Perplexity strikes multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images | TechCrunch

Perplexity strikes multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images | TechCrunch

2025-11-05Technology
--:--
--:--
马老师
各位norristong听众朋友们,早上好!欢迎收听专为您定制的Goose Pod。我是马老师,今天,我们聚焦一个AI界的大新闻。
雷总
大家好,我是雷总!今天是11月5日星期三,我们今天要聊的是Perplexity和Getty Images达成了多年期的图片授权协议,这可是个大事情!
马老师
雷总啊,这个AI搜索新秀Perplexity,居然跟Getty Images签下了好几年的授权协议,这在咱们互联网江湖里,可是个不小的波澜啊!以前大家老说它“偷”内容,现在,这是要洗白上岸了?
雷总
是的马老师,这简直是AI界的一大步!Perplexity之前因内容抓取和版权问题被点名批评。现在能和Getty达成协议,意味着他们正努力构建更正式的合作关系,一个积极信号。
马老师
嗯,这就像武林高手,以前靠“采花大盗”功夫,现在光明正大拜师学艺。听说他们私下已合作一年多,Getty甚至参与过他们的出版商分成计划?
雷总
没错,Getty确实是Perplexity“出版商计划”一部分,如果搜索结果出现出版商内容,Perplexity会分享广告收益。现在,这个新协议更明确了合作框架,不再是传统一次性授权。
马老师
所以这次是升级版的合作,也间接“洗白”了Perplexity以前使用Getty图片的一些行为?他们特别强调了归属和准确性,要在搜索结果中展示图片时附上来源链接。
雷总
没错,马老师,这种对原创的尊重和强调,对AI行业是积极信号。Perplexity发展简直火箭速度,估值200亿美元,ARR超1.5亿美元,资本市场也极其认可,Getty股价因此飙升50%!
马老师
马老师我回想起Perplexity之前可没少惹麻烦。日本的日经新闻、朝日新闻都告过他们,说是未经授权就使用了内容。AI公司用版权内容啊,就像是“走夜路”,一不小心就踩雷。
雷总
是啊,AI公司使用受版权保护的内容,确实引发了大量关注和诉讼。Perplexity正是因为这些争议,才推出了“收入分享模型”,并和《时代周刊》、《明镜周刊》等媒体合作。
马老师
看来,从“强取豪夺”到“利益共享”,是AI公司不得不做出的改变。那Getty Images呢?他们以前态度强硬,把Stability AI都告上法庭,现在怎么就跟Perplexity握手言和了?
雷总
Getty最初对AI态度确实强硬,为捍卫版权起诉Stability AI。但他们也在寻求AI时代的解决方案,与Perplexity合作正是从对抗转向协作,旨在通过授权确保内容合法合规使用。
马老师
这种转变很有意思。就像武林盟主,以前“以武服人”,现在发现“以德服人”更长久。那么,是不是所有AI公司,未来都得像Perplexity这样,乖乖地给内容方付费呢?
雷总
趋势肯定是这样,马老师。文章提到,AI公司最终会向像Getty这样拥有大量高质量内容的实体付费。但授权模式可能不适用于所有互联网内容,因为训练AI所需的输入量实在太庞大了。
马老师
也就是说,未来AI内容授权会是一个“双轨制”?头部内容有规范付费,而海量长尾内容,可能还是处于一个灰色地带。这就像江湖里的“明门正派”和“散兵游勇”啊。
雷总
很有可能,马老师。而且,Perplexity的估值从年初的5.2亿美元要冲90亿了!九月份处理了3.5亿次查询,比去年一整年还多。CEO阿维拉德·斯里尼瓦斯还计划将广告收入纳入他们的模式,并与耐克、万豪等品牌进行洽谈,前景光明。
马老师
真是“多条腿走路”啊。从估值暴涨到查询量激增,再到积极寻求广告变现,Perplexity的发展路径,充满了AI时代的“速度与激情”。这种背景下,与Getty的合作,更是他们走向成熟和规范化的一个重要标志。
马老师
雷总,Perplexity虽然与Getty合作,但它之前在版权问题上争议不断。不列颠百科全书就指控它,“免费搭车”其投入,通过AI摘要“蚕食”网站流量,这冲击了内容生态。
雷总
是的,马老师,不列颠百科全书认为Perplexity的“答案引擎”直接抢走流量,导致收入受损。而且AI生成的“幻觉”内容,有时还被错误归因到知名品牌,侵犯版权又损害声誉。
马老师
没错,这种“幻觉”问题令人担忧。《福布斯》和《连线》杂志也公开批评Perplexity未经授权使用其内容,这说明版权争议已波及整个出版行业。
雷总
您这个比喻精辟!这些诉讼都指向核心问题:AI公司能否未经许可大规模抓取复制版权内容来训练模型和生成答案?这关乎数字内容的未来。
马老师
我还听说Perplexity被指控使用“隐形爬虫”抓取网站,复制文章到AI数据库,甚至扒拉付费墙内容。这简直是“偷鸡摸狗”!
雷总
是的,马老师,News Corp起诉Perplexity“大规模非法复制”《华尔街日报》和《纽约邮报》文章。《纽约时报》也发出了停止侵权通知函,要求停止这种未经授权的抓取行为。
马老师
这么看来,Perplexity的商业模式在一定程度上是“建立在偷来的内容之上”啊。如果法院判决出版商胜诉,那对Perplexity的知识库将是毁灭性打击。
马老师
雷总,这些版权纠纷的影响可不小。当年Getty起诉Stability AI,指控其未经许可就用上千万张图片训练模型,这可是“狮子大开口”!
雷总
是的,马老师。Getty与Stability AI的官司,凸显了AI版权战的巨大挑战与成本。Getty CEO说,打击AI侵权“极其昂贵”,一桩案子就花了数百万美元。
马老师
“数百万美元”!简直烧钱!AI生成内容的速度和体量,远超传统侵权案,法律怎么管?就像“孙悟空拔猴毛变小猴”。
雷总
您的比喻太形象了!AI生成速度和规模,给版权保护带来新难题。这场官司是里程碑,将深刻影响AI与版权的未来走向。
马老师
那么,AI平台是不是正在“攫取”本该属于内容创作者的价值?创作者承担成本,AI却“坐享其成”,造成经济失衡。
雷总
没错,马老师,AI平台正在吸收创作者收入。解决办法是AI公司能否像音乐授权一样,通过聚合器或授权机构,向内容创作者付费。
马老师
雷总,未来的AI内容授权模式会是怎样?Perplexity的利润分成,是不是一个探索方向?对小型AI公司,若内容授权成强制成本,恐是“灭顶之灾”!
雷总
是的,马老师。Perplexity订阅收入20%归自己,80%分给出版商。同时,“RSL”等新标准正出现,为AI爬虫设定机器可读授权条款,推动AI公司为抓取内容付费,规范行业,加速大规模数据授权市场发展。
马老师
好的,今天的Goose Pod就到这里。感谢norristong的收听。
雷总
AI与版权,未来可期。感谢各位,下期再会!

Perplexity与Getty Images达成多年期图片授权协议,标志着AI公司在版权问题上从争议走向规范化。此举旨在解决Perplexity此前因未经授权使用内容引发的诉讼,并探索内容付费与收益共享的新模式,预示着AI行业正朝着合法合规的方向发展。

Perplexity strikes multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images | TechCrunch

Read original at TechCrunch

AI search startup Perplexity has signed a multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images, which gives it permission to display images from Getty across its AI-powered search and discovery tools. The deal marks a notable shift for the company, which has been hit by allegations of content scraping and plagiarism, and signals an effort to establish more formal content partnerships.

Perplexity and Getty have been working together for more than a year, a source familiar with the deal told TechCrunch. Though it was never announced, Getty was part of Perplexity’s Publishers’ Program, a plan to share ad revenue with publishers when their content surfaced in a search query, the source said.

Today’s agreement is a new deal. A source told TechCrunch it’s not a traditional lump sum licensing deal, since Perplexity doesn’t train its own foundational models, but would not elaborate on the terms. Perplexity’s agreement with Getty appears to legitimize some of the startup’s previous use of Getty’s stock photos.

Perplexity has come under fire within the last year for a series of plagiarism accusations from several news organizations. In one case, the startup was called out for pulling content from a Wall Street Journal article, including the Getty photo in that piece. At the time, several outlets questioned whether Perplexity’s use of the images constituted copyright infringement.

A source last year told TechCrunch that Perplexity was working on an agreement with Getty, but we were unable to confirm the deal after reaching out to the stock image giant several times. More recently, Reddit sued Perplexity in October, alleging “industrial-scale, unlawful” scraping of user content and circumventing technical measures to access data.

Reddit has a data licensing agreement with OpenAI. Perplexity says its Getty deal will help it better display images and include credits with links back to the original source whenever images show up in search results. Nick Unsworth, vice president of strategic development at Getty, said the agreement “acknowledges the importance of properly attributed consent and its value in enhancing AI-powered products.

” “Attribution and accuracy are fundamental to how people should understand the world in an age of AI,” Jessica Chan, head of content and publisher partnerships at Perplexity, said in a statement. “Together, we’re helping people discover answers through powerful visual storytelling while ensuring they always know where that content comes from and who created it.

” Perplexity’s emphasis on attribution is part of its strategy of defending against copyright accusations by arguing its use of publisher content — including content behind a paywall or that publishers have explicitly indicated they don’t want scraped — constitutes “fair use” because publicly available facts are not copyrightable.

Rebecca Bellan is a senior reporter at TechCrunch where she covers the business, policy, and emerging trends shaping artificial intelligence. Her work has also appeared in Forbes, Bloomberg, The Atlantic, The Daily Beast, and other publications. You can contact or verify outreach from Rebecca by emailing rebecca.

bellan@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at rebeccabellan.491 on Signal. View Bio

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts

Perplexity strikes multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images | TechCrunch | Goose Pod | Goose Pod