“哎呀”:顶级投行深入审视经济,发现“劳动力市场看起来不那么乐观” | 财富

“哎呀”:顶级投行深入审视经济,发现“劳动力市场看起来不那么乐观” | 财富

2025-11-12Business
--:--
--:--
雷总
早上好 hanjf12,我是雷总,这里是专为您打造的 Goose Pod。今天是11月13日,星期四。
董小姐
我是董小姐。今天我们要聊一个让华尔街顶级投行都惊呼“哎呀”的话题:美国劳动力市场的真实情况,可能远比我们看到的要严峻。
雷总
没错,瑞士银行,也就是瑞银,最近发布了一份报告,标题就用了“Yikes”这个词,直言不讳地指出美国劳动力市场,这个长期以来经济的稳定器,可能正面临“真正的麻烦”。他们认为,这种疲软已经超出了常规的就业数据。
董小姐
“真正的麻烦”?这个词可不轻。通常这些大行说话都滴水不漏,用词这么直白,说明情况不一般。核心问题是什么?是裁员增加了,还是招聘减少了?这可是影响我们企业经营和消费者信心的根本。
雷总
两者都有。瑞银用了一个很形象的比喻,说劳动力市场就像一个浴缸。现在的问题是,“出水口”,也就是裁员和离职,水流很稳定甚至在加大;而“进水口”,也就是招聘,水流却越开越小。这么一来,浴缸里的水位,也就是总就业人数,肯定会下降。
董小姐
这个比喻很直观。数据上呢?有没有具体的数字支撑?我做企业最看重的就是实打实的数据,而不是模糊的感觉。消费者不花钱,企业就得收缩,裁员是必然结果。
雷总
数据非常惊人。根据行业标准机构Challenger, Gray & Christmas的统计,仅仅10月份,企业就宣布了15.7万人的裁员,是自2020年7月以来的最高单月记录。今年到目前为止,裁员总数已经达到了惊人的76万,比2009年金融危机后的任何一年都多。
董小姐
76万!这可不是个小数目。而且我们之前聊过美国政府停摆的问题,那次停摆导致大量经济数据无法发布,美联储前理事都说这像是“蒙着眼睛开飞机”。现在数据一出来,果然问题不小。这让人联想到全球经济面临的资产泡沫和债务危机,一环扣一环,风险在不断累积。
雷总
确实如此。要理解现在的困境,我们得回顾一下历史。大家还记得2008年那场金融危机吗?那次危机导致失业率飙升,经济陷入了长时间的衰退。从数据上看,失业率从2008年初的5%左右,一路攀升到2009年底的10%,翻了一倍。
董小姐
我当然记得。那段时间,我们家电行业也受到了巨大冲击。消费者捂紧了钱包,整个市场的需求急剧萎缩。企业为了生存,不得不削减成本,裁员、降薪是家常便饭。那是一段非常艰难的日子,整个复苏过程非常缓慢,用了将近十年的时间,失业率才回到危机前的水平。
雷总
是的,那次衰退有一个很重要的后遗症,经济学家称之为“迟滞效应”。简单来说,就是经济的创伤会留下长期的“疤痕”。很多人失业时间太长,技能跟不上了,就再也回不到劳动力市场。这导致经济的潜在增长能力都受到了损害,就像一部好机器,闲置太久,有些零件就生锈了。
董小姐
这个“疤痕”我深有体会。危机过后,很多企业在招人时变得非常谨慎。我们宁愿让现有员工加班,也不愿意轻易扩大招聘。因为一旦经济再次波动,裁员的成本和对企业声誉的影响都很大。这种心态持续了很长时间。
雷总
没错。而疫情后的情况又有所不同,出现了一个新现象,叫做“大辞职潮”(The Great Resignation)。疫情让很多人重新思考工作和生活的关系,大量员工主动辞职,导致企业招工困难。为了留住人,很多公司都不敢轻易裁员,这就形成了所谓的“低招聘、低解雇”市场。
董小姐
“低招聘、低解雇”,这听起来像是一种脆弱的平衡。企业不是不想招人,是招不到合适的人;不是不想裁员,是不敢裁。但这种平衡不可能永远持续下去。一旦市场风向转变,或者企业扛不住成本压力,裁员的闸门一旦打开,可能就会一发不可收拾。
雷总
董小姐一语中的。这正是现在市场冲突的焦点。过去一年,包括美联储主席鲍威尔在内的许多经济学家,都在用“低招聘、低解雇”来形容市场。大家普遍认为,企业因为害怕“大辞职潮”重演,所以紧紧抓住手里的员工不放。
董小姐
这不就是我们常说的“劳动力囤积”吗?就像我们企业会储备一些核心零部件一样,企业把员工也当成了一种稀缺资源来囤积。但这有个前提,就是企业对未来有信心,愿意承担这部分成本。如果信心没了呢?
雷总
问题就在这里。瑞银和花旗等机构的经济学家现在站出来说,这个前提可能已经不存在了。“低解雇”的神话正在被打破。花旗集团的经济学家维罗妮卡·克拉克就说,现在市场上有很多可用的工人,企业可能觉得没有必要再为留住员工而付出额外成本了。
董小姐
说白了,就是供需关系变了。以前是人少活多,现在是活少人多。你看,亚马逊裁了14000个公司职位,UPS一年内削减了48000个工作岗位,这些可都是行业巨头,他们的动作就是市场的风向标。这说明企业已经从“留人”模式切换到了“收缩”模式。
雷总
是的,而且美联储现在也陷入了两难。一方面,通胀数据依然有点高,他们不敢轻易降息来刺激经济;但另一方面,劳动力市场恶化的速度可能非常快,一位美联储理事就承认,她担心劳动力市场会“迅速恶化”,这让他们在决策时束手束脚。
董小姐
这就是典型的“既要……又要……”。既要控制通胀,又要保住就业,世界上哪有这么多两全其美的事情?做企业最忌讳的就是犹豫不决。我认为,核心问题还是要看清主要矛盾。如果就业市场真的崩了,需求没了,通胀自然也就下来了,但那代价就太大了。
雷总
这个影响是立竿见影的。首先冲击的就是家庭和消费信心。密歇根大学的消费者信心指数在11月已经跌到了50.3,几乎接近2022年创下的历史最低点。越来越少的家庭认为工作好找,而预期未来失业率会上升的比例,飙升到了上世纪80年代经济衰退以来的最高水平。
董小姐
消费者的感受是最真实的。当人们开始担心自己的饭碗,第一反应就是减少开支,尤其是像家电、汽车这样的大件消费。这对我们实体经济的打击是致命的。没有订单,工厂就得停工,裁员就会进一步增加,形成一个恶性循环。
雷总
完全正确。而且这次的冲击在行业上也很集中。科技和仓储行业是重灾区,这和自动化、人工智能的发展也有关系。我们之前聊过的AI泡沫,现在看来,它在创造新岗位的同时,也在加速替代一些传统岗位。这种结构性的失业,解决起来更加困难。
董小姐
是的,企业的信誉也面临考验。过去十年,很多公司都尽量避免在第四季度裁员,因为这会影响节日气氛和公司形象。但今年10月份的裁员数据如此之高,说明很多公司已经顾不上那么多了。这种信心的丧失,比数据本身更可怕,它会通过供应链传导到每一个角落。
雷总
展望未来,情况确实不容乐观。瑞银的结论是,如果裁员继续,招聘持续放缓,劳动力市场将走向“更明显的收缩”。穆迪的经济学家甚至认为,美国正处于衰退的“边缘”,未来12个月内发生衰退的概率高达50%。
董小姐
越是这个时候,企业越要保持清醒。不能盲目扩张,要守住自己的核心技术和现金流。对个人来说,可能也需要重新评估自己的职业规划,提升自己的核心竞争力,为可能到来的“冬天”做好准备。
雷总
是的,美联储的政策走向将是关键。市场普遍预期他们会在2025年降息,但这把“双刃剑”能否用好,时机和力度都非常关键。太早了,通胀可能重燃;太晚了,经济可能已经“硬着陆”了。这非常考验决策者的智慧。
雷总
总而言之,看似平静的湖面下,可能已是暗流涌动。今天的讨论就到这里。感谢您收听 Goose Pod。
董小姐
我们明天再见。

