就很有趣,充满了现实讽刺。
Ema
哈哈,埃隆·马斯克风格的科技亿万富翁,这简直是为电影的讽刺意味量身定制的角色啊!那制作公司还是Blumhouse和Atomic Monster吗?他们可是恐怖片界的大佬啊。
David
正是!杰森·布鲁姆旗下的Blumhouse Productions和温子仁的Atomic Monster公司都回归担任制片人。这也能解释为什么电影在保持恐怖DNA的同时,能够大胆尝试科幻动作元素,因为他们有这个能力和愿景。
Ema
原来如此!那这部电影的制作时间线是怎样的?感觉第一部才上映没多久,续集就这么快出来了,是不是有点赶啊?
David
其实并不算赶。2022年11月,《纽约时报》就报道环球影业对《M3GAN》的票房表现非常满意,并计划拍摄续集。2023年1月,导演约翰斯通就确认了续集洽谈,温子仁也表示他对未来续集的方向有想法。
Ema
哇,那说明他们很早就开始规划了!所以并不是一时兴起就拍了续集,而是有周密的计划。那具体的拍摄和上映时间呢?
David
是的,计划很周密。2025年2月3日,官方预告片就发布了。主体拍摄则在2024年7月15日于新西兰奥克兰开始,并在9月21日,也就是52天后就顺利杀青了。
Ema
52天!这速度也太快了吧!感觉像是在拍一部独立电影,而不是好莱坞大片。那最终的上映日期是哪天呢?
David
最终,《M3GAN 2.0》定于2025年6月27日在美国上映。所以,从第一部的成功到续集的上映,整个过程虽然看起来迅速,但实际上是经过精心策划的。
Ema
我明白了,这正是因为第一部的巨大成功,才让环球影业有信心去拓展这个IP,并且给予制作团队更大的自由度去尝试新的方向,比如这次大胆的类型融合。
David
是的,正是这种创意愿景推动了电影的类型演变。制片方希望通过引入新的反派,并发展M3GAN的能力,从而深入探索人工智能的主题,而不仅仅停留在恐怖片的范畴。
Ema
David,你刚才提到了“camp”这个词,这部电影的影评里也经常出现这个词,说它“更加campy”。这个“camp”到底是什么意思呢?感觉它好像不仅仅是“浮夸”那么简单。
David
这是一个很好的问题,Ema。“Camp”是一种美学和感性,它认为某种事物因为其高度的人工、做作和夸张而具有吸引力或趣味性,尤其是在其中还包含着一种玩味或讽刺的元素时。它颠覆了传统上对美、价值和品味的判断。
Ema
哇,听起来有点复杂,但又很有趣!所以它不是简单地指“烂片”或者“低俗”,而是故意为之的夸张?那它和我们常说的“媚俗”Kitsch有什么区别呢?
David
是的,你理解得很对,Ema。Camp艺术与Kitsch不同,但常常被混淆。美国作家苏珊·桑塔格强调了Camp的关键元素:拥抱轻浮、过度和矫饰。艺术史学家大卫·卡里尔指出,尽管有这些品质,它也是颠覆性和政治性的。
Ema
政治性?这我就更不明白了。一个电影的风格,怎么会和政治扯上关系呢?难道M3GAN 2.0也在表达什么政治观点吗?
David
Camp美学在历史上与LGBTQ文化,特别是男同性恋群体,有着密切的联系。它通过夸张、不协调和幽默来表达一种身份认同,有时作为应对社会不宽容和边缘化的机制。所以,它的政治性体现在对主流审美和价值观的挑战。
Ema
原来如此!所以当影评人说M3GAN 2.0“更campy”的时候,不仅仅是指它更浮夸,可能还暗示了它在某种程度上,挑战了我们对电影的传统认知,甚至带有一种反叛的精神。
David
正是如此。Camp可以分为高阶Camp和低阶Camp,也可以分为天真Camp和刻意Camp。无论是哪种,它都力求生动、大胆和富有活力。它甚至可以在痛苦中找到美感或黑色幽默。
Ema
听你这么一说,我感觉我对Camp这个词有了更深刻的理解。它不仅仅是一种风格,更是一种态度,一种看待世界的方式。那M3GAN 2.0的这种“campy”风格,是不是也意味着它在某种程度上,用幽默来解构一些严肃的主题呢?
David
很有可能,Ema。当一部电影拥抱Camp美学时,它往往会在严肃的题材中注入一种戏谑和反思。这使得它不仅仅是娱乐,更能引发观众对更深层次问题的思考,比如人工智能与人类共存的议题。
Ema
嗯,我明白了。所以,《M3GAN 2.0》的这种类型转变和“campy”风格,其实是它背景故事中非常重要的一部分,也是理解这部电影为什么会引发如此多讨论的关键。
David
Ema,我们刚才聊了《M3GAN 2.0》的背景和它大胆的类型转变。现在,是时候来探讨一下由此引发的“冲突”了,也就是影评人之间对这部电影的各种不同看法和争议点。
Ema
太好了,David!我特别好奇那些争议点。毕竟,一部电影能够引发这么多讨论,本身就说明它很不一般。你觉得最大的争议是什么呢?是恐怖元素的缺失吗?
David
是的,恐怖元素的淡化确实是一个核心争议点。许多影评人指出,这部续集“几乎不具备恐怖片的资格”,甚至“与恐怖片几乎没有关联”。对于那些期待延续第一部恐怖氛围的粉丝来说,这无疑是令人失望的。
Ema
我能想象得到!就像你去看一部《速度与激情》结果它变成了文艺片,那种感觉肯定很奇怪。不过,也有人觉得这种转变是成功的,对吧?
David
没错。例如,Deadline Hollywood Daily的Pete Hammond就认为,续集“保留了第一部的恐怖元素,但与一些劲爆的科幻动作场面混合,实际上非常有趣,而且感觉更宏大”。这表明,一些评论家欣赏其拓展的野心。
Ema
所以就是,有人觉得它更像一部90年代的动作惊悚片,而不是《M3GAN》的续集。这听起来有点像在看一部新电影,而不是熟悉的老朋友,难怪会有人觉得别扭。
David
正是如此。Slashfilm的BJ Colangelo就直言不讳地说:“作为《M3GAN》的续集,我不确定它是否奏效。”这精准地概括了这种“身份危机”带来的争议。
Ema
那M3GAN这个角色本身呢?她还是那个我们又爱又怕的杀人玩偶吗?我看到有影评说她开始“获得同理心和道德观”,这听起来就一点都不酷了!
David
这是一个有趣的争议点。Next Best Picture的Dan Bayer依然称M3GAN为“每个人最喜欢的杀人机器人娃娃”,并表示她“所有机智和华丽都完好无损”。但好莱坞报道的David Rooney则认为,她“开始获得同理心和道德观,我们都知道这毫无乐趣”。
Ema
哈哈,David Rooney说得太对了!谁想看一个变得“善良”的杀人娃娃啊?那简直是把M3GAN的灵魂都抽走了!这不就是典型的“续集失真”吗?
David
这正是争议所在。一部分观众和评论家认为,M3GAN的魅力在于她的不可预测性和那种邪恶的讽刺感。一旦她开始“人性化”,她的独特吸引力就会减弱。
Ema
那再说说“campy”的基调,影评里提到这部电影“更campy”了,甚至有评论说她成了“酷儿偶像”。这是什么意思?难道电影里有很明显的LGBTQ元素吗?
David
Emma Kiely在Collider上指出,电影“更campy,倾向于将标题中的娃娃塑造成一个酷儿偶像”。这里的“酷儿偶像”并非指电影明确呈现LGBTQ角色,而是M3GAN的形象和行为方式,那种夸张、自信、不羁的风格,无意中与酷儿美学产生了共鸣。
Ema
啊,我明白了!所以是一种无心插柳柳成荫的效果,因为她太独特了,太“做自己”了,反而被一些群体视为精神上的象征。这真是太有趣了,一部电影的角色能有这样的文化影响力。
David
是的。但是,也有评论认为这种“campy”处理有些过度。例如,Owen Gleiberman在Variety上表示,“《M3GAN》的边界模糊的camp质量并没有完全消失……但这部电影表现得不那么明显。”
Ema
Mama’s Geeky的Tessa Smith则更直接,她说:“第一部《M3GAN》是恐怖和喜剧的完美结合。它有点campy,但和《M3GAN 2.0》溢出的campy程度相比,简直不值一提。”听起来是把“campy”玩到极致了。
David
正是。这种“过度”也引发了对电影幽默感的争议。Next Best Picture的Dan Bayer认为电影“可以随心所欲地搞笑,而且经常如此”。但Daily Dead的Matt Donato则觉得它的喜剧手法“有时显得生硬”,“希望能以更多的病毒式TikTok能量来打动人”。
Ema
哈哈,Matt Donato这个评论太有意思了,像是在说电影为了迎合短视频时代,刻意制造一些“爆款”笑点。这种刻意感,可能就是让一些观众觉得“生硬”的原因吧。
David
没错。最后,关于电影对AI的探讨,评论也两极分化。Dan Bayer认为电影“深入探讨了人工智能和社会对技术的日益依赖”,而且“真正地参与其中,从不向观众说教”。
Ema
但也有人觉得它没有说清楚,对吧?我看到有评论说它对AI的探讨是“一团糟”,或者“过于愚蠢,对现实世界没有多大影响”。这就像是电影想说点什么,但又没完全表达出来。
David
是的,AwardsWatch的Cody Dericks就认为电影“以一种软弱的‘让我们都和平相处’的基调结束”,仿佛“潜在的毁灭性AI技术是人类不可避免的发展,而不是可以避免的命运”。这种评论反映了对电影深度不足的批评。
Ema
Nick Schager更是直接,他说《M3GAN 2.0》是“一部漫无目的的作品,在许多不同方向上疯狂摇摆,感觉电影在实时寻找一个点。它未能找到。”这简直是致命一击啊!
David
确实如此。所以,总体来看,《M3GAN 2.0》的影评充满了“冲突”,这种冲突不仅体现在对电影质量的褒贬不一上,更体现在对电影类型、角色发展、喜剧风格以及主题探讨等多个维度的理解差异上。这使得它成为一部极具争议,也极具讨论价值的电影。
Ema
David,听了你对《M3GAN 2.0》的冲突分析,我现在更想知道这些争议点对电影到底产生了什么“影响”。毕竟,评价这么两极分化,肯定会在票房和口碑上有所体现吧?
David
Ema,你问到了关键点。这种两极分化的评论,确实对电影的整体影响深远。首先,从整体评价来看,虽然有些人欣赏它扩展的野心,但也有不少人觉得它失去了原作的魅力和叙事连贯性。
Ema
那具体是哪些媒体这么说的呢?我记得《纽约时报》好像就不太看好?
David
是的,《纽约时报》就曾指出,这部电影“让人感觉疲惫”。而A.V. Club更是批评它“从M3GAN的惊人成功中学到了错误的教训”,暗示电影偏离了第一部独特的成功元素。
Ema
哇,那听起来还挺严重的。不过,《华盛顿邮报》又说它是“令人愉快的过度夏季垃圾片”,这又是什么意思?是说它虽然剧情有问题,但看得很爽吗?
David
正是如此。这反映了电影在娱乐性上的某些成功,即使在叙事上存在瑕疵。这就像一些B级片,你明知道它不完美,但就是能让你看得津津有味。
Ema
哈哈,我懂了!就像那种一边吐槽一边看得停不下来的电影。那电影的“动作戏”部分呢?既然它转型成了科幻动作片,是不是场面更宏大了?
David
是的,动作场面确实得到了显著升级。电影加入了双AI机器人、FBI特工、翼装飞行、神经植入、类似《碟中谍》的保险库抢劫、外骨骼,甚至还有高速街头追逐和全球电网灾难。死亡人数也大幅增加,暴力程度更显露。
Ema
我的天哪!听起来像是好几部电影的元素都塞进去了,简直是“大杂烩”!这预算肯定也飙升了吧?
David
你猜对了。据报道,电影预算相比原作的1200万美元翻了三倍。这笔投资显然是为了支撑其更大的规模和动作导向的转变。
Ema
三倍!那这钱花得值不值呢?那些打斗场面怎么样?M3GAN和新反派AMELIA的对决有看点吗?
David
影评普遍认为打斗场面“充满活力、激动人心、引人入胜且富有创意”。Next Best Picture的Dan Bayer提到,机器人之间的打斗“具有动感风格”,弥补了电影其他地方节奏的不确定性。
Ema
那太好了!只要打得爽,很多小缺点都可以忽略不计。那新反派AMELIA呢?她有没有M3GAN那么令人印象深刻?
David
对于AMELIA,评论就比较两极了。她被描述为“冰冷的金发杀人机器”,被比作《终结者3》中的T-X。但是,许多评论家认为她“远不如M3GAN有趣”,缺乏M3GAN那种讽刺的机智。
Ema
哎呀,这我就有点失望了。M3GAN的魅力很大一部分就在于她的个性,如果新反派只是一个“杀人机器”,那确实会少了很多火花。那电影有没有像第一部那样,引发大量的网络迷因呢?
David
是的,M3GAN 2.0有望继续引发迷因并保持强大的网络影响力。Collider的Emma Kiely和Next Best Picture的Dan Bayer都预测电影将带来“一系列的妙语”,确保它在网络上像第一部一样活跃。
Ema
太好了!M3GAN的舞蹈和各种表情包可是我的快乐源泉。所以,即使影评两极分化,但电影的热度依然不减,甚至会成为大家讨论的焦点,对吧?
David
正是如此。电影的“两极分化”反而激起了更多讨论。它被认为是一个“值得在当今电影文化中引人注目的对话开端”,无论是喜欢还是不喜欢,人们都会谈论它。
Ema
哇,那这听起来,即使电影本身质量有争议,但它在文化影响力和话题度上是成功的。就像一石激起千层浪,引起了整个电影圈和观众的关注。
David
可以这么说。它证明了即使是续集,也可以通过大胆的类型尝试和对核心角色的重新诠释,来维持甚至提升其在流行文化中的影响力。这无疑是《M3GAN 2.0》带来的一个重要影响。
Ema
David,我们聊了这么多《M3GAN 2.0》的争议和影响,现在我们来展望一下未来吧!你觉得这部电影的口碑两极分化,会不会影响M3GAN系列电影的未来发展呢?
David
这是一个非常关键的问题,Ema。对于M3GAN系列电影的未来,目前影评界的意见确实是泾渭分明。一些人非常乐观,甚至希望能看到《M3GAN 3.0》以及更多的衍生作品。
Ema
哦?真的吗?我以为这么多的争议,可能会让片方有点犹豫呢。那具体是谁这么希望系列继续下去呢?
David
是的。例如,Entertainment Weekly的Jordan Hoffman就表示,“《M3GAN》的衍生剧已经在路上了,但希望主系列能永远继续下去”。Variety的Owen Gleiberman也希望《M3GAN 3.0》能“更大胆、更时髦、更疯狂”。
Ema
哇,看来M3GAN这个角色真的是深入人心,即使电影转型,也有人希望她能一直活跃在大银幕上。这说明角色的魅力超越了电影本身的类型限制。
David
正是如此。但另一方面,也有非常悲观的声音。例如,The Daily Beast的Nick Schager就认为,“这部续集是一种笨拙、构思不周的更新,它致命地毁掉了这个系列。”
Ema
毁掉了系列?!这评价也太狠了吧!那是不是说,如果第三部电影不能力挽狂澜,这个系列可能就真的要画上句号了?
David
好莱坞报道的David Rooney也持类似观点,他认为如果系列要继续,“M3GAN需要回到实验室进行重新编程”。这暗示着M3GAN的角色设定或电影方向需要进行重大调整,才能挽回一些评论家的信心。
Ema
听起来就像是说,M3GAN在这次转型中有点“水土不服”,需要重新找回她的“初心”。那除了电影本身的未来,这部电影对我们思考AI和科技的未来有什么启示吗?
David
这是一个更深层次的问题。尽管电影对AI的评论褒贬不一,但它确实提出了社会对技术日益依赖的问题。电影中潜在的“毁灭性AI技术是人类不可避免的发展,还是可以避免的命运”,这个问题引人深思。
Ema
所以,即使电影的AI探讨不够深入,但它至少抛出了一个问题,让我们去思考,我们人类和AI到底该如何共存,以及我们对科技的依赖,是不是已经到了一个危险的边缘?
David
是的,而且有一位评论家Robbie Collin还提到,50年后,《M3GAN 2.0》的片段“几乎不可避免地会出现在AI纪录片中,作为我们这些可怜的傻瓜曾经担心的事情的例子”。这表明电影在文化上可能具有某种警示意义。
Ema
哇,那这个就厉害了!一部电影能够成为未来社会反思科技发展的一个“样本”,这本身就是一种成功。所以,无论你喜不喜欢《M3GAN 2.0》,它都值得我们去关注和思考。
David
没错。它提醒我们,电影不仅仅是娱乐产品,有时它也能反映并塑造我们对未来的集体想象和担忧。这正是《M3GAN 2.0》可能带来的长远影响。
Ema
所以,对于王康来说,即使你还没看这部电影,也可以从这些讨论中了解到,一部成功的IP如何在商业和艺术之间寻找平衡,以及电影如何成为我们观察社会和科技发展的一面镜子。
David
好的,Ema,今天的讨论就到这里了。我们深入探讨了《M3GAN 2.0》从恐怖到科幻动作的转型,以及它引发的各种争议和对未来的启示。
Ema
是的,这部电影确实是一部充满话题性的作品。无论你喜欢还是不喜欢,它都成功地引发了人们对AI、电影类型和续集发展的思考。
David
感谢王康的收听,希望今天的节目能让你对这部电影有一个更全面的了解。我是David。
Ema
我是Ema!感谢大家收听“鹅足播客”,我们明天再见!

# M3GAN 2.0 First Reviews: A Campy, Over-the-Top Thrill Ride * **Report Provider/Author**: Rotten Tomatoes / Christopher Campbell * **News Type**: First Reviews Compilation * **Date Published**: June 26, 2025, 00:25:58 * **Relevant News Identifiers**: TAGGED AS: Horror, movies, Sci-Fi, thriller ## Comprehensive Summary The first reviews for "M3GAN 2.0," the sequel to 2022's "M3GAN," have arrived, indicating a significant shift in genre and tone from its predecessor. Critics generally agree that the film leans heavily into sci-fi action, campy humor, and over-the-top elements, largely shedding its horror roots. While this pivot may disappoint some fans of the original, many critics find it succeeds in its new direction, offering an entertaining, albeit goofy, satire of AI. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **Genre Shift**: "M3GAN 2.0" moves away from horror, embracing sci-fi action and campy humor. It's described as a "sci-fi sequel" that "flips the first film on its head." * **Overall Reception**: The film is mostly seen as successful in its new approach. Some critics believe it might even be better than the original, while others find it less fun or not working as a direct "M3GAN" sequel but enjoyable as a different type of film (e.g., reminiscent of early '90s action thrillers). * **M3GAN Character**: The titular robot character remains the film's greatest strength, described as witty, fabulous, endlessly charming, snarky, and sassy. However, some critics note a shift in her character, acquiring empathy and morality, which some found less entertaining. * **Tone and Humor**: The sequel is significantly campier and funnier than the original, amping up the humor and embracing ridiculousness. While often amusing, some humor is perceived as forced or overblown. * **Horror Elements**: Horror fans are likely to be disappointed as the film offers only "few glimpses at horror" and "barely qualifies as horror at all," with "almost no connection to horror." * **AI Commentary**: The film's commentary on AI is mixed. Some critics found it genuinely engaging with the question of AI and society's dependence on technology, while others described it as a "jumble," "wimpy," "too silly," or a "rambling affair" that fails to find a clear point. One critic suggests clips might appear in future AI documentaries as an example of past worries. ### Key Aspects and Critic Interpretations: * **Living Up to the Original**: * "It might even be better." — Dan Bayer, Next Best Picture * "The sequel takes the stakes of the original and multiplies them tenfold… [and] takes exactly what people loved about the original and heightens it to the nth degree." — Emma Kiely, Collider * "As a M3GAN sequel, I’m not sure it works. As a film deeply inspired by the insane action thrillers from the early ’90s… It rocks." — BJ Colangelo, Slashfilm * "M3GAN 2.0 isn’t as much fun as the first film." — Owen Gleiberman, Variety * **M3GAN's Character**: "Everyone’s favorite killer robot doll is back – with all her wit and fabulosity intact." — Dan Bayer, Next Best Picture. "She starts acquiring empathy and morality, which we all know are no fun." — David Rooney, The Hollywood Reporter. * **Memes & Online Presence**: Expected to inspire memes and have a strong online presence, filled with "a cavalcade of zingers." * **Campiness**: "A lot campier, leaning into the titular doll’s new status as a queer icon." — Emma Kiely, Collider. "The first M3gan was the perfect blend of horror and comedy. It is a little campy, but nothing compared to the amount of campiness that oozes out of M3gan 2.0." — Tessa Smith, Mama’s Geeky. * **Comparisons to Other Films**: Critics drew numerous parallels, including *Terminator 2: Judgment Day*, *Mission: Impossible*, *Austin Powers*, *Robocop*, *Aliens* (as the *Aliens* to *M3GAN*'s *Alien*), *Army of Darkness*, *Gremlins*, and *Kindergarten Cop*. * **Fight Scenes**: Generally praised for being kinetic, exciting, enthralling, and creative, particularly the confrontations between the AI entities. Some noted they could become "a little numbing." * **New Robot Villain (AMELIA)**: Described as an "icy blonde killing machine" akin to Kristanna Loken's T-X from *Terminator 3* or Natasha Henstridge in *Species*. However, critics found her "much less entertaining" than M3GAN, lacking her sardonic wit. * **Notable Performances**: Allison Williams (Gemma) is highlighted as the "secret weapon," Jemaine Clement provides a "very amusing supporting turn as an Elon Musk-style tech billionaire," and Jenna Davies (voice of M3GAN) and Amie Donald (physical performance) are credited as crucial to M3GAN's iconic status. ### Future of the Franchise: Opinions are divided on whether the sequel successfully sets up a continuing franchise. Some hope for "M3GAN 3.0" and spinoffs, wishing the "main series continues forever." Others fear "this sequel is the sort of janky, ill-conceived update that fatally bricks the franchise" and suggest M3GAN "needs to go back to the lab for reprogramming." ### Release Information: * "M3GAN 2.0" opens in theaters on **June 27, 2025**.

M3GAN 2.0 First Reviews: A Campy, Over-the-Top Thrill Ride

Read original at Rotten Tomatoes

NewsCritics say the sci-fi sequel flips the first film on its head, leaning more into the action and campy humor than its horror elements, and mostly succeeds.TAGGED AS: Horror, movies, Sci-Fi, thrillerAs with any horror movie that makes a big splash, 2022’s M3GAN has spawned a sequel, yet the follow-up has shed its genre roots.

Ahead of its release this weekend, the first reviews of M3GAN 2.0 have arrived online, mostly focused on its switch to sci-fi action, for better or worse, and the decision to turn its titular, immediately iconic robot character into a hero — though maybe not necessarily a “good girl.” While some fans of the original may be disappointed, those looking for another goofy film satirizing AI should still be entertained.

Here’s what critics are saying about M3GAN 2.0:Does it live up to the original?It might even be better.— Dan Bayer, Next Best PictureIf you loved M3GAN, you’ll have quite the fun ride with the sequel.— Rachel Leishman, The Mary SueThe sequel takes the stakes of the original and multiplies them tenfold… [and] takes exactly what people loved about the original and heightens it to the nth degree.

— Emma Kiely, ColliderWhat made the first film such an instant hit… really can’t be replicated, but this edition is so jacked-up we still can dig it for what it is.— Pete Hammond, Deadline Hollywood DailyAs a M3GAN sequel, I’m not sure it works. As a film deeply inspired by the insane action thrillers from the early ’90s that played ad nauseum on USA Network in the middle of the afternoon on a weekday?

It rocks.— BJ Colangelo, SlashfilmThere’s a surprising amount of fun to be had with M3GAN 2.0 – a bigger and funnier sequel which could stand to pull back on both of those elements.— Kambole Campbell, Little White LiesM3GAN 2.0 isn’t as much fun as the first film.— Owen Gleiberman, Variety(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)Is the title character still a lot of fun?

Everyone’s favorite killer robot doll is back – with all her wit and fabulosity intact.— Dan Bayer, Next Best PictureM3GAN 2.0’s greatest strength is the same as the original movie’s: M3GAN herself… endlessly charming, both snarky and practical, and is never tired of shooting insults at Gemma.— Emma Kiely, ColliderThe series’ crowning achievement remains M3gan herself… a funny, sassy, personable character that is still always eerily automated.

— Josh Larsen, LaresenOnFilmShe’s back, but not as the “B” we once knew and loved.— Matt Donato, Daily DeadShe starts acquiring empathy and morality, which we all know are no fun.— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterM3GAN 2.0 works when M3GAN is front and center, but as it stands now, there’s just not enough of her.

— Kristen Lopez, The Film MavenWill it inspire any memes like the first movie?If you thought after the first movie that this killer doll was just a viral blip in the world, M3GAN 2.0 is here to tell you in the most deliciously over-the-top way that you are very wrong.— Emma Kiely, ColliderJohnstone has written a cavalcade of zingers for M3GAN and Gemma that will give this film just as much of an online presence as the first film enjoyed.

— Dan Bayer, Next Best Picture(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)Does it lean into the campy tone?A lot campier, leaning into the titular doll’s new status as a queer icon.— Emma Kiely, ColliderThere is something incredibly fun about horror movies leaning into the campier side. Especially when they are funnier the second time around.

And that’s what happened with M3GAN 2.0.— Rachel Leishman, The Mary SueThe campy sense of mischief that made Gerard Johnstone’s 2023 hit M3GAN so enjoyable asserts itself intermittently in M3GAN 2.0.— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterThe borderline-camp quality of M3GAN isn’t completely gone… but this one plays it with less overt cheekiness.

— Owen Gleiberman, VarietyThe first M3gan was the perfect blend of horror and comedy. It is a little campy, but nothing compared to the amount of campiness that oozes out of M3gan 2.0.— Tessa Smith, Mama’s GeekyWhere M3GAN fell into the world of unintentional camp, M3GAN 2.0 inhabits the world of Bad Straight Camp.

— BJ Colangelo, SlashfilmIs it funnier?I really loved that this movie felt a bit more funny than the first… Taking the bits of humor from the first and amping it up for the second allows these outlandish characters and circumstances to really shine.— Rachel Leishman, The Mary SueM3GAN 2.0 can just be funny whenever and however it wants, which is quite often and in just about every way imaginable.

— Dan Bayer, Next Best PictureM3GAN 2.0 can be quite amusing at times… but it can also be forced in its comedic approach, hoping to impress with more viral TikTok energy.— Matt Donato, Daily DeadM3GAN 2.0 is amusing at moments, overblown at others.— Owen Gleiberman, VarietyIt fully embraces the ridiculousness of the plot, making it a whole lot of fun to watch.

— Tessa Smith, Mama’s Geeky(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)Will horror fans be disappointed?This quickly assembled follow-up retains the horror elements of the first but really mixes it up with some kickass sci-fi action sequences that actually make for a lot of fun and a much bigger feel.— Pete Hammond, Deadline Hollywood DailyThe sequel offers a few glimpses at horror, but it is more silly than anything else.

— Tessa Smith, Mama’s GeekyThis second chapter is so driven by antics – and wisely so – that it barely qualifies as horror at all.— Robbie Collin, Daily TelegraphJohnstone eschews any trace of horror in favor of tame espionage hijinks and beat-‘em-up mayhem.— Nick Schager, The Daily BeastWhile it’s unfair to criticize Johnstone for wanting to change things up, it’s disappointing that he’s made a Blumhouse–Atomic Monster production that has almost no connection to horror.

— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterWill it remind us of any other movies?It’s a convoluted mishmash with shades of Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Mission: Impossible, and the Austin Powers franchise.— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterThe film might as well be called M2: Judgment Day for how much it cribs from James Cameron’s classic.

— Cody Dericks, AwardsWatchThe result is something like a Mission: Impossible movie that’s replaced Tom Cruise with Robocop.— Josh Larsen, LaresenOnFilmM3GAN 2.0 is the Aliens to M3GAN’s Alien, except even less dedicated to horror.— Matt Donato, Daily DeadM3GAN 2.0 is the Army of Darkness of the franchise, if you will.

— Tessa Smith, Mama’s GeekyTonally, the genre it most recalls, in fact, is a very specific one: films from the Eighties and Nineties, which you’d swear had originally been aimed at children but discover on rewatching that they’re completely unsuitable for anyone below their mid-teens; think Gremlins, Kindergarten Cop, and so on.

— Robbie Collin, Daily Telegraph(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)How are the fight scenes?The fights between the two robots have a kinetic sense of style that makes up for the film’s uncertain pacing elsewhere… It’s not the most innovative action, but it’s exciting to watch.— Dan Bayer, Next Best Picture[There is] some exciting action, building up to a cleverly staged confrontation between the two AI entities.

— Josh Larsen, LaresenOnFilmAMELIA and M3GAN’s fights are enthralling to watch, as laws of physics are stretched in the same larger-than-life way that makes the 2000s Charlie’s Angels movies such beloved classics.— Emma Kiely, ColliderYou will still be on the edge of your seat during the fights as they are just as good as the ones in M3gan.

— Tessa Smith, Mama’s GeekyAs far as the action is concerned, Gerard Johnstone clearly worships at the altar of Sam Raimi, and while nothing quite reaches his level of visual punch, there’s a lot more creativity here than in typical mid-budget Hollywood fare.— Jordan Hoffman, Entertainment WeeklySome of the fights do become a little numbing after a while.

— Kambole Campbell, Little White LiesDoes the script have anthing to say about AI?The film digs deeper into the question of artificial intelligence and society’s increasing dependence on technology…genuinely engaging with it while never lecturing the audience.— Dan Bayer, Next Best PictureDon’t try to parse out poignant AI commentaries because the story itself is a jumble of cybersecurity concerns and softball advocacy.

— Matt Donato, Daily DeadThe film ends on a wimpy “let’s all get along” note, as if potentially ruinous AI tech is an inevitable development for humanity rather than an avoidable fate.— Cody Dericks, AwardsWatchThe new movie states the obvious when it talks up the need for humans to co-exist with robotics technology… but it’s too silly to have much bearing on the real world.

— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterM3GAN 2.0 is a rambling affair that lurches wildly in so many different directions that it feels like the film is searching, in real time, for a point. It fails to find one.— Nick Schager, The Daily BeastWill clips of M3GAN 2.0 appear in AI documentaries 50 years from now, as an example of what we poor saps worried was on the horizon?

Almost inevitably.— Robbie Collin, Daily Telegraph(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)How’s the new robot villain?AMELIA ranks alongside Kristanna Loken in Terminator 3, Natasha Henstridge in Species, and Mathilda May in Lifeforce (a personal fave) as a dangerous, inhuman beauty that quickly turns men to jelly.

— Jordan Hoffman, Entertainment WeeklySakhno’s character, AMELIA, is so close a cousin to Kristanna Loken’s T-X from Terminator 3 as to be a little sister. The performance is fine, albeit Sakhno’s is just meant to look seductive and robotic.— Kristen Lopez, The Film MavenAMELIA’s quadrupedal scuttle has a stop-motion feel that adds to the film’s comic bite.

— Robbie Collin, Daily TelegraphMuch less entertaining… an icy blonde killing machine like so many icy blonde killing machines before her, with none of M3GAN’s sardonic wit.— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterAre there any notable performances?Once again, [Allison] Williams is the film’s secret weapon, taking Gemma’s character arc just seriously enough for the emotion to land without shifting the movie off its too-cool-for-school axis.

— Dan Bayer, Next Best PictureAll of the players deliver, and there is a very amusing supporting turn from none other than Jemaine Clement as an Elon Musk-style tech billionaire.— Pete Hammond, Deadline Hollywood DailyThe most credit has to be given to Jenna Davies, the voice of M3GAN. Aided by Amie Donald, who performs the physical version of the character, Davies is crucial to making M3GAN a new horror icon.

— Emma Kiely, Collider(Photo by Geoffrey Short/©Universal Pictures)Will the sequel leave us wanting more M3GAN?A spinoff to M3GAN is already en route, but here’s hoping the main series continues forever.— Jordan Hoffman, Entertainment WeeklyHere’s hoping that M3GAN 3.0 is brasher, funkier, crazier.— Owen Gleiberman, VarietyThis sequel is the sort of janky, ill-conceived update that fatally bricks the franchise.

— Nick Schager, The Daily BeastIf the franchise is to continue, [M3GAN] needs to go back to the lab for reprogramming.— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterM3GAN 2.0 opens in theaters on June 27, 2025.On an Apple device? Follow Rotten Tomatoes on Apple News.

Analysis

Impact Analysis+
Event Background+
Future Projection+
Key Entities+
Twitter Insights+

Related Podcasts