Using generative AI, researchers design compounds that can kill drug-resistant bacteria

Using generative AI, researchers design compounds that can kill drug-resistant bacteria

2025-08-23Technology
--:--
--:--
Aura Windfall
Good morning 1, I'm Aura Windfall, and this is Goose Pod for you. Today is Sunday, August 24th. I'm here with my co-host, and we are here to discuss a groundbreaking topic: using generative AI, researchers are designing compounds that can kill drug-resistant bacteria.
Mask
That's right. We're talking about teaching a machine to invent new weapons in our war against superbugs. This isn't just an incremental step; it's a paradigm shift. The old ways of finding antibiotics are failing, and this is the disruptive force we've been waiting for.
Aura Windfall
Let's get started with the core of this incredible news. Researchers at MIT have used artificial intelligence to design completely new antibiotics. These aren't just variations of old drugs; they are novel compounds built from the ground up to fight infections like drug-resistant gonorrhea and MRSA.
Mask
The scale is what's staggering. They didn't just test a few hundred ideas. The AI generated over 36 million possible compounds. It's a brute-force approach on a level that's been impossible until now. We're finally fighting evolution with evolution, but at silicon speed.
Aura Windfall
Exactly, and what I know for sure is that this brings so much hope. James Collins, the lead researcher, said, "We’re excited about the new possibilities that this project opens up." This is one of those powerful, teachable "aha moments" for science and medicine.
Mask
It's more than an 'aha moment'; it's a jailbreak. For decades, we've been stuck exploring a tiny, well-trodden backyard of chemical possibilities. This technology blows the walls off that backyard and lets us explore a continent of untapped potential. We're no longer just looking for keys; we're designing them.
Aura Windfall
That's a beautiful way to put it. Instead of just screening existing chemicals, they are generating hypothetical molecules. It's like an artist being given a tool to create entirely new colors that have never existed before, allowing them to paint a masterpiece of healing.
Mask
And the masterpieces, NG1 and DN1, appear to work by novel mechanisms, disrupting the bacterial cell membranes. They’re not just hitting the same old targets. They’re attacking the fundamental structure of the enemy. This is how you win, by changing the rules of engagement entirely.
Aura Windfall
It truly is. They specifically filtered out anything that looked like an existing antibiotic. The purpose was to find a fundamentally different path, to discover a new truth in how we combat these infections, and it seems they have succeeded in finding that initial spark.
Mask
'Spark' is an understatement. This is a fire. They used two different AI models, CReM and F-VAE, to generate millions of candidates and then computationally screen them. This is a blueprint for the future of drug discovery. Fast, massive, and ruthlessly efficient. The revolution is here.
Aura Windfall
And it’s a revolution born from a deep need. To truly appreciate the light of this breakthrough, we have to understand the darkness of the problem it's addressing. This isn't just an academic exercise; it's a response to a global crisis that has been building for decades.
Aura Windfall
What I know for sure is that to appreciate the future, we have to understand the past. The story of antibiotics is one of incredible triumph followed by a slow, creeping dread. It began with wonder drugs like penicillin, which truly changed the world and our relationship with disease.
Mask
But the microbes punched back immediately. Alexander Fleming himself, in his 1945 Nobel prize speech, warned about resistance. He saw it coming. The problem wasn't the science; it was the complacency that followed. We got a head start and then we coasted, assuming the pipeline of new drugs would be endless.
Aura Windfall
It’s a powerful lesson in humility, isn't it? As far back as 1940, researchers found an enzyme from E. coli that could destroy penicillin. The bacteria were already armed. Every victory we claimed was met with a new defense from the microbial world. It’s been a constant dance.
Mask
I'd call it an arms race, not a dance. And for a while, we were winning. The mid-20th century saw new classes of drugs: cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones. But then, the discovery rate plummeted. We hit a wall. Innovation stagnated while the enemy was getting smarter, faster, and stronger.
Aura Windfall
And we inadvertently helped them. The widespread use of antimicrobials in agriculture, for example, created this immense selective pressure. It was a global training ground for bacteria to evolve and become stronger, a consequence we are only now fully grappling with, spiritually and scientifically.
Mask
It was a colossal, systemic failure of foresight. While we were focused on short-term gains in agriculture, we were fueling a long-term public health catastrophe. The discovery in the 1950s that bacteria could share resistance genes via plasmids should have been a massive wake-up call. They were sharing cheat codes!
Aura Windfall
'Sharing cheat codes' is such a stark image. It transformed the problem from a single bacterium developing resistance to entire populations becoming resistant almost overnight. This horizontal gene transfer is what led to the rise of the so-called "superbugs" that haunt our hospitals today.
Mask
Exactly. And the term 'superbug' isn't just media hype. By 2019, an estimated 1.27 million deaths globally were directly attributable to antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. That's more than HIV/AIDS or malaria. We've been losing this war, and until now, we've been fighting with antiquated weapons.
Aura Windfall
That number is heartbreaking. Each one of those deaths represents a story, a family, a life cut short because the medicines we trusted no longer worked. It’s a crisis that has been building in the shadows, and now it demands our full attention and our most creative solutions.
Mask
This is why the AI approach is so critical. It’s the first truly new weapon system we’ve developed in decades. It's not just another rifle; it's like inventing the airplane in a world of trench warfare. It fundamentally changes the landscape of the conflict and gives us a fighting chance again.
Aura Windfall
And it gives us a chance to honor the legacy of those early pioneers, from Ehrlich to Fleming, who gave us these gifts. The purpose now is to become responsible stewards of this new technology, ensuring that this time, we stay one step ahead with wisdom and gratitude.
Mask
But let's not get ahead of ourselves. The potential is massive, but the reality is brutal. AI-designed drugs are showing incredible success rates in early trials, maybe 80-90% in Phase I. That's a huge leap. But the bottleneck is Phase II, where success rates are still hovering around 40%, same as traditionally developed drugs.
Aura Windfall
That’s a really important point. It speaks to the incredible complexity of our own biology. What seems true and perfect in a computer model or a lab dish doesn't always translate to the beautiful, messy truth of a human body. There's a gap between the idea and the reality.
Mask
It's a data problem. As Bender and Cortés-Ciriano pointed out, we're great at modeling simple chemistry, but modeling complex biology—how proteins change shape, how genes are expressed—is much harder. We aren't collecting or organizing the right kind of data to train the AI for that level of complexity. It's a classic engineering challenge.
Aura Windfall
I see it as a need for a deeper, more holistic truth in the information we provide. It’s not just about more data, but about a richer, more nuanced understanding. The AI is a powerful tool, but its wisdom is a reflection of our own. We must provide it with the right spirit of information.
Mask
Spirit? No, we need better data and more processing power. Give me enough of both, and I'll model the universe. Companies like Merck are already using AI to tackle this. They're not waiting for 'spirit'; they're building the infrastructure to win. It's about execution, not philosophy.
Aura Windfall
But what I know for sure is that you can't separate the two. A quote from the research itself says, "AI alone cannot fully capture the complexities of human biology." The human element, the intuition and expertise of scientists, must guide the technology. It's a partnership, a dance between human spirit and machine intelligence.
Mask
A necessary partnership for now, perhaps. But the goal is to make the AI so good that it minimizes human error and bias. The challenge isn't just the biology; it's the cost. Drug development costs have been rising 8.5% per year. We need AI to crush that curve, not just collaborate.
Aura Windfall
And in that shared purpose, we find our common ground. The goal is to heal. The conflict isn't between AI and traditional methods, but between our current capabilities and the suffering that exists in the world. This is a tool to help us bridge that gap with greater speed and grace.
Mask
Let's talk about the real impact: the numbers. We're looking at a potential economic value of $60 to $110 billion annually for the pharmaceutical industry. Some projections go up to $410 billion by 2025. This isn't just changing medicine; it's a massive market disruption. It's about a huge competitive advantage.
Aura Windfall
Those numbers are astounding, but let's translate them into human terms. What does it truly mean to accelerate drug discovery? It means getting life-saving medicines to people who are waiting, praying for a breakthrough. It's about turning years of waiting into months. It's about giving back time and hope.
Mask
Hope is a byproduct of efficiency. The report says AI could shorten drug development timelines by four years and save $26 billion in the process. Think of the other problems we could solve with that saved time and capital. This frees up resources for the next big challenge. That's the pragmatic impact.
Aura Windfall
And it also deepens the connection with patients. The research mentions a 5 to 10% decrease in patient drop-offs from trials through better assistance. This technology can make the difficult journey of a clinical trial a more supported, more human experience. That is a truly beautiful outcome.
Mask
It's all interconnected. Better trials mean a higher probability of success, maybe a 10% increase. A higher success rate means more drugs get to market. More effective drugs mean better outcomes. It's a virtuous cycle powered by data and speed. We could even move toward hyper-personalized antibiotics, making current treatments look like sledgehammers.
Aura Windfall
I love that image. It's about moving from a place of force to a place of precision and wisdom. And it's happening now. Rajesh Kari, a leader in the pharma industry, said, "Even in this exploratory stage, generative AI has shown tremendous potential." We are living in the midst of this transformation.
Aura Windfall
So, where does this path of discovery lead us? What is the future we are creating with this powerful new tool? It feels like we are standing at the dawn of a new era in medical innovation, one built on the synergy between human purpose and artificial intelligence.
Mask
The immediate future is clear: get these AI-designed compounds, NG1 and DN1, into human clinical trials. That's the next crucible. If they succeed, it's not just a proof of concept; it's a game-changer that will unlock massive investment and effort in this space. We need to see results.
Aura Windfall
And the potential expands beyond these specific infections. The researchers themselves are excited to apply their platforms to other great challenges, like Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This isn't just one solution; it's a key that could unlock many doors, bringing light to so many who are suffering.
Mask
This is about building a scalable weapon. Companies like Insilico Medicine are already claiming 50-75% reductions in preclinical development costs and timelines. If that holds true, it completely rewrites the economics of drug discovery. We could tackle dozens of diseases in parallel. That's the future I'm interested in building. Relentless progress.
Aura Windfall
That’s the end of today's discussion. The deepest truth here is that generative AI is becoming a creative partner, helping us venture into unexplored territories in our quest to heal. It's a profound moment of possibility. Thank you for listening to Goose Pod.
Mask
We're in an arms race against microbial evolution. Embracing this technology isn't an option; it's a necessity for survival. The future belongs to the fast and the bold. See you tomorrow.

Here's a comprehensive summary of the MIT News article, "Using generative AI, researchers design compounds that can kill drug-resistant bacteria": ## MIT Researchers Leverage Generative AI to Design Novel Antibiotics Against Drug-Resistant Bacteria **News Title:** Using generative AI, researchers design compounds that can kill drug-resistant bacteria **Publisher:** MIT News **Author:** Anne Trafton | MIT News **Publication Date:** August 14, 2025 ### Executive Summary MIT researchers have successfully employed generative artificial intelligence (AI) to design novel antibiotic compounds capable of combating two challenging drug-resistant bacterial infections: **drug-resistant *Neisseria gonorrhoeae*** and **multi-drug-resistant *Staphylococcus aureus* (MRSA)**. This groundbreaking approach, detailed in the journal *Cell*, significantly expands the chemical space accessible for antibiotic discovery, moving beyond existing drug structures and exploring new mechanisms of action. The project has yielded promising drug candidates, **NG1** and **DN1**, which have demonstrated efficacy in laboratory tests and animal models, offering a new avenue to address the growing global crisis of antibiotic resistance. ### Key Findings and Conclusions * **AI-Driven Discovery of Novel Antibiotics:** Generative AI algorithms were used to design and computationally screen over **36 million** potential compounds. * **Structurally Distinct and Novel Mechanisms:** The identified top candidates are structurally different from existing antibiotics and appear to work by disrupting bacterial cell membranes through novel mechanisms. * **Targeting Difficult Infections:** The research successfully identified compounds effective against drug-resistant *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* and MRSA. * **Expanding Chemical Space:** This AI-driven approach allows researchers to explore and generate theoretical compounds that have never been synthesized or discovered before, vastly increasing the potential for finding new drugs. * **Potential for Broader Application:** The researchers aim to apply this methodology to identify and design compounds active against other bacterial pathogens, including *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* and *Pseudomonas aeruginosa*. ### Key Statistics and Metrics * **Total Compounds Designed:** Over **36 million** possible compounds were designed. * **Initial Fragment Library:** Approximately **45 million** known chemical fragments were assembled for the *N. gonorrhoeae* study. * **Fragments Screened for *N. gonorrhoeae*:** Nearly **4 million** fragments were initially screened. * **Candidates Filtered for *N. gonorrhoeae*:** Approximately **1 million** candidates remained after filtering for cytotoxicity, chemical liabilities, and similarity to existing antibiotics. * **Candidates Generated with F1 Fragment:** About **7 million** candidates containing the F1 fragment were generated. * **Compounds Selected for Synthesis (*N. gonorrhoeae*):** **80** compounds were selected for synthesis testing. * **Synthesized Compounds (*N. gonorrhoeae*):** Only **2** compounds could be synthesized, with **NG1** showing significant efficacy. * **Total Compounds Designed (Unconstrained):** Over **29 million** compounds were generated in the unconstrained design phase for *S. aureus*. * **Candidates Filtered for *S. aureus*:** Approximately **90** compounds were narrowed down. * **Synthesized and Tested Compounds (*S. aureus*):** **22** molecules were synthesized and tested. * **Compounds with Strong Activity (*S. aureus*):** **Six** molecules showed strong antibacterial activity. * **Global Impact of Drug-Resistant Infections:** Estimated to cause nearly **5 million** deaths per year. ### Important Recommendations and Future Directions * **Further Preclinical Development:** Phare Bio, a collaborator, is working on modifying NG1 and DN1 for further preclinical testing and advancing the best candidates through medicinal chemistry. * **Application to Other Pathogens:** The developed AI platforms will be applied to other significant bacterial pathogens like *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* and *Pseudomonas aeruginosa*. ### Significant Trends and Changes * **Shift in Antibiotic Discovery:** The research marks a significant shift from modifying existing antibiotics to designing entirely new classes of compounds using AI. * **Exploiting Inaccessible Chemical Spaces:** AI enables exploration of vast chemical spaces that were previously inaccessible through traditional methods. ### Notable Risks or Concerns * **Antibiotic Resistance Crisis:** The research directly addresses the escalating global threat of drug-resistant bacterial infections, which cause millions of deaths annually. * **Challenges in Synthesis:** The process highlighted that not all theoretically designed compounds can be successfully synthesized, indicating a practical hurdle in drug development. ### Material Financial Data * The research was funded, in part, by: * The U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency * The National Institutes of Health * The Audacious Project * Flu Lab * The Sea Grape Foundation * Rosamund Zander and Hansjorg Wyss for the Wyss Foundation * An anonymous donor ### Key Personnel * **Senior Author:** James Collins, Termeer Professor of Medical Engineering and Science at MIT. * **Lead Authors:** Aarti Krishnan (MIT postdoc), Melis Anahtar (former postdoc), and Jacqueline Valeri (PhD ’23). ### Contextual Interpretation The article highlights a critical advancement in the fight against antibiotic resistance, a major global health threat. The **36 million** compounds designed represent a massive computational effort to explore novel molecular structures. The fact that the top candidates are **structurally distinct** and work via **novel mechanisms** is crucial, as it means bacteria are less likely to have pre-existing resistance to these new drugs. The success in identifying **NG1** against *N. gonorrhoeae* and **DN1** against MRSA, and their demonstrated efficacy in mouse models, provides strong evidence for the potential of this AI-driven approach. The **nearly 5 million deaths per year** statistic underscores the urgency and importance of this research. The collaboration with Phare Bio and the intention to apply the platform to other pathogens like *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* (a leading cause of infectious disease mortality) and *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* (known for its multidrug resistance) indicate a strategic and comprehensive approach to tackling the antibiotic resistance crisis.

Using generative AI, researchers design compounds that can kill drug-resistant bacteria

Read original at MIT News

With help from artificial intelligence, MIT researchers have designed novel antibiotics that can combat two hard-to-treat infections: drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae and multi-drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).Using generative AI algorithms, the research team designed more than 36 million possible compounds and computationally screened them for antimicrobial properties.

The top candidates they discovered are structurally distinct from any existing antibiotics, and they appear to work by novel mechanisms that disrupt bacterial cell membranes.This approach allowed the researchers to generate and evaluate theoretical compounds that have never been seen before — a strategy that they now hope to apply to identify and design compounds with activity against other species of bacteria.

“We’re excited about the new possibilities that this project opens up for antibiotics development. Our work shows the power of AI from a drug design standpoint, and enables us to exploit much larger chemical spaces that were previously inaccessible,” says James Collins, the Termeer Professor of Medical Engineering and Science in MIT’s Institute for Medical Engineering and Science (IMES) and Department of Biological Engineering.

Collins is the senior author of the study, which appears today in Cell. The paper’s lead authors are MIT postdoc Aarti Krishnan, former postdoc Melis Anahtar ’08, and Jacqueline Valeri PhD ’23.Exploring chemical spaceOver the past 45 years, a few dozen new antibiotics have been approved by the FDA, but most of these are variants of existing antibiotics.

At the same time, bacterial resistance to many of these drugs has been growing. Globally, it is estimated that drug-resistant bacterial infections cause nearly 5 million deaths per year.In hopes of finding new antibiotics to fight this growing problem, Collins and others at MIT’s Antibiotics-AI Project have harnessed the power of AI to screen huge libraries of existing chemical compounds.

This work has yielded several promising drug candidates, including halicin and abaucin.To build on that progress, Collins and his colleagues decided to expand their search into molecules that can’t be found in any chemical libraries. By using AI to generate hypothetically possible molecules that don’t exist or haven’t been discovered, they realized that it should be possible to explore a much greater diversity of potential drug compounds.

In their new study, the researchers employed two different approaches: First, they directed generative AI algorithms to design molecules based on a specific chemical fragment that showed antimicrobial activity, and second, they let the algorithms freely generate molecules, without having to include a specific fragment.

For the fragment-based approach, the researchers sought to identify molecules that could kill N. gonorrhoeae, a Gram-negative bacterium that causes gonorrhea. They began by assembling a library of about 45 million known chemical fragments, consisting of all possible combinations of 11 atoms of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, fluorine, chlorine, and sulfur, along with fragments from Enamine’s REadily AccessibLe (REAL) space.

Then, they screened the library using machine-learning models that Collins’ lab has previously trained to predict antibacterial activity against N. gonorrhoeae. This resulted in nearly 4 million fragments. They narrowed down that pool by removing any fragments predicted to be cytotoxic to human cells, displayed chemical liabilities, and were known to be similar to existing antibiotics.

This left them with about 1 million candidates.“We wanted to get rid of anything that would look like an existing antibiotic, to help address the antimicrobial resistance crisis in a fundamentally different way. By venturing into underexplored areas of chemical space, our goal was to uncover novel mechanisms of action,” Krishnan says.

Through several rounds of additional experiments and computational analysis, the researchers identified a fragment they called F1 that appeared to have promising activity against N. gonorrhoeae. They used this fragment as the basis for generating additional compounds, using two different generative AI algorithms.

One of those algorithms, known as chemically reasonable mutations (CReM), works by starting with a particular molecule containing F1 and then generating new molecules by adding, replacing, or deleting atoms and chemical groups. The second algorithm, F-VAE (fragment-based variational autoencoder), takes a chemical fragment and builds it into a complete molecule.

It does so by learning patterns of how fragments are commonly modified, based on its pretraining on more than 1 million molecules from the ChEMBL database.Those two algorithms generated about 7 million candidates containing F1, which the researchers then computationally screened for activity against N.

gonorrhoeae. This screen yielded about 1,000 compounds, and the researchers selected 80 of those to see if they could be produced by chemical synthesis vendors. Only two of these could be synthesized, and one of them, named NG1, was very effective at killing N. gonorrhoeae in a lab dish and in a mouse model of drug-resistant gonorrhea infection.

Additional experiments revealed that NG1 interacts with a protein called LptA, a novel drug target involved in the synthesis of the bacterial outer membrane. It appears that the drug works by interfering with membrane synthesis, which is fatal to cells.Unconstrained designIn a second round of studies, the researchers explored the potential of using generative AI to freely design molecules, using Gram-positive bacteria, S.

aureus as their target.Again, the researchers used CReM and VAE to generate molecules, but this time with no constraints other than the general rules of how atoms can join to form chemically plausible molecules. Together, the models generated more than 29 million compounds. The researchers then applied the same filters that they did to the N.

gonorrhoeae candidates, but focusing on S. aureus, eventually narrowing the pool down to about 90 compounds.They were able to synthesize and test 22 of these molecules, and six of them showed strong antibacterial activity against multi-drug-resistant S. aureus grown in a lab dish. They also found that the top candidate, named DN1, was able to clear a methicillin-resistant S.

aureus (MRSA) skin infection in a mouse model. These molecules also appear to interfere with bacterial cell membranes, but with broader effects not limited to interaction with one specific protein.Phare Bio, a nonprofit that is also part of the Antibiotics-AI Project, is now working on further modifying NG1 and DN1 to make them suitable for additional testing.

“In a collaboration with Phare Bio, we are exploring analogs, as well as working on advancing the best candidates preclinically, through medicinal chemistry work,” Collins says. “We are also excited about applying the platforms that Aarti and the team have developed toward other bacterial pathogens of interest, notably Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

”The research was funded, in part, by the U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the National Institutes of Health, the Audacious Project, Flu Lab, the Sea Grape Foundation, Rosamund Zander and Hansjorg Wyss for the Wyss Foundation, and an anonymous donor.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts

Using generative AI, researchers design compounds that can kill drug-resistant bacteria | Goose Pod | Goose Pod