顶级投行瑞银指出,美国劳动力市场正面临“真正的麻烦”。裁员创下新高,招聘放缓,如同浴缸“出水口”加大而“进水口”变小。消费者信心骤降,科技等行业受创。美联储面临两难,经济衰退风险加剧,企业和个人需为“冬天”做好准备。

‘Yikes’: Top investment bank looks under the hood of the economy and finds ‘the labor market doesn’t look that good’ | Fortune

Read original at Fortune

A leading investment bank has delivered an arresting diagnosis of the U.S. economy: the labor market, long a pillar of resilience, may be in real trouble. In their latest economic outlook, UBS economists led by Jonathan Pingle painted a picture of mounting weakness that extends well beyond headline job numbers, warning of a growing risk to households and the broader recovery.

The latest “US Economics Weekly” note from the Swiss investment bank came with bated breath ahead of the impending end of the federal government shutdown. Economists and market-watchers have been deprived of federal economic data for over 40 days, something that former Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner Erica Groshen likened to “flying blind” in late October.

If the government does reopen, Pingle’s team said it expects jobs data for September to be released next week, and potentially the October inflation report, the Consumer Price Index. Economists need that data now more than ever. For much of the year, top economists, including Fed Chair Jerome Powell, have said we’re in a “low hire, low fire” jobs market.

For much of the year, employers were laconic in hiring, and seemed afraid to fire their workers; perhaps still wounded from the pandemic-era “Great Resignation.” UBS isn’t alone on Wall Street in worrying that, maybe the “low-fire” part of the equation isn’t quite true anymore. Now, “there are plenty of available workers that, on the whole, businesses probably don’t feel the need to hold on to workers for longer than necessary,” Veronica Clark, a Citigroup Inc.

economist, told Bloomberg. Meanwhile, Dan North, senior economist at Allianz Trade Americas, also told Bloomberg that “you’ve got a substantial number of well-established companies making pretty big head cuts.”People are getting laid off and not hired again Firing is running higher than advertised, UBS argued, citing the fact that “unemployment insurance claims, layoff announcements and WARN notices have all been running ahead of the pre-pandemic pace.

Even the lagged Business Employment Dynamics data, the gold standard of data on job creation and job destruction dynamics has been showing the pace of job loss at or above the pre-pandemic pace through the latest data.” Indeed, cuts have accelerated sharply. October saw 157,000 layoffs announced by corporations, per industry standard Challenger, Gray & Christmas, the highest monthly total since July 2020.

Technology and warehousing were hit especially hard, with cuts also linked to automation and artificial intelligence.​ The year-to-date tally? A startling 760,000 seasonally adjusted cuts through October, far outpacing the same period in 2024 and running higher than any year since 2009 — the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis.

Major companies are taking action: Amazon cut 14,000 corporate roles, UPS has slashed 48,000 jobs over the past year, and Target eliminated nearly 2,000 staff in a single sweep.​ ‘Bathtub’ risk and weak hiring Workers are getting thrown into a growing pool of others not finding jobs. UBS likens the job market to a bathtub: with outflows (layoffs) steady and inflows (hiring) slowing, the water level (total jobs) is bound to fall.

The hiring rate, as measured by multiple business surveys, has dropped to levels historically seen only in recessions. Excluding healthcare and social assistance, which have been relatively steady, private-sector payrolls have been declining by an average of 36,000 jobs per month. Since the start of the year, household employment as measured by the main government survey has been falling by about 72,000 jobs per month through August.

Such a pace is “well below” the rate required to keep up with population growth, let alone maintain a stable unemployment rate, which has now crept up to a post-2021 high. Labor force participation has slipped, and more than 800,000 people have left the labor force but say they still want a job.​Economists note the broadest measure of underemployment, known as U-6, has jumped by 0.

6 percentage points since January to 8.1%. That’s now 1.3 percentage points higher than at the end of 2019. Notably, the rise isn’t just about people out of work: more Americans are working part-time for economic reasons, another classic sign of slackening demand. “That is exactly the opposite of what should happen under a negative labor supply shock stemming from immigration,” UBS wrote, referring to the Trump administration’s argument that immigration restrictions would tighten the labor market.

Job openings continue to decline: as of the end of October, Indeed.com reported that postings had sunk to their lowest level since 2021, with almost every sector seeing year-over-year drops. Meanwhile, the weekly average of initial unemployment claims is running above 2023’s level and continuing claims are nearing a post-pandemic high.

​ And even the openings that appear active, Pingle argued, may not be tied to real hiring efforts. The hiring rate “consistent with recession” has been a gap “so large that seemingly many of the openings probably are not seeing much effort to be filled,” according to Pingle. “We can also look at the 14 million people not working but who want a job or are searching for one, or the 2 million collecting unemployment benefits.

Given that abundance, it would seem that at least some of the openings do not appear anxious to be filled.” Holiday hiring and sentiment plunge Not only are workers losing jobs, but the market for new opportunities is shrinking as well. Seasonal hiring plans for the holidays are running well below pre-pandemic norms.

Challenger, Gray & Christmas reports a combined September/October total of just 400,000 announced holiday roles — sharply lower than the 625,000 average for the 2014–19 period and even below recent years. Key retailers like Target aren’t even disclosing numbers, and the National Retail Federation suggests seasonal jobs could be down 40% from a year ago.

​This chill is hitting consumer and business sentiment. The University of Michigan’s consumer confidence reading dropped to 50.3 in November, barely above the all-time low set in 2022. Fewer households report jobs are plentiful, and the share expecting unemployment to rise over the next year has soared to levels not seen since the recession-scarred 1980s.

Among small businesses, optimism is “struggling to gain traction” amid inflation fears and continued labor market turmoil.​ The Fed weighs its options Federal Reserve officials are increasingly divided, with some policymakers warning that the risk to jobs now rivals concerns about inflation. While some see an argument for interest rate cuts to buffer the labor market, others worry inflation isn’t yet tamed.

One Fed governor admitted she worries because “the labor market can deteriorate very quickly,” calling for caution and flexibility as each new set of economic data is released.​ The investment bank’s conclusion? If layoffs keep pace and hiring continues to slow, the labor market is headed for “more obvious contraction.

” And that, they warn, could soon filter down to undermine household confidence, consumer spending — and the entire recovery. “If a bathtub is draining faster and faster while the faucet isn’t changed, eventually the water level is going to start to drop. That is a material risk to the outlook.”

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts