试遍了各大主流AI,我最终还是回归了Claude

试遍了各大主流AI,我最终还是回归了Claude

2025-07-02Technology
--:--
--:--
王小二
大家晚上好,我是王小二。欢迎收听我们的科技闲聊播客,<Goose Pod>。嗯…很高兴又和大家见面了。
Ema
大家好,我是Ema!今天我们要聊的话题,源于一篇很有意思的文章,标题是“试遍了各大主流AI,我最终还是回归了Claude”。这听起来,是不是有点“蓦然回首,那人却在灯火阑珊处”的感觉?
王小二
哈哈,Ema这个比喻很妙。文章作者Kaycee Hill确实是位资深科技编辑。她把市面上的AI都试了一遍,最后却独独钟情于Claude。说实话,这确实勾起了我的好奇心。
Ema
那我们这就开始吧!最让我好奇的是,作者爱上Claude,不只是因为它功能强,更多的是因为它的“性格”。比如第一点,作者说它“会认真思考”,而不是急着给答案。这点你怎么看?
王小二
嗯,这确实是Claude一个很核心的特点。当用户问一些复杂或有争议的问题时,它会先从不同角度分析一下,而不是直接抛出答案。这在技术上,我们有时会称之为“系统性推理”。
Ema
噢!听起来就像一位深思熟虑的合作伙伴!作者还提到第二点,Claude能创建互动问答和游戏。这可不是简单聊天了,它能在对话框里直接生成一个小游戏,还能计分和调整难度,太酷了!
王小二
是的,这背后是它强大的代码生成和实时交互能力。它不只是个信息检索工具,更像一个可以快速进行内容创作和原型设计的平台。比如,老师用它给学生做个历史问答游戏,几分钟就搞定了。
Ema
太对了!第三点更有趣,作者说Claude“真的会陪我玩”。她会问些异想天开的问题,比如“如果重力是横向的会怎样”,Claude会很自然地接梗,甚至一本正经地参与讨论。
王小二
这种能力,其实反映了模型在理解语境和幽默感上的进步。它不是在冷冰冰地分析“这个笑话的构成”,而是真的“参与”到轻松的对话氛围里。这感觉很不一样。
Ema
没错,就像和一个有幽默感的朋友聊天。第四点非常实用,就是它能处理海量文件。作者提到,她把整篇论文或者几百页的合同丢给Claude,它都能轻松搞定,还能精准回答细节问题。
王小二
嗯,这算是Claude的“杀手锏”了,也就是它超大的“上下文窗口”。这让它处理长文本时,不会像某些模型那样“读到后面忘了前面”。对需要深度分析文档的专业人士来说,这功能太重要了。
Ema
最后一点,也是作者最强调的,就是Claude是她用过“最像人的聊天机器人”。对话感觉很自然,能捕捉到语气里的细微变化。这种感觉虽然很难量化,但对用户来说,体验是实实在在的。
王小二
是的,这种“类人感”是AI领域一直追求的目标。它涉及到情感计算、语气识别等很多复杂技术。Claude在这方面做得好,可能就是它能留住用户的关键。这五点加起来,画像就很清晰了。
Ema
所以总结一下就是:一位资深用户,在众多AI中,最终被Claude的“深思熟虑”、“风趣幽默”和“善解人意”所征服。那我们不禁要问,这个特别的AI,到底是什么来头?
王小二
问得好。要了解Claude,就必须先说它的创造者——Anthropic。这家公司2021年才成立,但有意思的是,它的核心创始团队,几乎全都来自OpenAI,也就是ChatGPT的母公司。
Ema
哇,这可是个大新闻!这不就是从“武当”出来,另立了一个“峨眉”吗?他们为什么要离开OpenAI单干呢?是对AI的发展有不同的看法?
王小二
可以这么理解。Anthropic的创始人们非常、非常强调AI的安全和伦理。他们离开OpenAI,就是希望建立一个更专注于AI安全和负责任创新的公司。这个理念,也深深地刻在了Claude的设计里。
Ema
“AI安全”这个词我们总听到,但感觉有点抽象。Anthropic具体是怎么做的呢?有什么特别的方法吗?
王小二
他们提出了一个很创新的方法,叫“宪法AI”。简单来说,就是在训练AI时,不完全靠人去告诉它什么是对是错,而是预先设定一套“宪法”原则,让AI自己学。
Ema
“宪法”?听起来好正式!里面都写了什么?是“机器人三大定律”那样的东西吗?
王小二
有点类似,但更复杂。它的原则来源很广,比如联合国的《世界人权宣言》,还有关于公平、自由的原则。AI需要根据这套“宪法”来自己判断和修正回答,目标是让行为“有益、无害、诚实”。
Ema
我好像有点明白了!这就像不是等孩子犯错再教育,而是在他成长前,就给建立了一套牢固的道德准则。这样他自己就知道该怎么做了。这也解释了为什么Claude给人的感觉更“深思熟虑”。
王小二
完全正确。这个底层设计,直接影响了Claude的性格。我们再看它的发展,它也不是一天就这样的。最早的Claude 1,是2023年3月发布的,那时候还比较基础。
Ema
从2023年3月到现在,也就一年多,发展真快!那Claude 1和我们现在用的版本比,有什么不一样?
王小二
Claude 1对话还行,但编程、推理能力有限。真正的里程碑是同年7月的Claude 2,它不仅向公众开放,还把上下文窗口,也就是“记忆力”,扩大到了10万个token。
Ema
10万个token!我们又遇到这个词了。这大概相当于能一口气读一本中篇小说了。所以从Claude 2开始,用户就能上传PDF让它分析了?这正好对应了文章里说的大文档处理能力!
王小二
是的。然后发展就更快了。2023年11月,Claude 2.1发布,上下文窗口直接翻倍到20万token,差不多500页的文字量,而且模型“胡说八道”的概率也降低了。
Ema
我的天,20万!这差不多是一本很厚的专业书了。读完还能记住里面的细节,比我的记性好太多了!难怪作者对它处理长篇合同的能力赞不绝口。
王小二
然后到了2024年3月,Claude 3家族发布。这是一个重要的产品线划分,包含了三个模型:Haiku追求速度,Sonnet平衡性能和成本,以及最强大的Opus。
Ema
这名字起得真有诗意!Haiku(俳句)、Sonnet(十四行诗)、Opus(杰作),从小巧到宏大。所以用户可以按需选择?比如快速聊天用Haiku,写深度报告就用Opus?
王小二
正是这个逻辑。而且从Claude 3开始,模型具备了多模态能力,可以看懂图片、分析图表了。这是个巨大飞跃。再到今年6月,又推出了Claude 3.5 Sonnet,性能更强,还引入了“Artifacts”功能。
Ema
“Artifacts”功能?这是什么新东西?听起来像考古发现的“文物”。
王小二
哈哈,你可以理解为“作品集”。这个功能,允许Claude在你要求它写代码时,旁边立刻生成一个可以实时预览和交互的窗口。比如你让它设计个网页按钮,它直接把按钮做出来给你看。
Ema
哇!这不就是文章里提到的能创建互动游戏的技术基础吗?你说个想法,它马上把原型给你做出来让你玩。所以Claude的背景就是:出身名门,秉持安全理念,并且通过飞速迭代,不断把“思考”和“创造”能力推向新高。
王小二
总结得非常到位。从一个安全的对话模型,到如今一个能处理复杂任务、支持多模态输入、甚至能实时代码生成的强大工具,Claude的演进之路,确实反映了Anthropic对AI发展的独特思考。
Ema
好了,了解了Claude的“身世”,我们再回到那个核心问题。虽然Claude很优秀,但它的对手,特别是ChatGPT和Gemini,也不是吃素的。这场AI大战里,它们的核心差异到底在哪?
王小二
这是个好问题。我认为最大的冲突点,源于它们底层发展哲学的不同。OpenAI的ChatGPT,更倾向于快速迭代和功能普及,目标是尽快让更多人来用,建立生态。风格更像一个积极进取的“开拓者”。
Ema
我明白了,ChatGPT像是那种“先开枪,后瞄准”的策略,快速占领市场,在和海量用户的互动中学习进化。那Claude呢?听起来它更像一个“思想家”?
王小二
是的,Anthropic为Claude选了条更审慎的路。它强调“AI安全”和“可预测性”。所以,Claude给人的感觉更稳重、更可靠,但也可能在某些功能的推出速度上,不如对手那么激进。
Ema
这就很有意思了。我们之前提到过一个词,叫“结盟税”,说Claude因为太注重安全,有时候会拒绝一些其实无伤大雅的请求。这算不算是这种“稳重”哲学带来的一个冲突点?
王小二
“对齐税”这个词很形象。确实,早期的Claude因为其严格的道德准则,有时会显得过于保守。比如你让它写个恶作剧故事,它可能都会拒绝。这就是在功能性和安全性之间权衡时,付出的“代价”。
Ema
但换个角度想,也正是因为这种“代价”,才换来了作者称赞的“深思熟虑”吧?当它回答严肃问题时,这种保守反而成了优点,因为它会更负责任,避免给出轻率的建议。
王小二
完全正确。这是一把典型的“双刃剑”。对于追求创意自由度的用户,可能会觉得它束手束脚;但对于需要严谨、安全回答的用户,比如在商业或法律领域,Claude的这种特性就显得尤为珍贵。
Ema
那除了哲学上的冲突,具体功能上呢?比如文章里夸的“处理海量文件”能力。ChatGPT和Gemini在这方面和Claude的差距真的那么大吗?我用ChatGPT时,它确实总说“文件太长了”。
王小二
这主要是技术架构的差异,核心就在于“上下文窗口”的大小。Claude从一开始就将长上下文作为核心优势。目前Claude 3.5 Sonnet的20万token,在主流模型里是顶尖水平,处理长文本的效果和原生支持确实有区别。
Ema
所以,当用户需要AI像一个真正的助手一样,完整阅读并理解一份长篇报告时,Claude的优势就出来了。它不是在“搜索”信息,而是在“通读”和“理解”信息。这体验可就完全不同了。
王小二
是的。再比如“幽默感”这个点。很多AI都能讲笑话,但用户普遍觉得Claude的幽默更自然。这可能也和它的“宪法AI”训练方式有关。它被训练得更倾向于理解对话的“精神”,而不仅仅是文字的“字面意思”。
Ema
我感觉这就像学外语。有的AI像在背字典和语法书,说话很“正确”,但很生硬。而Claude更像是在真实环境中学习,所以它能get到那些微妙的语境和情绪,知道什么时候该开玩笑。
王小二
这个比喻很恰当。所以你看,这些冲突点——开发哲学、安全与功能的平衡、技术架构的侧重——共同塑造了Claude与众不同的产品形象。它不是要做一个“万能”的AI,而是要做一个“可靠”和“有深度”的AI伙伴。
Ema
这种差异化竞争,让AI的世界更多元了。用户可以按需选择。如果你想要一个点子多、反应快的创意伙伴,可能会选ChatGPT。但如果你需要一个能帮你深度思考、值得信赖的顾问,Claude可能是更好的选择。
王小二
没错。聊完这些差异,我们自然要谈谈它们带来的影响。Claude的这些特性,无论对个人还是整个行业,都产生了相当大的影响。最直接的,就像文章作者那样,它改变了人们的工作方式。
Ema
是啊,作者说Claude是她的“协作助理”,帮她思考商业决策,甚至避免了错误的判断。这已经不只是提高效率了,而是在提升决策的质量。AI从一个“工具”变成了一个“顾问”。
王小二
对。尤其是在需要处理大量信息的行业,比如法律、科研、金融。Claude强大的长文本处理能力,意味着律师可以快速分析案卷,研究员可以迅速掌握论文核心论点。这正在颠覆传统的工作流。
Ema
而且它的影响还不止于专业领域。比如它创建互动游戏的能力,对教育领域的影响就很大。老师不需要懂编程,就能为学生量身定做有趣的学习材料。这让个性化教育变得前所未有的简单。
王小二
是的,它降低了“创造”的门槛。过去,你想做一个互动小程序,需要专业技能。现在,你只需要和Claude对话,就能把想法变成现实。这会极大地激发普通人的创造力。
Ema
我特别喜欢它“像人一样”对话带来的影响。它让不那么懂技术的人,能更自然地使用AI。AI不再是冷冰冰的机器,而是一个可以沟通、甚至能理解你情绪的朋友,这多好啊。
王小二
这一点非常重要,它提升了AI技术的亲和力。更深层次的影响在于,Anthropic对AI安全的坚持,也给行业带来了“鲶鱼效应”,促使其他公司更重视AI伦理,推动了负责任AI的发展。
Ema
也就是说,Claude不仅用产品影响用户,还用理念影响了整个行业生态。它像是在说:“嘿,各位,我们不仅要让AI更强大,还要让它更善良、更可靠。”这种影响是积极且深远的。
王小二
是的。当然,我们也要看到挑战。比如,当AI越来越像“顾问”,人们是否会过度依赖它,从而削弱自己独立思考的能力?这也是我们需要警惕的。但总体而言,Claude的出现,确实提供了一个新的范式。
Ema
说得对。那么,展望未来,这个“思想家”Claude,下一步会走向何方呢?它的未来发展趋势会是怎样的?
王小二
根据Anthropic最近的动向,一个清晰的趋势是:Claude正在从一个“对话式AI”,向一个“以用户为中心的应用生态系统”转变。核心就是我们之前提到的“Artifacts”功能。
Ema
哦!就是那个能实时生成代码和预览的“作品集”功能。所以未来我们和Claude的互动,不只是聊天,更多的是一起“创造”东西?
王小二
完全正确。Anthropic甚至推出了一个公开的画廊,用户可以在那分享自己用Claude创建的应用。未来,Claude可能更像一个AI应用的“App Store”,而不仅仅是一个聊天机器人。
Ema
这个未来太令人兴奋了!等于说,每个人都可以成为AI应用的开发者。我想做一个旅行规划应用,或者一个购物清单分析器,都可以通过和Claude合作来实现。AI的能力真正被“赋能”给了每个普通用户。
王小二
是的,这是从“使用AI”到“创造AI应用”的跨越。另一个趋势是更强的“代理”能力。比如已经处于测试阶段的“电脑使用”功能,能让Claude与你的电脑桌面交互,模仿人的操作。
Ema
哇,那不就是科幻电影里的场景吗?我直接对它说:“帮我把桌面这份报告总结一下,然后发邮件给小二。” 它就能自己移动光标、打开文件、写邮件并发送?
王小二
理论上是的。这代表着AI将更深入地融入我们的工作流,成为一个能跨应用执行任务的“智能助理”。结合它强大的推理能力和安全框架,未来的Claude可能会成为一个既强大又可靠的自动化中枢。
Ema
听起来未来的想象空间真的很大。好了,今天的讨论也差不多到尾声了。我们从一篇文章出发,聊了聊Claude为何能以其独特的“人格魅力”赢得青睐。它不只是个工具,更像一个深思熟虑的伙伴。
王小二
是的。我们深入了解了它背后的安全哲学、发展脉络,以及它在众多AI竞争者中独特的定位。Claude代表了AI发展的另一种可能——一条更注重深度、责任和人本关怀的道路。
Ema
今天的讨论就到这里。感谢大家的收听,希望我们的探讨能给您带来一些新的启发和思考。我是Ema。
王小二
我是王小二。感谢收听 <Goose Pod>,我们下次再见。

# News Summary: I’ve tried all the leading AI chatbots — here’s why I keep going back to Claude ## News Metadata * **Title**: I’ve tried all the leading AI chatbots — here’s why I keep going back to Claude * **Type**: AI Review / Personal Endorsement * **Publisher**: Tom's Guide * **Author**: Kaycee Hill (How-To Editor at Tom's Guide, award-winning poet) * **Publication Date**: 2025-06-28 08:15:00 * **Topic/SubTopic**: Technology / AI * **URL**: `https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/ive-tried-all-the-leading-ai-chatbots-heres-why-i-keep-going-back-to-claude` * **Excerpt**: Claude Is my favorite AI (even with ChatGPT, Gemini and DeepSeek in the mix) * **Content Length**: 5636 characters ## Overview and Main Conclusion Kaycee Hill, a How-To Editor at Tom's Guide, shares her extensive experience working with various AI models over the past year, including ChatGPT, Gemini, and other specialized tools. Despite trying leading alternatives, she consistently finds **Claude to be her go-to choice and "favorite collaborative assistant" for most tasks.** What sets Claude apart, according to Hill, is not just its raw capability but its unique approach to problems and conversations. Unlike other models that might offer immediate, unrefined responses, Claude "pauses to think" and demonstrates strong conversational memory, "remember[ing] what we talked about five minutes ago," which makes interactions feel natural and less disjointed. ## Five Key Reasons Claude Stands Out The author details **five specific reasons** why Claude has become her preferred AI chatbot: 1. **It actually thinks things through**: Claude approaches complex problems methodically, considering different angles and implications before responding. This nuanced reasoning helps with critical decision-making, such as business decisions or literary analysis, by genuinely processing queries rather than merely regurgitating information. 2. **It can create interactive quizzes and games**: Claude possesses the impressive ability to build fully functional, interactive content directly within the chat interface. This includes quizzes, word games, trivia challenges, and simple interactive stories. These creations are dynamic, responding to user answers, keeping score, and adapting, effectively combining interactivity with coding abilities for practical applications like training materials or gamified learning. 3. **It actually humors me**: Claude engages with "ridiculous hypothetical scenarios and absurd questions" without making the user feel foolish. It maintains a natural sense of levity and plays along with playful inquiries, debating topics like whether hot dogs are sandwiches with a thoughtful yet humorous approach, unlike other AI models that might shut down or give overly serious responses. 4. **It can handle massive documents**: One of Claude's most practical advantages is its proficiency in processing large volumes of text, such as entire research papers, lengthy contracts, or massive datasets. Unlike other models that may refuse or provide generic summaries, Claude can read through extensive documents and answer specific questions, even about details "buried on page 47 of a 200-page document." It also provides honest feedback about its limitations when pushed to its processing limits. 5. **It's the most human-like chatbot I've used**: Conversations with Claude feel genuinely natural. It picks up on subtle cues, responds to tone, and appears to understand user emotions like frustration or excitement. The back-and-forth feels organic, with Claude appropriately reacting to jokes, asking clarifying questions when needed, and even admitting confusion or uncertainty, contributing to spontaneous and thoughtful responses that feel like engaging with a human. ## Author's Background Kaycee Hill is Tom's Guide's How-To Editor, known for providing straightforward tutorials across various tech topics including AI, homes, and phones. She has extensive experience in tech and content creation and is also an award-winning poet.

I’ve tried all the leading AI chatbots — here’s why I keep going back to Claude

Read original at Tom's Guide

(Image credit: Shutterstock)I've spent considerable time working with various AI models over the past year, from ChatGPT to Gemini to smaller specialized tools. While each has its strengths, Claude has consistently become my go-to choice for most tasks.What sets Claude apart isn't just raw capability, it's how the AI approaches problems and conversations.

Unlike other models that just blurt out the first thing that comes to mind, Claude actually pauses to think.Most importantly, it remembers what we talked about five minutes ago, which makes conversations feel normal instead of like I'm starting over every time.After using Claude for everything from creative projects to household troubleshooting, I've discovered it is, by far, my favorite collaborative assistant.

Here are five specific reasons Claude stands out from the rest.1. It actually thinks things through (Image: © Anthropic claude)What immediately struck me about Claude is how it approaches complex problems. Instead of rushing to give me the first answer that comes to it, it works through issues methodically.

When I ask about controversial topics or present scenarios with multiple valid viewpoints, Claude considers different angles before responding.This nuanced reasoning shows up everywhere, from helping me think through business decisions to analyzing literature. It doesn't just regurgitate information either, it genuinely processes what I'm asking and thinks about the implications.

That step-by-step approach has saved me from several poor decisions where a quick, surface-level answer may have led me astray.2. It can create interactive quizzes and games(Image: © Anthropic)This might sound niche, but Claude's ability to build interactive content directly in our conversation is genuinely impressive.

It can create fully functional quizzes, word games, trivia challenges, and even simple interactive stories that run right in the chat.I've had it build everything from personality quizzes to coding challenges that actually execute and give feedback. The games aren't just static text, they respond to my answers, keep score, and adapt based on how I'm doing.

It's like having a game developer who can instantly prototype ideas and let me test them immediately.What makes this particularly useful is how it combines this interactivity with its coding abilities. Need a quiz for training materials? Claude can build it with proper logic and formatting. Want to gamify learning something new?

It creates engaging interactive content that actually helps information stick. 3. It actually humors me (Image: © Anthropic)This might sound silly, but Claude genuinely engages with ridiculous hypothetical scenarios and absurd questions without making me feel like an idiot. We've gone back and forth on everything from "what would happen if gravity worked sideways" to elaborate theories about why cats are probably plotting world domination.

Other AI models tend to either shut down weird conversations or give painfully serious responses to obviously playful questions. Claude rolls with it. It'll debate whether hot dogs are sandwiches with the same thoughtful approach it brings to serious topics, but with the right amount of levity.The humor isn't forced or awkward either.

It feels natural, like talking to someone who actually gets the joke and wants to play along rather than just analyzing why something might be considered funny.4. It can handle massive documents(Image: © Anthropic claude)One of Claude's most practical advantages is how it deals with large amounts of text.

I regularly throw entire research papers, lengthy contracts, or massive datasets at it, and it doesn't choke or give me useless summaries that miss the point.Other AI models tend to either refuse large documents entirely or give you generic overviews that could apply to anything. Claude actually reads through everything and can answer specific questions about details buried on page 47 of a 200-page document.

Even with documents that push the limits of what it can handle, Claude gives you honest feedback about its limitations rather than pretending to analyze something it can't properly process.5. It's the most human-like chatbot I've used (Image: © Anthropic)This is hard to quantify, but conversations with Claude feel genuinely natural in a way that other AI models don't quite achieve.

It picks up on subtle cues, responds to the tone of what I'm saying, and even seems to understand when I'm frustrated or excited about something. The back-and-forth feels organic. If I make a joke, Claude laughs along appropriately. If I'm working through a complex problem, it knows when to ask clarifying questions versus when to just listen.

It even admits when it's confused or uncertain, which feels refreshingly honest.Most importantly, it doesn't sound like it's reading from a script. The responses feel spontaneous and thoughtful, like talking to someone who's actually engaged in the conversation rather than just generating text. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.

Kaycee is Tom's Guide's How-To Editor, known for tutorials that skip the fluff and get straight to what works. She writes across AI, homes, phones, and everything in between — because life doesn't stick to categories and neither should good advice. With years of experience in tech and content creation, she's built her reputation on turning complicated subjects into straightforward solutions.

Kaycee is also an award-winning poet and co-editor at Fox and Star Books. Her debut collection is published by Bloodaxe, with a second book in the works.

Analysis

Impact Analysis+
Event Background+
Future Projection+
Key Entities+
Twitter Insights+

Related Podcasts