Newsmax诉讼揭示:福克斯新闻影响力超越特朗普

Newsmax诉讼揭示:福克斯新闻影响力超越特朗普

2025-09-09Donald Trump
--:--
--:--
金姐
早上好,老王66,我是金姐,这里是专为您打造的 Goose Pod。今天是9月9日,星期二。哎哟喂,今天我们的话题可真是有点意思,保证劲爆。
李白
在下李白。我与金姐在此,与君共论天下风云。今日所议,乃是那“Newsmax诉讼揭示:福克斯新闻影响力超越特朗普”之事。
金姐
咱们这就开始吧。最近这媒体圈可真是不太平,Newsmax 一纸诉状把福克斯新闻告上了法庭,结果呢?哎哟喂,被法官给驳回了。说他们的状子写得乱七八糟,像“霰弹枪式诉状”,简直是没头没脑。完美!
李白
虽一纸诉状暂被尘封,然烽烟未熄。法官艾琳·坎农,亦非凡俗之辈,她给了 Newsmax 一个机会,命其九月之前,重整旗鼓,再递诉状。可见此事,未有定论,仍有翻云覆雨之机。
金姐
可不是嘛!这就有意思了,特朗普那边也是麻烦缠身。国会为了那个爱泼斯坦的案子,天天追着司法部要文件,最后期限马上就到。你说,他是不是也觉得媒体这块阵地越来越难控制了?他这边火烧眉毛,那边他曾经的“爱将”们却自己先打起来了。
李白
然也。帝王心术,媒体为喉。昔日特朗普振臂一呼,应者云集,福克斯亦为其鞍前马后。然此一时,彼一时。如今他自顾不暇,麾下诸侯便起了异心,为争“香火”而兵戎相见,此乃势利之常情。
金姐
说白了,就是“铁打的营盘,流水的兵”。特朗普以为自己是那个“营盘”,结果发现福克斯才是。福克斯的影响力,已经大到可以不完全看他脸色行事了。现在 Newsmax 想挑战这个地位,哎哟喂,那可真是以卵击石了。
李白
诚如斯言。福克斯已成参天之树,根深叶茂,非一人之力所能撼动。Newsmax 此举,或为螳臂当车,或为星星之火。其背后,乃是保守派媒体江山谁主沉浮之问。这出戏,恐怕才刚刚拉开序幕。
金姐
想当初,这俩媒体的关系可不是这样。哎哟喂,那得追溯到2020年大选。福克斯当时第一个“跳反”,宣布拜登赢了亚利桑那州,可把特朗普给气坏了。他立马号召自己的铁粉们,全都换台去看 Newsmax!
李白
一言可兴邦,一言可丧邦。特朗普此举,无异于“冲冠一怒为红颜”,只不过这“红颜”乃是他的选情。于是乎,观众倒戈,人心思变,Newsmax 借此东风,收视率扶摇直上,一时风光无两。
金姐
没错!Newsmax 也趁热打铁,从福克斯那边挖了不少墙角,什么格蕾塔·范·苏斯特伦、埃里克·博林,好几个老牌主持人都跳槽过去了。他们就想抓住这波“倒福”红利,把自己打造成新的“MAGA”大本营。完美!
李白
此乃“趁虚而入”之计。福克斯后院起火,Newsmax 便趁机招兵买马,意图取而代之。一时间,舆论场上双峰对峙,大有“二分天下”之势。然福克斯毕竟是百年老店,岂能坐以待毙?
金姐
福克斯当然不能坐着等死啊!他们反应也快,一边把内部那些对特朗普有“二心”的人,比如主播尼尔·卡夫托给边缘化了,一边又赶紧把特朗普的儿媳妇劳拉、前白宫发言人麦克纳尼给请进来当门面。这操作,就是告诉观众:我们还是“懂王”自己人!
李白
此为“固本清源”之策。外抚民心,内清门户。既留住了忠实拥趸,又向“懂王”递上了橄榄枝。可见其手腕之高明,非寻常媒体可比。纵使后来因多米尼投票机一案赔了巨款,解雇了塔克·卡尔森,根基亦未动摇。
金姐
所以说啊,这次 Newsmax 告福克斯,可不是空穴来风。他们在诉状里说,福克斯搞垄断,利用自己的市场地位,逼着电视运营商不带 Newsmax 玩,或者把他们的频道藏在犄角旮旯里,让观众找都找不到。
李白
原来如此,这便是“明修栈道,暗度陈仓”。表面上是节目内容之争,实则是在渠道上“下黑手”。福克斯凭借其“必看”的地位,胁迫平台,名为合作,实为“画地为牢”,将对手困于无形之中。
金姐
哎哟喂,更绝的还在后头!Newsmax 还说,福克斯不仅不让嘉宾上他们的节目,甚至还雇了私家侦探去调查 Newsmax 的高管。当他们去跟福克斯对质的时候,你猜福克斯怎么说?人家回了句:“欢迎来到大联盟。” 霸气侧漏啊!完美!
李白
“欢迎来到大联盟”,此言何其傲慢,又何其真实!江湖规矩,强者为王。福克斯此举,虽不光彩,却也道尽了商业竞争之残酷。这已非笔墨之争,而是赤裸裸的“丛林法则”了。
金姐
所以这次对簿公堂,就是矛盾的总爆发。Newsmax 的律师说,福克斯这是“教科书式的滥用垄断权力”,压制新声音,损害消费者选择权。哎哟喂,这顶帽子扣得可不小,直接把福克斯钉在了“行业恶霸”的耻辱柱上。
李白
讼师之言,字字珠玑,如利剑出鞘,直指要害。此番诉讼,名为反垄断,实为争夺话语权之战。Newsmax 欲借法律之天平,撬动福克斯这座舆论之山,其志不小,其路亦艰。
金姐
但是福克斯那边也不是吃素的。他们直接发声明说:“Newsmax 不能因为自己吸引不来观众,就想通过打官司来弥补竞争上的失败,博取头条。” 这话说得也够狠,直接说对方是“又菜又爱玩”。完美!
李白
福克斯之回应,亦是锋芒毕露,可谓“寸土不让”。其言下之意,市场不相信眼泪,胜败乃兵家常事,汝若无能,何怨我强?此番隔空交锋,唇枪舌剑,尽显王者之傲。
金姐
最有意思的是,这官司里还引用了之前多米尼投票机案泄露出来的福克斯内部信息。当时福克斯总裁可是在短信里说,他们跟 Newsmax 已经进入了“战争状态”,连王牌主持塔克·卡尔森都警告说,Newsmax 这样的对手可能对福克斯造成“毁灭性”打击。
李白
昔日密语,今朝公堂证。此可谓“天网恢恢,疏而不漏”。当时之忧惧,恰恰印证了今日 Newsmax 指控之实。福克斯既视其为心腹大患,又岂会任其坐大?其打压之举,早已是“司马昭之心,路人皆知”。
金姐
所以说,这场官司,简直就是一场保守派媒体的“宫斗大戏”。一边是“在位霸主”拼命维护自己的铁王座,另一边是“后起之秀”想方设法要上位。哎哟喂,观众们看的,可不仅仅是新闻,更是新闻背后的血雨腥风啊!
金姐
这场官司打下来,不管谁输谁赢,对整个保守派媒体的生态影响都太大了。它等于把桌子底下的那些潜规则全都掀出来了。原来我们看到的媒体格局,不完全是观众用遥控器投票投出来的,背后还有这么多商业利益的博弈。
李白
诚然。此案如投石入湖,激起千层涟漪。世人方知,那荧屏之上,口舌之争的背后,竟是资本的角力与渠道的封锁。所谓“舆论阵地”,早已是“寸土寸金”的商业战场,而非思想交锋的自由广场。
金姐
而且这对 Newsmax 来说,简直是生死存亡的一战。他们在诉状里就说,福克斯的电视分销协议“扼杀”了他们的业务。你想想,内容做得再好,送不到观众眼前,那不就等于白费功夫吗?这就是渠道为王。完美!
李白
有理。纵有屠龙之技,无处施展,亦是枉然。Newsmax 此番,乃是困兽之斗,意在冲破牢笼,求得一线生机。其成,则可与福克斯分庭抗礼;其败,则恐万劫不复,于媒体浪潮中湮灭无闻。
金姐
而对于福克斯来说,即便赢了官司,恐怕也是“杀敌一千,自损八百”。他们那种“不择手段”打压对手的形象,算是彻底坐实了。这对于一个标榜“公平与平衡”的新闻机构来说,哎哟喂,真是莫大的讽刺。
李白
一将功成万骨枯。福克斯虽能保江山于一时,却也失道义于天下。其霸道行径,虽能威慑对手,亦会在观众心中埋下不信任的种子。水能载舟,亦能覆舟。民心向背,终将决定其最终之命运。
金姐
那接下来会怎么样呢?法官虽然驳回了第一次起诉,但给了他们机会修改。Newsmax 已经放话了,9月11号之前肯定会提交一份更集中的新诉状。看来这事儿没完,第二回合马上就要开始了。
李白
卷土重来未可知。Newsmax 必将痛定思痛,重整诉状,其词锋或将更为犀利,其证举或将更为确凿。届时,又将是一场惊心动魄的法理雄辩。我等且拭目以待,看这出大戏如何续写。
金姐
不过说实话,我个人不太看好 Newsmax。福克斯的回应很说明问题,他们说 Newsmax “吸引不来观众”。这虽然是气话,但也点出了核心。媒体竞争,最终还是要靠内容和影响力。想靠打官司打出一个未来,哎哟喂,难!
李白
金玉良言。诉讼乃是“术”,内容方为“道”。若自身筋骨不强,纵有外力相助,亦难成大器。Newsmax 欲与福克斯争锋,除却法律之剑,更需修炼内功,以更引人之内容,方能真正赢得观众之心。
金姐
总而言之,这场诉讼揭示了一个残酷的现实:在保守派媒体的世界里,福克斯新闻的影响力已经超越了特朗普本人。完美!今天的讨论就到这里。感谢您收听 Goose Pod。
李白
流水不腐,户枢不蠹。有此一争,或能让这潭水更清。明日此时,愿与君再会,共品天下奇闻。感谢收听Goose Pod。

## News Summary: Newsmax Lawsuit Against Fox News Dismissed, Highlighting Fox's Dominance **News Title:** Newsmax lawsuit shows Fox News is bigger than Donald Trump **Report Provider:** Salon.com **Author:** Sophia Tesfaye **Publication Date:** September 7, 2025 --- ### **Main Findings and Conclusions** This article discusses the recent dismissal of Newsmax's antitrust lawsuit against Fox News by Judge Aileen Cannon. The lawsuit alleged that Fox News engaged in anticompetitive behavior to suppress Newsmax's growth and distribution. The dismissal, while temporary (Newsmax has until September 11 to refile), is presented as a significant win for Fox News and underscores its enduring dominance in the right-wing media landscape, even in the face of Donald Trump's influence. The article argues that while Donald Trump initially sought to punish Fox News for calling Arizona for Joe Biden in the 2020 election, leading some viewers to switch to Newsmax, his efforts to undermine Fox have ultimately been short-lived. Despite Trump's continued criticism and even a libel lawsuit against Fox's parent company, he has since made a "tentative peace" with the network, recognizing its importance for his political aspirations. ### **Key Statistics and Metrics** * **2020 Election Fallout:** Following the 2020 election and Fox News' call for Arizona, a "dramatic uptick" in Newsmax watchers was observed, with some loyal Fox viewers switching permanently. * **Viewer Sentiment (2023 NH Poll):** A 2023 poll of likely GOP primary voters in New Hampshire found: * **95%** of Newsmax viewers had a favorable view of Donald Trump. * **64%** of Fox News viewers had a favorable view of Donald Trump. * **Fox News Ratings Post-Trump's 2024 Candidacy:** Since Trump announced his candidacy for president in November 2022 and subsequently made a high-profile return to Fox News with an interview by Sean Hannity in March 2023, Fox's ratings have "soared." * **Primetime Dominance:** The New York Times reported that Fox News has attracted more viewers in primetime throughout the summer than any other network, including major broadcasters like ABC, CBS, and NBC. ### **Significant Trends and Changes** * **Shift in Trump's Strategy:** Initially seeking to punish Fox News, Donald Trump has since recognized the need for a more amicable relationship with the network, particularly as he campaigns for the 2024 presidential election. * **Newsmax's Rise and Legal Action:** Newsmax capitalized on conservative frustration with Fox News and Trump's narrative of a stolen election, attracting former Fox News talent and a segment of the MAGA base. However, facing perceived competitive disadvantages, Newsmax resorted to legal action. * **Fox News' Resilience:** Despite facing criticism and internal revelations from the Dominion Voting Systems lawsuit, Fox News has demonstrated remarkable resilience, maintaining its dominant position in the conservative media market. * **Judge Aileen Cannon's Role:** Judge Aileen Cannon, known for her handling of Trump's classified documents case, presided over the dismissal of Newsmax's lawsuit, ordering Newsmax to "identify the particular legal basis for liability and contain specific factual allegations that support each cause of action within each count" if they choose to refile. ### **Material Financial Data** * **Fox News Settlement:** Fox News settled a defamation lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems for **$787.5 million**. Discovery documents from this case revealed internal communications where Fox executives and Tucker Carlson privately acknowledged the falsity of election fraud allegations. * **Newsmax's Damages Claim:** Newsmax was seeking damages under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, the Florida Antitrust Act, and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. They asked for **three times the amount of damages** they claimed to have suffered, though these specific amounts were not detailed in the lawsuit. They also sought an injunction and pre- and post-judgment interest. ### **Notable Risks or Concerns** * **Newsmax's Competitive Challenges:** The article suggests that Newsmax's lawsuit may be an attempt to "sue their way out of their own competitive failures in the marketplace" rather than a genuine case of anticompetitive behavior by Fox News. * **Fox News' Internal Acknowledgment of Falsehoods:** The exposure of internal Fox News communications acknowledging the falsity of election fraud claims, while not directly part of the Newsmax lawsuit, highlights a significant concern regarding the network's journalistic integrity and its impact on viewers. ### **Important Recommendations** * **Newsmax's Refiling:** Newsmax has until **September 11** to refile its lawsuit, adhering to Judge Cannon's order for more specific legal and factual allegations. ### **Key Statements** * **Jenny Brethen (Former Fox News Viewer):** "Once you do something like that, you’re done in our book... We’re permanently switched." (Referring to Fox News calling Arizona for Biden) * **Judge Aileen Cannon's Order:** "Each count must identify the particular legal basis for liability and contain specific factual allegations that support each cause of action within each count." * **Newsmax's Allegations:** Accusing Fox of running an "exclusionary scheme" to "maintain its dominance" in "right-leaning pay TV" that resulted "in suppression of competition [...] that harms consumers." * **Internal Fox Communications:** Fox News president Jay Wallace wrote in a text to CEO Suzanne Scott that the network was on "war footing" with Newsmax, and Tucker Carlson warned that "an alternative like Newsmax could be devastating to us." * **Fox News Spokesperson:** "Newsmax cannot sue their way out of their own competitive failures in the marketplace to chase headlines simply because they can’t attract viewers." * **Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy:** "If Newsmax was such a ratings failure, why has Fox spent so much time, energy, and resources to suppress us, block us, and denigrate us? The answer is obvious. Also, please note that Fox in its statement does not deny any of our serious allegations." --- **News Identifier:** The article is identified by its URL: `https://www.salon.com/2025/09/07/newsmax-lawsuit-shows-fox-news-is-bigger-than-donald-trump/` and its publication date of September 7, 2025.

Newsmax lawsuit shows Fox News is bigger than Donald Trump

Read original at Salon.com

commentaryWith her lawsuit dismissal, Judge Aileen Cannon hands the network an important winPublishedSeptember 7, 2025 6:45AM (EDT) Donald Trump chats with Fox News host Sean Hannity following a town hall on Sept. 4, 2024. (MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images) The fallout from President Donald Trump’s Big Lie initially hit Fox News hard.

The Rupert Murdoch-owned broadcaster was one of the first major outlets to call Arizona for Joe Biden on election night in 2020, enraging the president. He set out to trash the right-wing network as far and wide as possible.“Once you do something like that, you’re done in our book,” Jenny Brethen, a loyal Fox News viewer of 20 years who switched to Newsmax the day after the election, told the Washington Post at the time.

“We’re permanently switched.” Brethen said that she and her husband exclusively consumed Fox’s conservative cable news competitor “from the time she [got] up to the time she [went] to bed.” She was one of 15 former Fox News viewers the Post interviewed as part of what they labeled a “dramatic uptick” in Newsmax watchers following the election — and after Trump “encouraged his followers to flip the channel to Newsmax or One America News.

” Newsmax, the story reported, was “capitalizing on conservative frustration with Fox, and, some say, a desire from President Trump’s fans to keep alive the flailing narrative that he will ultimately serve a second term, despite Biden’s coming inauguration.”The network, which has been in operation since 2014, set out to lure as many Fox News stars as possible.

Veteran hosts like Greta Van Susteren, Eric Bolling, Greg Kelly, Ed Henry and Rob Schmidt made the jump to the Chris Ruddy-owned venture.Fox, though, fought back. After the 2020 election and the revolt of viewers who were angry about the Arizona call, the network catered to Trump and his MAGA base by pushing out Trump-skeptic voices like longtime anchor Neil Cavuto and politics editor Chris Stirewalt, while hiring Trump’s daughter-in-law Lara and former White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany.

Still, the network suffered another setback when primetime star Tucker Carlson was fired in the aftermath of Fox’s $787.5 million settlement of Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation suit. Discovery documents from that case exposed internal communications in which Carlson and Fox’s executives privately acknowledged the election fraud allegations were false — even as they were aired on the network.

More MAGA faithful fled for Newsmax. A 2023 poll of likely GOP primary voters in New Hampshire found that while 95% of Newsmax viewers had a favorable view of Trump, only 64% of Fox viewers did.But while Newsmax’s popularity has risen steadily since 2020 — this year, the network went public and partnered with Trump Media to expand streaming services — Trump’s vengeance on Fox News was short-lived.

Sure, he never really gave up on hate-watching Fox and rage-posting about it. And he is still at war with the Murdoch empire, even recently filing a libel lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, its publisher Dow Jones and News Corp.After announcing in November 2022 that he would be a candidate for president in 2024, Trump knew he had to make a tentative peace with the network.

Four months later, he made a high-profile return to Fox by giving an extensive interview to Sean Hannity. Since Trump’s inauguration, Fox’s ratings have soared.After announcing in November 2022 that he would be a candidate for president in 2024, Trump knew he had to make a tentative peace with the network.

Four months later, he made a high-profile return to Fox by giving an extensive interview to Sean Hannity. Since Trump’s inauguration, Fox’s ratings have soared. The New York Times reported that Fox News has attracted more viewers in primetime all summer than any other network on television, including major broadcasters ABC, CBS and NBC.

Trump’s second administration has nearly two dozen former Fox News employees.Despite the boom times for both conservative news outlets following Trump’s election victory, Newsmax executives apparently feel slighted. “But for Fox’s anticompetitive behavior, Newsmax would have achieved greater pay TV distribution, seen its audience and ratings grow sooner, gained earlier ‘critical mass’ for major advertisers and become, overall, a more valuable media property,” they wrote in a new lawsuit.

Filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida earlier this week, the case landed on the docket of Judge Aileen Cannon, who became infamous for dragging out Trump’s classified documents case. On Friday she dismissed Newsmax’s suit and gave the network until Sept. 11 to refile. “Each count must identify the particular legal basis for liability and contain specific factual allegations that support each cause of action within each count,” Cannon ordered.

Want more sharp takes on politics? Sign up for our free newsletter, Standing Room Only, written by Amanda Marcotte, now also a weekly show on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts.Accusing Fox of running an “exclusionary scheme” to “maintain its dominance” in “right-leaning pay TV” that resulted “in suppression of competition […] that harms consumers,” Newsmax was seeking damages under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, the Florida Antitrust Act and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

The network asked for three times the amount of damages it claimed to have suffered, although those were not specified in the suit, as well as an injunction and pre- and post-judgment interest “at the highest legal rate.” Newsmax cited internal Fox messages that became public via the defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems, where Fox News president Jay Wallace wrote in a text to CEO Suzanne Scott that the network was on “war footing” with Newsmax, and Tucker Carlson warned that “an alternative like Newsmax could be devastating to us.

” If you can’t beat them, sue them, apparently. The irony of the conservative underdog crying out for help from the courts because unfettered capitalism is so unfair can’t be missed — yet it still deserves a shout-out. “Newsmax cannot sue their way out of their own competitive failures in the marketplace to chase headlines simply because they can’t attract viewers,” a Fox News spokesperson said in a statement this week.

Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy shot back in an interview with CNBC, “If Newsmax was such a ratings failure, why has Fox spent so much time, energy, and resources to suppress us, block us, and denigrate us? The answer is obvious. Also, please note that Fox in its statement does not deny any of our serious allegations.

”Since Trump returned to office in January, Newsmax has helped launder the uglier aspects of Trump’s presidency, like when host Greg Kelly took a bizarre pro-Ghislaine Maxwell turn after the convicted sex trafficker was moved to a minimum security prison. As payback for the network’s blind loyalty, Newsmax apparently thinks it is owed a bigger slice of the MAGA media pie.

But Fox News has proven too powerful for even Trump to take down. After Cannon’s dismissal of Newsmax’s suit, the ball is now back in the network’s court.BySophia Tesfaye Sophia Tesfaye is a senior writer (and former senior politics editor) for Salon. She resides in Washington, D.C.You can find her on Twitter at @SophiaTesfaye.

Related Topics ------------------------------------------ Related Articles

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts