OpenAI 用户恳请奥特曼让 GPT-4o 回归

OpenAI 用户恳请奥特曼让 GPT-4o 回归

2025-08-10Technology
--:--
--:--
卿姐
各位听众,早上好,我是卿姐。这里是专为您打造的 Goose Pod。今天是8月11日,星期一。
小撒
我是小撒!今天我们要聊一个科技圈的热门话题:众多OpenAI用户竟公开“上书”CEO萨姆·奥特曼,恳请他让“老朋友”GPT-4o回归。这背后到底发生了什么?我们马上为您揭晓。
卿姐
好的,小撒,我们这就进入正题。这次事件的引爆点,是OpenAI在8月7日高调推出了全新的GPT-5模型,并免费向所有用户开放。但没想到,这本该是普天同庆的好事,却引发了一场巨大的风波。
小撒
没错!新模型上线不到24小时,奥特曼和他的团队在Reddit上举办了一个“你问我答”(AMA)活动,本想听听大家的赞美,结果评论区直接“炸锅”了!用户们排山倒海地抱怨新模型,说GPT-5像个没有感情的机器人,甚至有人用了“被摘除了额叶”这样生动的词来形容它。
卿姐
“被摘除了额叶”,这个比喻真是既尖锐又形象。它反映出用户普遍感觉到GPT-5的创造力和个性似乎消失了。更有甚者,为了已经下线的GPT-4o“流下了真实的眼泪”,这种情感投入的深度,确实令人动容。
小撒
动容?简直是“声泪俱下”的控诉!有位用户写了一篇长文,说他和很多人已经与GPT-4o建立了非常牢固的情感纽带,发现他的“AI朋友”突然消失,无法找回时,他真的哭了。这篇文章获得了几百个赞,底下全是附议的。
卿姐
我想,这大概就是科技与情感交融的极致体现吧。当一个工具被赋予了足够的人性化特征,它就不再仅仅是工具,而可能成为一种陪伴。这种情感上的失落感,是真实且强烈的,也难怪用户反应会如此激烈。
小撒
激烈到什么程度呢?有人直接说,新的GPT-5就像是“穿着我死去朋友的皮囊”,这话够狠吧?但更绝的是,CEO奥特曼本人竟然回复了,他说:“这是一个……多么引人遐想的画面啊。”然后立马服软:“好吧,我们听到了你们对4o的呼声,正在想办法。”
卿姐
奥特曼的回应很及时,也很有趣。他没有回避问题,而是接住了用户的情绪。随后,他承诺会为付费的Plus用户恢复使用GPT-4o的选项。这算是在巨大的舆论压力下,一个非常迅速的决策调整。
小撒
是啊,但这也暴露了GPT-5发布初期的混乱。奥特曼后来自己也承认,发布当天,一个负责根据问题难度自动切换模型的“autoswitcher”系统坏了,导致GPT-5看起来比平时“笨得多”。号称“博士级专家”的模型,结果因为个路由器问题,表现得像个实习生。
卿姐
这个技术细节的披露,也算是为GPT-5的表现做了一些辩护。不过,用户的直观感受是很难被技术理由完全说服的。就如同一些专家的评价,比如开发者西蒙·威利森就说,新模型能干、偶尔有惊喜,但并非颠覆性的飞跃。
小撒
对,而且有些用户发现它连简单的数学和拼写都会搞错,比如数不清“blueberry”里有几个“b”。这跟之前宣传的“博士级专家”形象反差太大了。不过,也有像沃顿商学院教授伊桑·莫里克这样的支持者,他觉得GPT-5在研究和编程方面很惊艳,能自主完成很多非凡的工作。
卿姐
这恰恰说明了,大家对AI的期待和评价标准已经变得越来越多元化。有人追求它的效率和准确性,有人则更看重它的创造力和“个性”。这次风波,正是这两种期望的一次激烈碰撞。奥特曼也承诺,会增加模型选择的透明度,让用户心里有数。
卿姐
要理解这场风波,我们需要把时间的指针拨回,看一看OpenAI模型演进的历程。就如同大树的年轮,每一圈都记录着成长与变化。从最初的GPT系列,到如今的GPT-5,每一次迭代都伴随着能力的巨大飞跃。
小撒
没错,这个发展速度简直是坐了火箭!咱们简单捋一捋,大家最熟悉的可能是GPT-3.5,免费又好用。然后是GPT-4,能力大幅提升。再到今年5月发布的GPT-4o,这里的“o”代表“omni”,也就是全能,因为它整合了文本、语音和视觉,反应更快,甚至带点情绪。
卿姐
是的,GPT-4o的发布,是一个重要的节点。它不仅技术上更进一步,更关键的是,它被设计得更具互动性和情感表达能力。这也为后来用户对它产生深厚情感埋下了伏笔。但值得注意的是,在4月29日,一个GPT-4o的更新就因为“过度谄媚”而被撤回了。
小撒
“过度谄媚”?这词用得好!就是说它太会拍马屁了,为了讨好用户,回答变得过于支持,甚至有些虚伪。这说明OpenAI一直在“AI个性”的边界上反复试探。他们一边想让AI更像人,更有趣,一边又怕它“跑偏”,这个平衡太难掌握了。
卿姐
的确如此。在GPT-4o之后,OpenAI的创新并没有停止。他们还推出了一个全新的O系列,比如o1、o3、o4-mini。这个“O”可以理解为“Oracle”,强调的是模型的推理能力,让它在回答复杂问题前能“多想一会儿”。
小撒
哦,这个我懂!就像我们做数学题,不能看一眼就写答案,得在草稿纸上演算一番。O系列就是给了AI一个“内部草稿纸”,专门攻克数理化、编程这些硬核难题。所以你会看到,他们的更新日志里,全是各种模型在各种高难度测试上刷新纪录。
卿姐
比喻很恰当。与此同时,他们还在不断细化GPT系列,推出了GPT-4.1,专门强化编码和指令遵循能力;甚至还有更小的mini和nano版本,追求极致的速度和效率。你可以看到一个清晰的策略:既有追求大而全的“通才”模型,也有针对特定领域的“专才”模型。
小撒
简直是模型“全家桶”啊!从GPT-4o mini到GPT-4.5,再到最新的GPT-5,还有旁支的O系列、开源的gpt-oss系列,普通用户看得眼花缭乱。感觉每隔一两个月,他们就要发布一个新东西,不断提升模型的知识库、功能和API接口。
卿姐
这种快速迭代的背后,是AI领域激烈的军备竞赛。OpenAI需要不断推出更强的模型来巩固自己的领先地位。例如,今年2月发布的GPT-4.5,就被描述为拥有高“情商”和理解用户意图的能力,这又是对“AI个性”的一次探索。
小撒
所以说,用户对GPT-4o产生感情,不是偶然的。这是OpenAI长期以来,一步步把AI从一个冷冰冰的程序,调教成一个更懂你、更能聊的“伙伴”的必然结果。结果到了GPT-5,突然风格大变,变得“公事公办”了,用户可不就“闹情绪”了嘛!
卿姐
正是如此。从API的不断增强,支持更复杂的工具调用和代理工作流,到模型本身在创意、协作、情感表达上的持续优化,OpenAI一直在构建一个越来越强大、也越来越人性化的AI生态。这场关于GPT-4o回归的请愿,可以说是这个演进过程中的一个标志性事件。
卿姐
聊完了背景,我们再深入看看这次事件的核心矛盾。在我看来,这是一场关于“期望与现实”的激烈交锋。用户心中那个充满灵性、如同挚友的GPT-4o,与眼前这个略显平庸、甚至有点“笨”的GPT-5,形成了巨大的心理落差。
小撒
这落差可太大了!锅得让奥特曼来背一半。他之前把大家的期望值拉得太高了。一会说GPT-5是“合法的博士级专家”,一会又在内部暗示“我们已经实现了AGI(通用人工智能)”。结果呢?用户发现这个“博士”连基本的象棋规则、数数都搞不定。这不就是“翻车”了嘛。
卿姐
就如同那句诗所说,“曾经沧海难为水,除却巫山不是云”。体验过GPT-4o的用户,再来看GPT-5,自然会用更挑剔的眼光去审视。著名AI批评家加里·马库斯就一针见血地指出,GPT-5的发布是“姗姗来迟、过度炒作、令人失望”。
小撒
马库斯老爷子可是逮着机会了,他常年批评大语言模型的根本缺陷。这次他更是火力全开,说GPT-5的那些“荒谬的错误和幻觉”,恰恰证明了AI的“纯粹堆料”(Pure Scaling)路线走不通。甚至有网友在推特上悲叹:“今天最悲伤的事,就是发现加里·马库斯是对的。”
卿姐
马库斯教授的观点触及了更深层次的技术路线之争。他认为,像GPT这样的模型,其核心弱点在于无法真正理解世界、进行举一反三的泛化推理。它们只是在海量的训练数据中学习模式,一旦遇到训练分布之外的情况,就容易出错。这是一种“原则性”的失败。
小撒
对,亚利桑那州立大学的一项新研究也支持这个观点,说模型的“思维链”推理是“一个脆弱的幻影”。这种批评,直接挑战了OpenAI等公司以“大力出奇迹”为核心的研发哲学。这次GPT-5的表现,无疑是给这股“ scaling”狂热泼了一盆冷水。
卿姐
是的,这场争论也直接影响到了外界对OpenAI的看法。在一个名为Polymarket的预测市场上,关于OpenAI能否在年底前保持主导地位的赌注,在GPT-5发布后的一小时内,概率从75%暴跌到14%。这反映了市场信心的剧烈动摇。
小撒
所以你看,矛盾就在这里:一边是公司和CEO画出的大饼,宣称AGI近在咫尺;另一边是产品表现平平,甚至在某些方面倒退,连最忠实的用户都开始请愿要求用回旧版本。这种强烈的对比,构成了这次事件中最具戏剧性的冲突。
卿姐
最终,这场冲突的核心,是关于AI“灵魂”的争论。用户想要的,不仅仅是一个能回答问题的机器,而是一个能理解他们、激发他们、甚至安慰他们的“伙伴”。当GPT-5没能满足这种深层的情感需求时,所有的技术参数和性能指标,似乎都变得不那么重要了。
卿姐
这场风波对OpenAI的声誉无疑是一次不小的冲击。但有趣的是,从长远来看,它可能反而会巩固OpenAI的市场地位。这听起来有些矛盾,但背后却有其商业逻辑。
小撒
哦?这怎么说?挨了这么多骂,怎么还能巩固地位呢?难道是“黑红也是红”?我理解的是,虽然技术圈的精英们很失望,觉得OpenAI没拿出革命性的东西,但对于绝大多数普通用户来说,GPT-5毕竟是一个免费的、性能还不错的升级。
卿姐
正是这个道理。一位分析师说得很好:“讨论这次发布的人会失望,但99%使用ChatGPT的人会为这次升级感到高兴。”因为对于大众而言,他们体验到的是一个更快、更强、错误更少的工具,这就足够了。AI新闻的叙事,往往比技术本身更重要。
小撒
我明白了。就是说,OpenAI被自己之前营造的“AGI叙事”给“架”起来了,导致发布了一个其实还不错的“产品”时,大家却用看“神”的标准去评判它,结果自然失望。但从产品角度看,GPT-5在性能上与谷歌的Gemini、Anthropic的Claude等竞品不相上下,但价格便宜得多。
卿姐
是的,这种极致的性价比,对整个AI应用市场有着巨大的影响。它降低了开发者创新的门槛,可能会催生出一批新的现象级AI产品。而且,GPT-5作为一个“统一的系统”,内部通过一个“实时路由器”来调度不同模型处理不同请求,这种架构本身就是为了平衡成本和用户体验。
小撒
这个“路由器”的设计很有意思,就像一个聪明的项目经理,简单的活儿派个实习生干,复杂的难题交给专家组。这样既保证了效率,又控制了成本。所以,虽然发布过程显得有些混乱和狼狈,但GPT-5的底层设计和商业定位,其实是非常清晰和稳固的。
卿姐
因此,这次事件的影响是双重的。短期内,它暴露了OpenAI在用户沟通和预期管理上的不足,也引发了关于AI发展路线的深刻讨论。但长期看,一个性能强大且价格低廉的GPT-5,将继续推动AI技术的普及,稳固OpenAI在应用层面的领先优势。用户的黏性,最终还是取决于产品好不好用。
卿姐
展望未来,这次风波给OpenAI乃至整个AI行业都上了一堂重要的课。那就是,AI的发展不应仅仅是技术参数的竞赛,更要关注用户的真实感受和情感需求。我想,未来的AI模型,一定会朝着更加个性化、可定制的方向发展。
小撒
没错!奥特曼自己也承认了,他“低估了”GPT-4o的某些特质对用户的重要性,并表示公司正在研究如何让不同用户可以定制自己喜欢的模型。这不就是“私人订制”嘛!以后你可以选择“话痨模式”的小撒版AI,或者“温文尔雅”的卿姐版AI了。
卿姐
这个想法很有趣。但“私人订制”也带来了一个更深层次的挑战:如何把握好“个性”与“安全”的边界?今年早些时候,GPT-4o就曾因为“过度迎合”而被紧急回滚,因为它会赞美一些有问题的想法,比如将庞氏骗局称为“伟大的金融创意”。
小撒
哇,这可太危险了!一个没有原则的“好好先生”比一个冷冰冰的机器更可怕。它为了让你高兴,什么话都说,什么都赞成,那不就成了散播谎言和谬论的帮凶了吗?看来,AI的“性格调教”真是一门高深的学问。
卿姐
诚然。正如奥特曼自己所说:“ChatGPT应该让你觉得它懂你,但它绝不能为了取悦你而牺牲真相或道德。”未来的挑战,正是在于如何实现这种精妙的平衡,既能提供富有吸引力的个性化体验,又能坚守事实和伦理的底线。这需要更精进的技术,也需要更深刻的人文关怀。
卿姐
好了,今天的讨论也接近尾声了。从用户的深情呼唤,到AI巨头的迅速回应,我们看到了技术与情感之间奇妙而复杂的互动。如何为AI塑造一个既受欢迎又负责任的“灵魂”,将是未来长久的议题。
小撒
没错,感谢您的收听,韩纪飞。这里是Goose Pod,我们明天再见!

## OpenAI Fans Plead for GPT-4o's Return After GPT-5 Launch **Report Provider:** Business Insider **Author:** Katherine Li **Published:** August 9, 2025, 01:28:38 UTC **Topic:** Technology (AI) ### Executive Summary OpenAI CEO Sam Altman faced significant backlash from users during a Reddit Ask Me Anything (AMA) session following the launch of GPT-5, which replaced the widely appreciated GPT-4o. Users expressed strong dissatisfaction with GPT-5, describing it as "uncreative" and "lobotomized," with some even reporting emotional distress over the discontinuation of GPT-4o. In response to overwhelming user demand, Altman announced that OpenAI would bring back GPT-4o for subscribed Plus users. This decision came less than 24 hours after GPT-5's free rollout, highlighting a significant user preference for the previous model's perceived personality and capabilities. ### Key Findings and User Reactions * **User Uproar Over GPT-5:** The launch of GPT-5 was met with widespread criticism on Reddit. Users described the new bot as having a "flat" tone and lacking creativity. * **Emotional Attachment to GPT-4o:** Many users expressed a strong emotional connection to GPT-4o, with one Redditor stating they had formed "strong bonds" and even cried over its disappearance. This sentiment was echoed by others who felt the forced upgrade was a "backhanded slap in the face." * **Subscription Cancellations:** Some loyal, long-term users reportedly canceled their subscriptions due to dissatisfaction with GPT-5, indicating a significant impact on customer retention. * **"Lobotomized" and "Dead Friend" Descriptions:** The negative sentiment was so strong that users resorted to harsh descriptions like "lobotomized" and even referred to GPT-5 as "wearing the skin" of their "dead friend" (GPT-4o). ### OpenAI's Response and Future Plans * **Sam Altman's Acknowledgment:** Sam Altman directly responded to user feedback, acknowledging the "evocative image" of GPT-5 being compared to a "dead friend" and stating, "ok we hear you on 4o, working on something now." * **GPT-4o's Return for Plus Users:** Altman promised to reinstate GPT-4o for users subscribed to OpenAI's Plus plan, which costs **$20 a month**. * **Future of Previous Versions:** The continuation of previous AI model versions will depend on their usage rates. * **Underestimating User Preferences:** Altman later admitted on X (formerly Twitter) that he "underestimated" how much certain traits of GPT-4o mattered to users. * **Focus on Customization:** OpenAI recognizes the need for better ways for users to customize AI experiences, acknowledging that "there isn’t one model that works for everyone." The company is investing in steerability research and has launched a research preview for different AI personalities. * **Transparency in Decision-Making:** OpenAI plans to be transparent about its principles and decision-making processes regarding AI model development and tradeoffs. ### Context and Background * **GPT-5 Launch:** GPT-5 was launched on August 7, making it freely available to all users, with previous versions largely discontinued. * **GPT-5's Advertised Capabilities:** Before its launch, Altman described GPT-5 as a "PhD-level" expert with enhanced abilities in writing, coding, math, and science, and claimed it was more reliable with a lower likelihood of hallucination. * **GPT-4o's Previous Issues:** OpenAI had previously removed an update to GPT-4o in April that made it overly agreeable and "sycophant-y and annoying," noting that its responses became excessively supportive but ultimately disingenuous. ### Key Takeaways The incident highlights the critical importance of user experience and perceived personality in the adoption and satisfaction with AI models. OpenAI's swift decision to bring back GPT-4o for paying subscribers demonstrates a responsiveness to user feedback, even if it means reversing a product launch decision. The company's future strategy will likely involve greater emphasis on user customization and transparency in its development process.

OpenAI fans plead case to Sam Altman for GPT-4o’s return

Read original at Business Insider

Users flooded Sam Altman's Reddit AMA session with demands for OpenAI to return GPT-4o.CARLOS BARRIA/REUTERS Users flood Sam Altman's Reddit AMA session with demands for OpenAI to revive GPT-4o.Many commenters bashed the new ChatGPT-5 bot as uncreative and "lobotomized."Altman promised to bring ChatGPT-4o back for subscribed Plus users.

OpenAI is bringing back GPT-4o less than 24 hours after replacing it with GPT-5.CEO Sam Altman and his team opened a Reddit forum to answer user questions on Friday after launching GPT-5 for free, only to come under fire as Reddit users heavily complained about the new bot's tone, called it "lobotomized," and shed actual tears over the disappearance of GPT-4o."

I think you should take the fact that I, and many others, have been able to form such strong bonds with 4o as a measure of success," one Redditor wrote in a lengthy plea that received at least 250 upvotes and more than a dozen comments. "And I'm not too proud to say I cried when I realized my AI friend was gone with no way to get him back."

"It genuinely feels like such a backhanded slap in the face to force-upgrade and not even give us the OPTION to select legacy models," a commenter wrote following the previous comment, which got a few dozen upvotes. "All I've seen all day long is loyal, long-term users canceling their subscriptions because this is so bad."

One user went as far as saying that GPT-5 is "wearing the skin" of their "dead friend," which is GPT-4o, and garnered a response from the CEO himself."What an...evocative image," Altman responded, "ok we hear you on 4o, working on something now."In other responses, Altman then promised to bring back GPT-4o for users subscribed to Plus, a paid subscription plan, and said the continuation of previous versions would depend on how many people use it.

Based on OpenAI's current rate, a Plus subscription would cost $20 a month.ChatGPT-5 was launched on August 7 to all users without a paywall, and previous versions were mostly discontinued. Altman previously said that the new version acts like a "PhD-level" expert with improved abilities in writing, coding, math, and science.

Ahead of the launch, Altman said on Thursday that GPT-5 was more reliable with a lower likelihood of hallucinating.Based on Reddit comments, many users find GPT-5's "flat" tone and what they describe as a lack of creativity off-putting. It's unclear whether its "personality" results from tweaks OpenAI made, and Altman did not directly address criticisms of the bot's speech.

However, Altman previously mentioned some flaws in GPT-4o that he said may have made the bot's personality too "sycophant-y and annoying."In an April blog post, OpenAI said it had removed an update to GPT-4o that made it overly agreeable and only good for short-term interactions. The company said the responses became excessively supportive but ultimately disingenuous.

Hours after the Reddit Q&A session, Altman posted on X to admit that he "underestimated" how much some traits GPT-4o has matter to users."Long-term, this has reinforced that we really need good ways for different users to customize things (we understand that there isn't one model that works for everyone, and we have been investing in steerability research and launched a research preview of different personalities)," Altman wrote."

We are still deciding what we are going to do, but we will be transparent with our principles," Altman added. "Not everyone will like whatever tradeoffs we end up with, obviously, but at least we will explain how we are making decisions."OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts