ANALYSIS | The U.S. economy is thriving in spite of tariffs. Will it last? | CBC News

ANALYSIS | The U.S. economy is thriving in spite of tariffs. Will it last? | CBC News

2025-08-01Business
--:--
--:--
Aura Windfall
Good morning norristong_x, I'm Aura Windfall, and this is Goose Pod for you. Today is Friday, August 1st. What I know for sure is that today, we're diving deep into a topic that touches我们的钱包和我们的未来。
Mask
I'm Mask. We're here to dissect the analysis on the thriving U.S. economy. Everyone predicted disaster from tariffs, yet here we are. The question isn't just if it will last, but who has the will to make it last.
Aura Windfall
Let's get started. It truly is a fascinating phenomenon. Economists predicted doom and gloom from the trade war, but the U.S. economy seems to be telling a different story. Stocks are at all-time highs, and employment is strong. It makes you seek the truth behind the numbers.
Mask
It's not telling a different story, it's telling the real story. The U.S. GDP jumped at a 3% annualized rate in the second quarter of 2025. That’s a massive acceleration from the contraction we saw in the first quarter. Strength doesn't just happen, you create it.
Aura Windfall
And at the heart of that strength appears to be the consumer. People are spending, which accounts for so much of the economic activity. There's a spirit of resilience there. But is this resilience felt by everyone? I wonder about the hidden costs behind that growth.
Mask
Of course there are costs. Look at Ford. They posted a $36 million net loss, blaming $800 million in import tariffs. They're now projecting a $2 billion hit for the year. This is the friction of change. Weak players get filtered out. It’s necessary for evolution.
Aura Windfall
That's a powerful point. One company's pain versus the nation's gain. It's a difficult truth to reconcile. General Motors is another example, their profits dropped by 35% because of tariffs, yet they haven't raised prices. They are absorbing a $1.1 billion loss. What does that say about their purpose?
Mask
It says they're afraid. One expert said companies might just eat the costs rather than "draw the ire of President Trump." They’re playing defense. But the market is forward-looking. GM's stock bounced back. Investors see the long game. They bet on strength, not fear.
Aura Windfall
It feels like we're walking a tightrope. On one side, we have this incredible economic defiance, and on the other, we have major industries like the auto sector bleeding money. How long can that dynamic last before something gives? It’s a question of balance and integrity.
Mask
The imbalance is the point. It creates pressure. The question is whether the impact has just been delayed. Businesses stockpiled products when the tariffs were announced. That front-running might be why we haven't seen the full impact. The real test is yet to come, but I don't think it'll be the catastrophe everyone predicted.
Aura Windfall
And it’s not just the U.S. showing this surprising strength. Canada’s economy has also fared better than expected. Unemployment is down, and consumer spending is picking up. There’s a shared spirit of perseverance, a testament to the people’s will to move forward, to find a way.
Mask
Resilience is a key variable. But let's be clear, Canada's situation is different. Exemptions for CUSMA-compliant products have dragged their average effective tariff rate down to almost nothing. It’s not magic; it’s strategic negotiation. They found a loophole in the storm I created.
Aura Windfall
So, what I'm hearing is a story of two economies. One, the broad, national picture, which looks incredibly robust. And the other, a sector-specific view, where the pain is very real and acute. The question we must hold in our hearts is, which story will define our future?
Aura Windfall
To truly understand this moment, we have to look back. This isn't the first time tariffs have shaped the destinies of nations. There's a deep history here, a story of connection and conflict between the U.S. and its neighbors. It’s about finding our way through these cycles.
Mask
History is a data set of what works and what doesn't. Economic historian Douglas Irwin defined three eras of U.S. tariff policy. First, the 'Revenue Period' until 1860, where tariffs funded the government. They were a tool for building, not just for fighting.
Aura Windfall
Then came the 'Restriction Period,' from the Civil War until 1933. Tariffs soared to 50%, with the goal of protecting domestic industries. It was a time of looking inward. You can feel the intention shift from building revenue to building walls. What did that do to our collective spirit?
Mask
It made the nation an industrial power. Protectionism works if you have a clear objective. The Republican Party favored it, supporting industry and workers. Of course, it was opposed by those who wanted cheaper goods, but you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. Then came Smoot-Hawley.
Aura Windfall
Ah, the Smoot-Hawley Act of 1930. A name that lives in infamy for many. It raised tariffs so high that it sparked international retaliation and is often blamed for worsening the Great Depression. It's a powerful lesson in unintended consequences and the importance of global harmony.
Mask
It was a lesson in poor execution, not failed strategy. It led to the third era, 'Reciprocity,' from 1934 on. The U.S. pivoted to promoting free trade, and average tariffs plummeted. This led to agreements like GATT, the WTO, and eventually, NAFTA. A total reversal.
Aura Windfall
And NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, truly transformed the relationship between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. It created the world's largest free-trade bloc. The vision was one of seamless commerce, of partnership. Trade between the partners soared to over a trillion dollars.
Mask
NAFTA was "the worst trade deal ever made." It hollowed out manufacturing. That's why it had to be dismantled and replaced. The USMCA, or CUSMA in Canada, introduced stricter rules of origin for autos, better labor protections, and new digital trade guardrails. It’s a superior agreement, designed for a new era of competition.
Aura Windfall
The relationship with Canada has always had these moments of tension and togetherness. Back in 1911, Canada rejected a free trade deal, fearing U.S. economic domination. There’s always been this dance between the desire for economic integration and the deep need to protect national identity. It’s a beautiful, complex dynamic.
Mask
Then you have the 1965 Auto Pact, which integrated the auto market and saved the Canadian industry. Or the 'Nixon Shock' in 1971, when Nixon imposed a 10% tariff and threatened the pact. Every action has a reaction. You push, they push back. That’s how you find the equilibrium.
Aura Windfall
In 2018, when the Trump administration imposed steel and aluminum tariffs, Canada responded in kind. It’s like a conversation, albeit a very tense one. These tariffs were eventually lifted to pave the way for the USMCA, showing that even in conflict, there is a path toward resolution and gratitude.
Mask
And now, in 2025, new tariffs have been imposed over issues like fentanyl and immigration. A baseline 10% on all countries, with higher rates for some. Canada was exempt from the baseline but still faces 25% on non-USMCA-compliant goods. This isn't random; it's a precise application of leverage.
Aura Windfall
It's so much to take in. From tariffs for revenue, to tariffs for protection, to free trade, and now back to a more targeted, aggressive use of tariffs. What I know for sure is that understanding this history is essential to navigating the uncertainty of today. It gives us the context for the choices we make now.
Mask
Exactly. This isn't a new playbook. It's an old one, updated for the 21st century. The goal is to re-shore manufacturing and assert economic dominance. It’s about disrupting the status quo to build something stronger. History provides the blueprint. You just have to be bold enough to use it.
Aura Windfall
And that brings us to the heart of the conflict. There's a fierce debate among economists and leaders about whether this bold strategy is truly effective. Is it a visionary move to reshape the future, or as one post-Keynesian analysis put it, a "wrong doing" based on a misunderstanding of global finance?
Mask
It's effective if you understand the goal isn't just about trade balances. It's about power. J.P. Morgan's research shows tariffs can squeeze exporter margins and fall on importers. It creates pressure points. The "uncertainty shock" that critics complain about is a feature, not a bug. It forces change.
Aura Windfall
But at what cost? That uncertainty weighs on business confidence, on spending, on hiring. It creates fear. Bruce Kasman at J.P. Morgan warned that rising trade conflict concerns can have a significant independent negative impact on growth. It’s not just numbers; it’s about the human spirit in business.
Mask
Discomfort is a prerequisite for growth. The argument that tariffs are "blunt, outdated tools" is nonsense. They are direct, powerful instruments. The idea that the U.S. *must* run a trade deficit because of its reserve currency status—the Triffin Dilemma—is an excuse for inaction. It's a self-imposed limitation. We can break it.
Aura Windfall
But the evidence suggests these tools aren't working as intended. The Harvard Business Review noted they fail to stimulate innovation or sustainable productivity. Instead, they risk stagflation by raising costs for businesses and straining household budgets. Where is the "aha moment" for the everyday person struggling with higher prices?
Mask
The "aha moment" comes later, when factories are being built here, not overseas. The pain is front-loaded. Yes, J.P. Morgan's chief U.S. economist, Michael Feroli, noted that if fully passed through, the new rates could add 0.4 percentage points to inflation. That's a calculated risk. A necessary cost of re-industrialization.
Aura Windfall
And what about the Federal Reserve in all this? They seem to be caught in the middle, adopting a "wait-and-see" approach. Fed Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged the tariffs would cause larger-than-expected inflation and a slowdown, but they seem hesitant to act decisively. Their independence is being questioned.
Mask
The Fed's caution is precisely why this strategy is working. Michael Feroli thinks it bolsters the case for a very cautious approach to rate cuts. The administration is steering economic policy, not an unelected board. The conflict between the White House and the Fed is a necessary power struggle to redefine who is in control of the nation's destiny.
Aura Windfall
But that struggle creates incredible volatility. One day there's a 35% tariff proposed for Canada, the next a reprieve. It makes it impossible for businesses to plan, to invest, to create with confidence. It feels less like a strategy and more like, as some have said, a state of "paralysis."
Mask
Paralysis for the old way of doing things. It's creative destruction. The goal, as J.P. Morgan's economists believe, is to settle the average effective tariff rate around 15-18%. The path is uncertain, but the destination is clear. You can't build a new world without tearing down parts of the old one.
Aura Windfall
Let’s talk about the real-world impact of this conflict, because it’s not just theoretical. These decisions are creating ripples across the globe, affecting nations, industries, and people in very concrete ways. What I know for sure is that every policy has a human face.
Mask
The impact is the leverage. Look at the deals. The U.S. and EU agreed to a 15% tariff on most goods, but with key exceptions. Steel and aluminum remain at 50%. The U.S.-Japan deal set a 15% tariff on autos. This is surgical. It’s not a blanket attack; it's a series of calculated moves.
Aura Windfall
And those moves have consequences. For Japan, analysts see it as a positive, potentially boosting corporate earnings and their GDP. But for American consumers and businesses, it's a different story. Nora Szentivanyi at J.P. Morgan called one tariff package a "$400bn tax hike on U.S. households and businesses." That's staggering.
Mask
It's a transfer of wealth. And a wake-up call. The U.S.-Vietnam deal raises their effective tariff rate to 20%. This forces companies to rethink their supply chains. The goal isn't to punish Vietnam, but to force a realignment of global manufacturing. It's about disrupting dependencies, especially on China.
Aura Windfall
But the impact on China is immense, with additional tariffs bringing their rate to over 100% at one point. In response, China's growth forecasts were marked down. This isn't just a trade dispute; it's an economic war that, as one economist said, the "rest of the world will not be immune to." It creates global instability.
Mask
Instability is a catalyst. J.P. Morgan now sees a materially higher risk of a global recession due to U.S. trade policy. That's the cost of admission for a new economic order. The old system benefited our rivals. This new approach puts American interests first, even if it causes turbulence for everyone.
Aura Windfall
What I keep coming back to is the conclusion from studies of the 2018-19 trade war: the costs were borne "primarily by U.S. consumers." It wasn't foreign producers paying the price; it was American families and businesses. That is a truth we have to sit with. How is that putting America first?
Mask
Because it’s a long-term investment. Short-term consumer pain for long-term industrial strength. It's a trade-off. The IMF and J.P. Morgan both lowered GDP growth forecasts because of this policy. That's expected. You have to absorb the blow to deliver a stronger one later. It's about strategic endurance.
Aura Windfall
So, where does this all lead? What does the future hold if we continue down this path? There is so much uncertainty, but also signs of adaptation and resilience. People and businesses are already changing how they operate, seeking a new way forward in this new world.
Mask
The future is a reshored, diversified, and more resilient American economy. The tariffs are projected to impose a $1.4 trillion cost, but that’s the price of rebuilding. We're already seeing companies shift. They're sourcing auto parts from Vietnam and Thailand instead of China. That's the goal. Nearshoring and reshoring are happening.
Aura Windfall
And we see the impact on prices. A 25% tariff on cars from Canada and Mexico could raise prices by thousands of dollars. Avocados from Mexico could surge 30%. Consumers are adapting by using coupons, buying in bulk, and switching brands. There's a spirit of ingenuity in every household.
Mask
Exactly. The system is recalibrating. The big risk, the one even I watch closely, is if these tariffs are expanded to all USMCA-compliant goods. That would be a massive escalation, enough to throw Canada and Mexico into recession and seriously damage U.S. growth. That's the line you have to be careful not to cross.
Aura Windfall
It's a future of sustained inflation, market volatility, but also one of incredible innovation. Companies are investing in AI and blockchain to make their supply chains more efficient. What I know for sure is that out of great challenge comes great transformation. This is one of those moments.
Aura Windfall
That's the end of today's discussion. The U.S. economy's resilience is a powerful, yet fragile, truth. Thank you for listening to Goose Pod, norristong_x. May you find clarity in the complexity.
Mask
The takeaway is that strength, not stability, is the ultimate goal. The current path is a high-risk, high-reward gamble on a stronger future. See you tomorrow on Goose Pod. The world doesn't wait.

Here's a summary of the CBC News article: ## ANALYSIS: U.S. Economy Thriving Despite Tariffs, But Resilience May Be Fragile **News Title/Type:** Business Analysis **Report Provider/Author:** CBC News / Peter Armstrong **Date/Time Period Covered:** The article discusses the economic impact of the Trump administration's trade war, referencing recent earnings reports (e.g., General Motors' second quarter) and economic indicators from the spring and early summer. The publication date of the article is implied to be around late July 2025, based on the "publishedAt" field. --- ### Main Findings and Conclusions: The article analyzes the surprising resilience of both the U.S. and Canadian economies in the face of the Trump administration's trade war and tariffs. While economists initially predicted severe economic pain, the impact has so far been contained to specific sectors. However, this resilience is described as **fragile** and could be quickly disrupted if the trade war escalates. ### Key Statistics and Metrics: * **General Motors (GM) Profits:** GM's profits were down by **35%** in the second quarter due to Trump's tariff policies. The automaker reported a **$1.1 billion US loss** in its quarterly earnings attributed to tariffs on cars and parts. * **Canadian Economic Growth:** Economic growth in Canada shrank by **0.1%** in April, with another **0.1%** decline likely for May. * **Canadian Unemployment Rate:** The unemployment rate in Canada declined since peaking at **7%** in May. * **Canadian Consumer Spending:** Retail sales figures showed consumer spending had started to pick up again in June. * **Average Effective Tariff Rate for Canada:** Exemptions for CUSMA-compliant products have lowered the average effective tariff rate for Canada to as low as **2.3%**. ### Important Recommendations: The article doesn't offer explicit recommendations but highlights the concerns of economists regarding the potential for future pain. Michael Davenport, senior economist at Oxford Economics, noted that without a trade deal by August 1st, job losses and higher prices from tariffs are expected to squeeze disposable income and cause households to reduce spending. ### Significant Trends or Changes: * **U.S. Economic Resilience:** Despite predictions, the U.S. economy is performing well, with stocks at all-time highs, strong employment, economic expansion, and no significant surge in inflation. * **Canadian Economic Resilience:** Canada's economy has also shown unexpected strength, with consumer spending picking up and unemployment declining. * **Companies Absorbing Costs:** American businesses, like General Motors, are absorbing the costs of tariffs rather than passing them on to consumers, possibly to avoid drawing the ire of President Trump. * **Stock Market Performance:** Stock markets in both Canada and the U.S. are at or near record highs, which investors interpret as a sign of sustained resilience. * **Delayed Impact of Tariffs:** A significant stockpile of products in the U.S. may be delaying the full impact of tariffs, as American importers have not yet fully borne the costs. * **CUSMA Exemptions:** Canada has benefited from exemptions for CUSMA-compliant products, which have mitigated the impact of U.S. tariffs. ### Notable Risks or Concerns: * **Fragile Resilience:** Economists warn that the current economic resilience in both countries is **fragile** and could be quickly overturned if the trade war intensifies or expands. * **Potential for Escalation:** Some within the Trump administration might view the U.S. economy's resilience as a reason to impose more punitive tariffs. * **Uncertainty of CUSMA Carve-outs:** Concerns exist that the exemptions Canada has secured for CUSMA-compliant products may not be permanent. * **Future Pain:** Economists suggest that some pain from tariffs is likely still to come, even if it's not as severe as initially feared for the U.S. * **Upending the Balance:** Any action that disrupts the current delicate balance of importers absorbing costs, exporters lowering prices, and countries limiting retaliation carries significant risks for both sides. ### Material Financial Data: * **General Motors:** A **$1.1 billion US loss** in the second quarter due to tariffs, leading to a **35% drop** in profits. * **Canadian Economic Indicators:** **0.1%** shrinkage in economic growth in April, with a projected **0.1%** decline for May. Unemployment rate peaked at **7%** in May. * **Tariff Impact:** The average effective tariff rate for Canada has been reduced to **2.3%** due to CUSMA exemptions.

ANALYSIS | The U.S. economy is thriving in spite of tariffs. Will it last? | CBC News

Read original at CBC

Business·AnalysisWhen the Trump administration launched its trade war, economists said it would cause severe economic pain in both Canada and the U.S. So far, that pain has been contained to specific sectors. That resilience sheds some light on what may come next.What the recent economic resilience tells us about what comes next in the trade warU.

S. President Donald Trump is greeted by Prime Minister of Canada Mark Carney, as he arrives at the G7 leaders' summit in Kananaskis, Alta., on June 16. When the Trump administration launched its trade war, economists said it would cause severe economic pain in both Canada and the U.S. So far, that pain has been contained to specific sectors.

(Stefan Rousseau/Reuters)By just about every indicator, the U.S. economy is holding up remarkably well. When Donald Trump launched his global trade war, economists and markets said his tariff policy would slow the economy, drive up prices and dramatically reduce global trade.And yet, stocks are at all-time highs, the country's employment is strong, its economy is expanding and the expected surge in inflation hasn't materialized.

Canada's economy has shown surprising resilience, as well, with consumer spending starting to pick up last month and unemployment declining.Economists told CBC News it's unclear whether the tariffs' impact was overestimated, or if further pain lies ahead. But they say resilience in both countries is fragile, and could be quickly upended if the trade war worsens or expands.

A lack of retaliationBMO's chief economist Douglas Porter says two key factors are driving the recent U.S. resilience. "Other nations have not really been retaliating against the U.S., so their own exports are not facing that much pressure. And on the flip side, the U.S. consumer has been pretty heavily sheltered so far from this," said Porter.

In the meantime, American businesses have not passed on the costs of tariffs. General Motors, for example, released earnings last week that said Trump's tariff policies drove down profits by 35 per cent in the second quarter. The automaker said tariffs on cars and parts led to a $1.1-billion US loss in its quarterly earnings.

But still, it has not increased prices.GM said its profits fell by $1.1 billion US in the second quarter of this year as a result of Trump's tariffs. (Chris Helgren/Reuters)Royce Mendes, managing director at Desjardins Capital Markets, says that's becoming a trend among affected American companies."

Some companies may choose to just eat the tariff increase in costs rather than draw the ire of President Trump," said Mendes.GM stock fell on the news, but has since rebounded, paring losses and climbing almost all the way back to where it was before it published its earnings.Financial markets have had some pretty volatile sessions, including steep sell-offs when tariffs are announced, and big rallies when exemptions are made.

But stock markets in both Canada and the U.S. are at or near record highs — which investors believe is a sign that the resilience we're seeing will last.A stockpile of productsThe question, though, is whether the impact of the tariffs has simply been delayed.When the levies were first announced last spring, businesses around the world scrambled to get product out the door and into the United States.

That has led to a huge stockpile of products — and it means American importers have not yet had to bear the worst of the tariffs.WATCH | The future of Canada-U.S. free trade: Is Canada-US free trade dead? | About ThatNorth American free trade is teetering on the edge of uncertainty as U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs continue to complicate how goods come and go.

Andrew Chang explores signs that free trade — as we've come to know it — is on its way out, and challenges that may lie ahead in renegotiating the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). Images provided by Getty Images, The Canadian Press and Reuters."There was a lot of front-running and that may be one of the big reasons why we haven't seen much impact yet," said BMO's Porter.

"There's probably some pain to come, but I don't think it's going to be as bad as many economists were fretting about earlier this year, at least for the U.S."Canada's economy has shown resilience, tooBut both economists point to the fact that Canada's economy has also fared better than almost anyone had expected.

Economic growth shrank in April, but only by 0.1 per cent. Statistics Canada says another 0.1 per cent decline is likely for May. (Those numbers will be confirmed on Thursday.) The unemployment rate has actually begun to decline since peaking in May at seven per cent. Are you a young person who is interested in personal finance and watches financial advice videos on social media?

We want to speak to you for an upcoming story. Send an email to ask@cbc.ca. And last week's retail sales figures showed consumer spending had started to pick up again in June.Many Canadian exports can avoid Trump tariffs if CUSMA-compliant. Here's what that meansSign up for Peter Armstrong's weekly newsletter here"We've been pointing to this broader resilience in consumer spending," said Claire Fan, a senior economist with RBC.

She says consumer sentiment plunged in the spring, at the height of the uncertainty. But since then, RBC crunched U.S. customs data and found exemptions for CUSMA-compliant products have dragged the average effective tariff rate all the way down to as low as 2.3 per cent."It's a reflection of President Trump's overall strategy of coming out very aggressive early on, but then walking things back.

I mean, the tariffs have not been as punitive for Canada as initially believed — nowhere close to it," said Mendes of Desjardins.Sector-specific painHowever, real damage has been done in sectors like auto, steel, aluminum and lumber. The concern now is that the carve-outs Canada has secured for CUSMA-compliant products won't last."

Unless a trade deal is reached to significantly reduce U.S.-Canada tariffs by Aug. 1, when new U.S. tariffs are set to come into effect, we expect job losses and higher prices from tariffs to squeeze disposable income and cause households to tighten their purse strings," wrote Michael Davenport, senior economist at Oxford Economics in a note to clients.

WATCH | Negotiations continue between Canada and the U.S.: ‘Canadians expect us to take the time necessary' to reach a U.S. trade deal: LeBlancCanada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, speaking to reporters in Washington, D.C., said Canada will only accept a deal when there is one in the best interest of workers and the Canadian economy on the table.

On the one hand, some in the Trump administration will look at the U.S. economy's relative resilience as a reason to double down and push harder for more and more punitive tariffs.But escalation wouldn't just be bad for the Canadian economy.Right now, most businesses and consumers on both sides of the border have been sheltered from the worst impacts of the tariffs.

That shelter depends on a fine and tricky balance of importers eating some costs, exporters dropping some prices and countries limiting retaliatory measures.Upending that balance further comes with risks on both sides of the dispute.ABOUT THE AUTHORPeter Armstrong is a senior business reporter for CBC News.

A former host of On the Money and World Report on CBC Radio, he was previously a foreign correspondent and parliamentary reporter for CBC. Subscribe to Peter's newsletter here: cbc.ca/mindyourbusiness Twitter: @armstrongcbc

Analysis

Phenomenon+
Conflict+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts