他获OpenAI offer,发文12小时,Meta就想把他“反挖”回去

他获OpenAI offer,发文12小时,Meta就想把他“反挖”回去

2025-08-07Technology
--:--
--:--
卿姐
早上好,韩纪飞,我是卿姐。欢迎收听专为您打造的 Goose Pod。今天是8月8日,星期五。
小撒
我是小撒!今天我们要聊一个特别有意思的话题:他刚拿到OpenAI的offer,才发文嘚瑟了12个小时,老东家Meta就火急火燎地想把他“反挖”回去!
小撒
咱们这就开聊!这事儿的主角叫杨顺泰(Yangshun Tay),一位新加坡的AI工程师。他在网上刚一宣布“我拿到OpenAI的offer啦”,你猜怎么着?12小时之内,Meta的邮件就到了,写着“恭喜啊!要不要考虑回来跟我们干?”这速度,比我点外卖还快!
卿姐
这可真是“天下谁人不识君”呐。更有趣的是,杨顺泰一开始还以为Meta没认出他这个前员工。结果一回复,对方说:“我们知道您,一清二楚。” 看来Meta的人才雷达是24小时开机,而且是高精度扫描。
小撒
没错!这就像你刚跟新欢官宣,前任立马打来电话说“我知道你过得好,但要不要再考虑一下我?”。杨顺泰自己都觉得好笑。他离开Meta已经两年多了,自己开了家叫GreatFrontEnd的公司,做得也还不错,没想到老东家还这么惦记着。
卿姐
但这份“惦记”背后,其实是硅谷愈演愈烈的人才争夺战。杨顺泰本人也直言,他认为Meta在AI竞赛中已经落后了,而且作为一名员工,机会成本太高。当AI浪潮风起云涌时,为别人打工,可能就错过了创造下一个伟大产品的机会。
小撒
说到机会成本,这可不是小事!尤其是在AI领域,今天的一个想法,明天可能就是一家独角兽公司。杨顺泰的选择,其实代表了很多顶尖工程师的心声。不过,真正把这场“战争”推向白热化的,还是Meta这些巨头们挥舞的支票。
卿姐
没错,这已经不是简单的“挖人”,而是近乎疯狂的“抢人”。据报道,Meta为了从OpenAI等竞争对手那里挖走顶尖AI研究员,开出的薪酬包简直是天文数字。有的高达九位数,甚至有传言说,有人拿到了上亿美元的签约奖金。
小撒
上亿美元!这哪是年薪,这简直是公司收购价啊!微软的研究主管不是说了嘛,去年一个顶级的深度学习专家,身价跟一个顶级的NFL四分卫新秀差不多。我算是明白了,现在硅谷最贵的资产,不是代码,不是服务器,而是能创造AI的大脑!
卿姐
正是“千军易得,一将难求”。Meta的CEO扎克伯格甚至亲自下场招人,把自己比作一个寻求顶尖天才的“NFL总经理”,还列出了一份想要挖角的AI明星名单。比如,他们就成功地把ChatGPT的共同创建者之一赵胜佳(Shengjia Zhao)从OpenAI挖了过来。
小撒
这已经不是挖墙脚了,这是直接想把对手的承重墙给拆了啊!不过杨顺泰这件事也提醒了我们,顶尖人才的流动性非常高。就像他说的,即使Meta取得了突破,这些知识和技术也很难被长时间地锁在公司内部。大家都在建自己的模型,你追我赶。
卿姐
从某种意义上说,这种竞争对全人类和AI的进步反而是件好事。它加速了技术的迭代和创新。杨顺泰最终也选择不去OpenAI,而是继续做自己的事业。他把这件事公之于众,更多是为了提升自己的知名度,为未来的项目铺路。这本身就是一种非常聪明的策略。
卿姐
要理解这场人才战争为何如此激烈,就必须先了解“战场”上的一位关键角色——OpenAI。它就像是AI江湖中的一方“名门正派”,初创时的使命就充满了理想主义色彩。就如同那句诗所说,“安得广厦千万间,大庇天下寒士俱欢颜”,它的初心是“确保通用人工智能(AGI)能造福全人类”。
小撒
没错!2015年刚成立的时候,OpenAI是个非营利组织,由马斯克、山姆·奥特曼这些大佬牵头,说白了就是“为爱发电”,搞研究、发论文、开源代码,一副“技术无国界,成果共分享”的姿态。他们早期的研究,比如那个能自己学会玩魔方的机械手,简直酷毙了!
卿姐
是的,那种开放和协作的精神吸引了许多顶尖人才。但在2017年左右,团队逐渐意识到,要实现AGI这个宏伟目标,需要投入的资源是惊人的,每年可能需要数十亿美元。非营利模式就像一叶扁舟,难以承载如此巨大的远航。于是,一个重大的转折点到来了。
小撒
转折点就是——搞钱!2019年,OpenAI摇身一变,成立了一个叫做OpenAI LP的“有限盈利”公司。这个结构很巧妙,意思是我要去赚钱了,但我的盈利是有上限的,赚来的钱最终还是要服务于最初的“造福人类”的使命。这既能吸引投资,又能保住“名门正派”的面子。
卿姐
这个决定立刻就收到了成效。2019年7月,微软就带着10亿美元的投资加入了,成为了OpenAI的“独家云服务提供商”。这笔投资如同甘霖,让OpenAI能够开发出像GPT-3这样拥有1750亿参数的庞然大物。之后,微软在2023年又追加了据称高达100亿美元的投资,双方的合作关系也愈发紧密。
小撒
有了钱,有了算力,OpenAI就像打通了任督二脉,一路开挂!GPT-3、DALL-E 2、ChatGPT、GPT-4……一个个王炸产品接连问世,彻底点燃了全球的AI热潮。当然,中间也经历了马斯克退出董事会、山姆·奥特曼被短暂罢免又回归的“宫斗”大戏,但这并没有阻止它成为AI领域的领头羊。
卿姐
随着OpenAI的成功,整个AI行业的人才市场也进入了一个新纪元。我们看到,2025年的AI人才战场已经不能用“激烈”来形容,而是“白热化”。AI已经从一个实验性技术,转变为企业的核心基础设施。大家都在不惜血本地招兵买马。
小撒
没错!我们来看看几大巨头的“军备竞赛”数据:NVIDIA,作为AI芯片的“军火商”,自己就有901个AI相关的职位。OpenAI,75%的岗位都和AI研发有关。微软更是重量级,承诺要投800亿美元建AI基础设施和数据中心!这哪是招人,这分明是在组建“AI复仇者联盟”啊!
卿姐
在这种背景下,顶尖人才的薪酬自然水涨船高。据路透社报道,OpenAI的顶尖研究员年薪超过1000万美元是常态。而Meta为了挖人,给出的薪酬更是惊人,顶级AI研究工程师的基本工资就能达到44万美元,这还不包括巨额的股票和奖金。
小撒
谷歌也不甘示弱,据说给DeepMind的顶级研究员开出了每年2000万美元的薪酬包,还把股票的归属期从4年缩短到3年。这简直是在说:“别等了,钱现在就给你,赶紧来!”这已经不是按年薪算了,这是按“忠诚度”的有效期来发钱了。
卿姐
这场人才争夺战也催生了新的趋势。比如,它正在全球范围内展开,Meta的“超级智能”实验室据说完全由移民研究员组成。同时,我们看到,除了传统的软件工程师、数据科学家,一些非技术性的AI岗位,如AI内容创作者、AI教练、AI合规经理等也开始涌现。
小撒
最有趣的一点是,现在最受追捧的技能竟然不是技术!数据显示,“设计”已经超过技术专长,成为AI相关职位中最急需的技能,紧随其后的是沟通、协作和领导力。看来,光会写代码还不行,你还得会讲故事,能把AI的魔力翻译成人类能懂的语言。
小撒
聊到这儿,气氛有点太热烈了,咱们得泼盆冷水冷静一下。这场AI狂欢的背后,其实隐藏着巨大的冲突和挑战。Anthropic公司的CEO达里奥·阿莫迪就发出了一个惊人的警告:AI可能会在1-5年内,“消灭一半的入门级白领工作”,导致失业率飙升到10-20%!
卿姐
这确实是一个令人忧虑的预测。我想,这大概就是技术变革带来的必然阵痛。过去的自动化浪潮,替代的更多是体力劳动。但这一次,AI瞄准的是我们引以为傲的“认知任务”——编程、金融分析、法律文书审阅、甚至是创意写作。这些曾经是通往中产阶级的阶梯,如今却可能最先被AI取代。
小撒
没错,扎克伯格自己都预测,到2025年,AI就能胜任“中级工程师”的工作。这意味着什么?很多公司CEO现在都在盘算一个问题:什么时候我的AI能达到人类的效率水平?一旦达到,我就可以用机器代替人力了。这可不是危言耸听,微软、沃尔玛已经开始裁员,同时大力投资AI了。
卿姐
这种潜在的“白领大屠杀”,对刚步入职场的年轻人来说,无疑是巨大的冲击。传统的“职业阶梯”似乎正在被打破。一个年轻人,如果连入门级的岗位都找不到了,他又该如何积累经验,向上攀登呢?这引出了一个深刻的矛盾:技术的进步,是否会以牺牲一代人的职业前途为代价?
小撒
还有一个更有意思的矛盾,不在别处,就在公司内部。一份报告显示,现在阻碍AI大规模应用的最大瓶颈,不是员工,而是领导层!员工们其实已经准备好了,甚至渴望学习AI技能,但领导们的决策速度和组织变革的速度跟不上。这就像是“士兵们都想冲锋了,将军还在帐篷里研究地图”。
卿姐
是的,数据显示,只有1%的公司认为他们的AI部署已经成熟,而92%的公司计划在未来三年增加AI投资。这说明大家都在砸钱,但大多数都还没想好怎么真正把它融入到工作流程中去。员工们对AI取代自己工作的担忧,比领导们想象的要高出三倍。这种认知上的错位,正是组织内部的一大冲突。
小撒
所以,现在最需要的,是一种叫做“战略性人力规划”(SWP)的东西。这名字听起来很高大上,其实说白了,就是别再“头痛医头,脚痛医脚”地被动应对了。你得像管理财务资本一样,用分析和预测来管理你的人才。提前三到五年,就想好你需要什么样的人,具备什么样的技能。
卿姐
说得对,这正是“运筹帷幄之中,决胜千里之外”的智慧。那些在人才管理上表现出色的公司,每位员工创造的收入,比中位数公司高出整整300%。通过战略性人力规划,企业可以主动地为员工提供再培训和技能提升的机会,而不是等到岗位被淘汰后,才匆忙地把他们推向市场。
卿姐
这场由AI掀起的波澜,其影响已经远远超出了科技行业本身,正深刻地塑造着我们的经济和社会。最直接的冲击,体现在就业市场上。一方面,我们看到AI相关职位的需求在爆炸式增长,仅在美国,2024年第四季度的AI职位发布量就比两年前激增了68%。
小撒
但另一方面,就像硬币的另一面,自动化也在加速。有研究预测,到2030年,美国经济中高达30%的工作时间可能会被自动化。这意味着,将有大约1200万个岗位需要进行转变。像办公室文员、客服、收银员这些重复性高的工作,需求会大幅下降。
卿姐
这种结构性的转变,对劳动者提出了前所未有的要求。据预测,当前一半的劳动力都需要接受再培训,才能适应AI增强型的工作角色。这不仅仅是学习一项新软件那么简单,而是需要重塑我们的技能组合,尤其是那些AI难以替代的社交情感能力和高级认知能力。
小撒
没错!而且这种转变的压力,更多地落在了低收入群体的肩上。数据显示,低薪工作的从业者需要转换职业的可能性,是高薪从业者的10到14倍。这就带来了一个严峻的社会问题:如果应对不当,AI可能会进一步加剧社会的不平等。
卿姐
面对这种冲击,企业自身的组织形态也在发生变化。为了真正从AI中创造价值,许多公司开始重新设计工作流程,设立像“AI治理”这样的高级职位。他们不再仅仅是把AI当作一个工具,而是围绕AI重构整个业务。一个有趣的现象是,越是大型的企业,这种变革的速度越快。
小撒
这倒是可以理解,大公司有更多的资源去试错和投入。但即使如此,大部分公司仍然表示,还没有从AI中看到对企业利润的实质性影响。这说明,从“使用AI”到“用AI赚钱”,中间还有很长一段路要走。不过,大家对未来的预期还是很乐观的。
卿姐
展望未来,我们看到的并非一个由AI主宰、人类无事可做的黯淡景象。恰恰相反,一个更加人机协作的时代正在到来。就如同那句预测所说,“我们看到生成式AI正在增强专业人士的工作方式,而不是直接淘汰大量工作岗位。”未来的工作,将是人类智慧与机器智能的共舞。
小撒
没错!未来的工作场景可能会是这样:设计师用AI生成无数创意草稿,然后凭自己的审美和经验挑选出最佳方案;律师让AI在几秒钟内审阅完数千页的卷宗,自己则专注于构建案件的核心逻辑。AI成了我们最强大的助手,把我们从重复性劳动中解放出来,去从事更具创造性的工作。
卿姐
为了迎接这样的未来,个人和组织都需要做出改变。个人需要终身学习,不断更新自己的技能。而企业,则需要采取更广阔的招聘思路,更加注重技能和能力,而不是一纸文凭。同时,为员工提供与时俱进的培训,将是企业保持竞争力的关键。
小撒
最有意思的是,AI甚至在改变“招聘”这个行业本身。未来的招聘官,自己首先得是个AI专家。但同时,市场对他们“人性化”技能的需求却在飙升,比如建立人际关系的能力。你看,机器越智能,我们反而越需要那些真正能体现“人”的价值的能力。这可真是个有趣的循环!
卿姐
从一位工程师的跳槽风波,到整个AI时代的浪潮,我们看到了技术、资本与人才之间错综复杂的博弈。这不仅仅是一个行业的故事,更是我们每个人未来都将身处其中的现实。今天的讨论就到这里了。感谢您收听Goose Pod。
小撒
没错,跟上这波浪潮,别被拍在沙滩上!明天见!

## AI Talent Wars Intensify: Meta Reaches Out to Engineer After OpenAI Offer This news report from **Business Insider**, authored by **Charles Rollet**, details the fierce competition for Artificial Intelligence (AI) talent in Silicon Valley, highlighted by a personal anecdote from AI engineer **Yangshun Tay**. The events described likely occurred around **August 5, 2025**, the publication date of the article. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **Intense Competition for AI Talent:** The AI talent market is described as "hotter than ever," with major tech companies like Meta actively pursuing leading AI researchers and engineers. * **Meta's Aggressive Recruitment:** Meta demonstrated its aggressive recruitment strategy by reaching out to Yangshun Tay within 12 hours of him posting about an OpenAI job offer. This outreach included acknowledging his prior five-year tenure at Meta. * **Tay's Perspective on Meta and AI Leadership:** Tay, who previously worked at Meta for over five years and now runs his own startup, GreatFrontEnd, expressed skepticism about Meta's current leadership in the AI race. He is "not too bullish on Meta" despite their high-profile hires. * **Opportunity Cost of Employment:** Tay emphasizes the significant "opportunity cost" for top AI talent to be employees, especially given the rapid pace of AI development. He believes that by working for others, engineers miss opportunities to build potentially groundbreaking products themselves. * **Value of Top Talent:** The article underscores that AI breakthroughs often come from a small number of highly skilled individuals, explaining why companies like Meta are willing to offer substantial compensation packages, reportedly reaching "into the nine figures." * **Talent Mobility:** Tay notes that talent frequently moves between tech companies in the Bay Area, suggesting that any breakthroughs achieved by one company may not remain exclusive for long due to the ongoing "model arms race." * **AI's Impact on Workforces:** The report touches upon the broader trend of AI changing how teams work, with CEOs claiming AI can replace certain roles. Tay suggests that AI excels at repetitive tasks, freeing up human workers for creativity and innovation, where top talent plays a crucial role. * **Marketing and Profile Raising:** Tay's decision to post about his OpenAI offer was partly for marketing purposes, aiming to "raise his profile and for future projects." ### Key Statistics and Metrics: * **Timeframe of Meta's Response:** Meta reached out to Yangshun Tay "within the next 12 hours" of him posting about his OpenAI offer. * **Tay's Tenure at Meta:** Tay previously worked at Meta for "over five years." * **GreatFrontEnd Team Size:** Tay's startup, GreatFrontEnd, currently has "around 10 people." * **Compensation Packages:** Meta is reportedly offering compensation packages that "reach into the nine figures" for AI talent. ### Notable Trends and Changes: * **Escalating Talent War:** The demand for AI engineers has created an intensely competitive hiring environment, surpassing previous years' conditions. * **Shift in Focus for Top Talent:** Top AI engineers are increasingly considering the opportunity cost of employment and are drawn to building their own ventures in the current AI boom. * **AI as a Disruptor:** AI is changing the nature of work, automating well-practiced tasks and highlighting the importance of human creativity and innovation. ### Notable Risks or Concerns: * **Sustainability of High Demand:** Tay expresses concern about the sustainability of the current high demand and stress levels for AI engineers. * **Job Security for Less Skilled Workers:** The report suggests that individuals without specialized AI skills are at higher risk of being replaced by AI. ### Material Financial Data: * **Nine-Figure Compensation:** The article mentions that Meta is offering compensation packages that can reach "into the nine figures" for AI talent, indicating extremely high salaries and potential bonuses or equity. ### Key Statements Verbatim: * On Meta's outreach: "Within the next 12 hours, Meta sent me an email congratulating me on my OpenAI offer and asking if I'd be interested in working with them." * On Meta's AI leadership: "I'm just not too bullish on Meta after working there for over five years." * On opportunity cost: "The opportunity cost of being an employee is quite high because AI is moving so fast. By being an employee and building ideas for somebody else, you're losing out on the opportunity to build a product that could eventually become very big." * On the value of top talent: "AI advancement really relies on breakthroughs that come from just a few people. You don't need too many — just a few smart, cream-of-the-crop people to have major breakthroughs and extremely disproportionate impact." * On posting for marketing: "Posting about the offer was more for marketing purposes. My plan was to say I have some offers, but I'm not taking them. It's just to raise my profile and for future projects."

He got an OpenAI offer. Within 12 hours of posting it, Meta tried to win him back.

Read original at Business Insider

OpenAI offered me a job. Meta reached out just hours after I posted about it. AI engineer Yangshun Tay.Yangshun Tay AI engineer Yangshun Tay posted about an OpenAI offer and got a near-instant email from Meta.He says Meta is behind on AI — and there's an opportunity cost to being an employee, too.It's just one example of how Silicon Valley's talent wars are hotter than ever.

Meta is making headlines for poaching leading AI researchers and offering some compensation packages that reach into the nine figures. Hiring AI-focused software engineers is becoming intensely competitive across Big Tech and AI startups.This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Yangshun Tay, a 35-year-old AI engineer currently based in Singapore.

Tay previously worked for five years at Meta and now runs GreatFrontEnd, a startup that helps software developers improve their skills.This interview has been edited for length and clarity. Meta and OpenAI didn't respond to requests for comment.I interviewed with OpenAI a while ago, but I only decided to post about their offer on Tuesday.

Within the next 12 hours, Meta sent me an email congratulating me on my OpenAI offer and asking if I'd be interested in working with them.What was amusing to me was that I initially thought they didn't know I had previously worked at Meta. But when I replied to their email, they actually noted that they knew about my background there.

They knew exactly who I was.I worked at Meta for over five years before leaving to build my own company, GreatFrontEnd, which is a platform for front-end engineers to upskill themselves. We have around 10 people now, though we're not looking to scale it extremely big. We're keeping it running while we explore new ideas and products.

Meta isn't leading the AI raceI was very surprised that Meta reached out so quickly because I don't actually have a background in AI research. I'm more on the applied engineering side. Even for the OpenAI role, it's for software engineering — building ChatGPT and working with those teams. So I was surprised Meta was also hiring for AI engineering positions.

But I'm probably not going back to Meta. I don't think they're leading the AI race right now, even though they've made a lot of high-profile hires. I'm just not too bullish on Meta after working there for over five years.The Meta outreach wasn't really an offer anyway. Since I've been gone for more than two years, I'd have to re-interview if I wanted to join back.

The opportunity cost of being an employee is highBeing in demand as an AI engineer is great, but it's also a little stressful, and I'm not sure if it's sustainable. To be honest— I'd prefer to build my own things right now - maybe start new AI products or ventures.The opportunity cost of being an employee is quite high because AI is moving so fast.

By being an employee and building ideas for somebody else, you're losing out on the opportunity to build a product that could eventually become very big.I think it's great for top talent, but there are a lot of engineers struggling to find jobs, as well. Based on my experience, AI advancement really relies on breakthroughs that come from just a few people.

You don't need too many — just a few smart, cream-of-the-crop people to have major breakthroughs and extremely disproportionate impact. That's why Meta is willing to pay so much for top talent.But talent moves around so frequently in the Bay Area between tech companies. Even if Meta has a breakthrough, it's not going to stay within Meta's walls for long.

Every big company is building their own AI models now. There's a model arms race going on right now. You see companies beating each other every other day in terms of benchmarks.I think it's overall good for humanity and AI advancement — so Meta is actually doing everyone a favor.AI is changing how teams workMany CEOs are claiming they're replacing their workforce with AI, and those without special skills are definitely more at risk.

AI is great at doing stuff that's well-practiced and has been done many times. A lot of work in software engineering falls into this category — there's already a solution, you just need someone to implement it.AI handles that well, which leaves people to focus on what matters more: creativity and innovation.

That's where top talent comes in — they're the ones innovating.The hiring environment now is nowhere close to what I experienced during my previous years at Meta. The salaries were great back then, but nowhere near what Meta is paying for AI talent now.I posted to raise my profileAfter I posted about my OpenAI offer, it wasn't just Meta that reached out.

Several other companies, mostly smaller companies I hadn't heard of, sent cold emails.Posting about the offer was more for marketing purposes. My plan was to say I have some offers, but I'm not taking them. It's just to raise my profile and for future projects.I was seriously considering joining OpenAI, but ultimately I think the timing is too good to pass up.

Right now is a great time to build and start a company. as told to Meta OpenAIMore Silicon Valley Read next

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts

他获OpenAI offer,发文12小时,Meta就想把他“反挖”回去 | Goose Pod | Goose Pod