AI 接管教育才刚刚开始

AI 接管教育才刚刚开始

2025-08-14Technology
--:--
--:--
小撒
早上好,老王!欢迎收听专为您打造的 Goose Pod。今天是8月15日,星期五,早上7点01分。我是小撒。今天我们来聊一个火热的话题:AI 接管教育才刚刚开始。
诗仙李白
听众老王,安好。吾乃诗仙李白。幸会于此电波之中,与君共探这“人工智能”之玄妙,观其如何搅动今日之学堂。
小撒
好,让我们马上开始。李白兄,你想象一下,以前我们谈AI进课堂,总觉得是未来的事,但现在,它已经是“开门七件事”之一了。就拿迈阿密戴德公立学校来说,他们一开始也是严防死守,禁止学生用ChatGPT,结果现在呢?态度180度大转弯,开始制定AI指导方针了。
诗仙李白
哦?此举颇有意思。朝令夕改,莫非是悟得了其中关窍?正如大禹治水,堵不如疏。此“智能”之洪流,看来是挡不住了,唯有善加引导,方能化水为利,灌溉桃李。
小撒
说得太对了,就是“堵不如疏”。他们搞了一个“分层框架”,说白了就是把AI的使用分门别类。有些任务完全不准用,比如期末大考;有些可以辅助用,查查资料、润色一下语言;有些则可以放开手脚用,比如做一些创意思考。跟咱们古代用火一样,能煮饭取暖,但不能让它烧了房子。
诗仙李白
善哉!此乃“无规矩不成方圆”之理。纵有神兵利器,亦需章法驾驭,方能利国利民,而非伤人害己。这“分层框架”,便是为这匹“智能”千里马,配上了黄金鞍,勒上了规矩绳。
小撒
正是如此。而且这已经不是某个地方学校的“单打独斗”了,美国教育部都下场了,联合堪萨斯大学发布了一个全国性的“负责任的AI整合框架”。这就像是朝廷颁布了一本《AI教养指南》,发给全国的学校,告诉大家怎么养育这条“AI小龙”,才能让它茁壮成长,而不是到处喷火惹祸。
诗仙李白
“朝廷”亦出手,足见其事之重。然,“画龙点睛”之笔,终在人手。神器虽利,匠心为魂。若失却师者之判断,纵有通天之智,亦不过无魂之木偶也。这指南中,可曾提及如何固本培元,守住为师之“道”?
小撒
问到点子上了!这个框架的核心就是“以人为本”,强调教育者的判断力至关重要。而且特别提到一个关键问题,就是公平。要确保这个强大的新工具能被所有学生使用,无论贫富。这涉及到一种新的“经济分配”,只不过这次分配的不是金钱,而是获取未来知识和能力的权利。
诗仙李白
妙极!“天之道,损有余而补不足”。这智能之光,理应普照大地,而非独亮于朱门。若能借此神器,弥合贫富之沟壑,令寒门学子亦能“朝为田舍郎,暮登天子堂”,实乃功在千秋之伟业!
小撒
没错。不过,要想看清AI这条“龙”未来要飞向何方,咱们得先回头看看,它是从哪条小溪里游出来的。毕竟,技术闯入教室这事儿,可不是今天才发生的。整个教育科技的发展史,就像一部精彩的连续剧。
诗仙李白
哦?愿闻其详。想我当年,唯有笔墨纸砚,足矣挥洒乾坤。不知这百年学堂,都经历了哪些“机关”之变?
小撒
那得从上世纪80年代说起了。那时候,个人电脑刚出现,学校里最时髦的就是“计算机房”。学生们排着队去玩一款叫《俄勒冈之旅》的游戏,感觉就像过节一样。那时候的技术,只是个偶尔才能尝到的“新奇点心”,是教学的边缘工具。
诗仙李白
《俄勒冈之旅》?听其名,莫非是“读万卷书,行万里路”之数字演绎乎?于方寸荧屏之上,体验跋山涉水之艰辛,倒也有趣。此“点心”虽小,却已开启了新世界的一扇窗。
小撒
正是这个意思。到了90年代,互联网和电子邮件来了,技术开始“补充”教学。它就像是从前的“驿站”,但传递信息的速度快了成千上万倍。老师可以用它发作业,学生可以上网查资料,技术从“点心”变成了“饭后水果”,虽然不是主食,但也常见了。
诗仙李白
“朝辞白帝彩云间,千里江陵一日还”。未曾想,千年之后,知识之传递,竟能瞬息而至!此非“朝闻道,夕死可矣”之境乎?信息之快,令人神往,亦令人忧思。真伪杂陈,学子当如何明辨?
小撒
您这问题,恰好就是2000年代要解决的。那个时代,政策开始强调“不让一个孩子掉队”,智能手机、笔记本电脑普及了,在线成绩单、学习管理系统(LMS)也出现了。技术不再是“饭后水果”,而是变成了“餐具”,成了教学流程中不可或缺的一部分,帮助老师管理和评估。
诗仙李白
原来如此,从“点心”到“水果”,再到“餐具”,这譬喻倒是精妙。技术已然登堂入室,与教书育人之事,日益交融。那么时至今日,它又变成了什么呢?莫非已是那“米饭”本身?
小撒
比喻得太形象了!可以说,AI出现之前的时代,技术已经是烹饪的“水和火”了。平板电脑、个性化学习软件,让“因材施教”这个几千年的梦想,第一次有了大规模实现的可能。技术的角色,从传递信息的工具,变成了塑造学习体验本身的基础设施。
诗仙李白
“因材施教”,此乃孔圣之夙愿。若真能借此“机关”之力,为万千学子量身裁定学业之路,善莫大焉。然,时代变迁,今日之学堂,所授为何?所求为何?可还是我辈所熟悉的“礼、乐、射、御、书、数”?
小撒
“六艺”在精神上是相通的,但形式上已经迭代了。现在最常提的是“4C”能力,也就是批判性思维(Critical Thinking)、沟通(Communication)、协作(Collaboration)和创造力(Creativity)。这被认为是适应未来社会的“新六艺”。不再是要求学生记住多少知识,而是看他们能用知识做什么。
诗仙李白
嗯,“格物致知,诚意正心”之本,看来万古长青。这“新六艺”,听来更重应用与思辨。此亦是为应对这纷繁复杂之世情,所必须之能。这便为AI的登场,铺好了舞台啊。
小撒
没错,舞台已经搭好,但主角一登场,冲突就来了。AI这个能力超强的“演员”,让学术诚信这场大戏变得异常复杂。数据显示,86%的美国学生已经在使用AI。当一个工具能帮你写诗、解题、写论文时,那条“使用”与“作弊”的界线,就像是用墨水画在水上,模糊不清了。
诗仙李白
此乃“水能载舟,亦能覆舟”之理。智慧之泉,既可灌溉良田,亦可泛滥成灾,冲毁诚信之堤。此“真伪之辩”,自古有之。如今借由这“智能”之躯壳,愈演愈烈罢了。
小撒
而且现在的学生用AI,手法可高明多了。已经不是简单的复制粘贴了,他们会让不同的AI模型生成内容,然后自己缝合起来,甚至还让AI故意制造一些小错误,显得更像“人”写的。这简直是一场“道高一尺,魔高一丈”的军备竞赛,传统的查重软件都快跟不上了。
诗仙李白
呵呵,小聪明耳。然“心诚则灵”。若为学之初心不正,纵有千般变化,终是镜花水月,一触即破。知识之真伪易辨,然学问之深浅,却需真才实学方能显现。面试之时,应对之间,立见分晓。
小撒
确实如此,所以很多教育者的共识也变了。他们认为,与其投入巨大精力去“抓作弊”,不如把这变成一个学习机会。核心是“维持评估的完整性”,并教学生如何负责任地使用AI。就好比,我们不禁止学生使用计算器,但要确保他们理解了数学原理,而不是只会按按钮。
诗仙李白
善哉!“授人以鱼,不如授人以渔”。与其禁绝此器,不如教之以德,导之以正途。使其明辨何时可用,何时不可用,为何处可用,为何处不可用。这才是为师者“传道”之真谛。
小撒
正是这个道理。所以,学校开始制定非常明确的政策。比如,你可以用AI来做头脑风暴,但最终提交的报告必须是你自己写的;你可以用AI来检查语法,但不能用它来生成核心论点。把规则讲清楚,让学生和家长都明白,避免“无心之过”。这才是解决冲突的根本之道。
小撒
那么,当AI真正在教室里安家落户后,到底带来了什么实际影响呢?最大的改变,就是教师的角色。他们不再仅仅是知识的传授者,更像是学生学习旅途中的“教练”和“向导”。工作重心从“教”转向了“育”。
诗仙李白
“师者,所以传道受业解惑也”。形态虽变,其“解惑”之本,“传道”之核,未曾易也。昔日夫子循循善诱,今日师者借AI之力,为学子指点迷津,异曲同工,皆为育人之功。
小撒
说得好!而且AI给老师们带来了实实在在的“减负”。有研究预测,现有技术能将教师20%到40%的工作时间自动化,每周大约能节省出13个小时。这些时间,老师可以用来和学生进行一对一的交流,或者设计更有创意的课程,而不是埋首于批改作业的文山会海之中。
诗仙李白
妙哉!将繁文缛节,付与机关之巧;留清心明性,以育桃李芬芳。此乃“大巧若拙”之境地。让师者有更多心力去点燃学生心中的火焰,而非仅仅是填充他们的脑袋。这是技术的善用。
小撒
但有趣的是,学生们似乎没有老师那么热情。一项调查显示,只有35%的学生觉得AI对他们的学业有积极影响。很多学生反映,像ChatGPT这样的工具“经常出错”,生成的内容质量不高。看来,身处第一线的学生们,对这个新工具的“神通广大”有更清醒的认识。
诗仙李白
真金不怕火炼。学问之道,在于“切磋琢磨”。若此神器所出皆为瑕疵之玉,又怎能瞒过求知若渴之慧眼?学子之疑,恰恰说明他们并未盲从,仍在用自己的头脑去审视、去判断,此乃好事!
小撒
确实是好事。展望未来,大家的共识是,AI将作为教师的辅助工具,而不是替代品。未来的重点是培养所有人的“AI素养”,也就是理解并善用AI的能力。这就好比汽车发明了,我们每个人都需要学交规、学驾驶,而不是让汽车自己横冲直撞。
诗仙李白
未来之道,在于“人机合一”,各展其长。机器之算,辅以人心之暖;智能之速,佐以人师之德。方能“青出于蓝而胜于蓝”,培养出超越前人的后辈。
小撒
完全正确。所以现在各种教师培训项目层出不穷。谷歌就投资了2500万美元,专门用来培训教育工作者。你不能把一把绝世好剑塞给一个普通人,就指望他成为绝顶高手。必须得教他剑法、剑理,还有最重要的“剑德”,也就是使用的伦理。
诗仙李白
然也。“宝剑锋从磨砺出,梅花香自苦寒来”。无千锤百炼,不成良匠。此理,古今皆同。看来这AI时代的教育,对师者提出了更高的要求,也开启了更广阔的天地。
小撒
总结一下,AI正像一股不可阻挡的浪潮,重塑着教育的方方面面。但浪潮之巅,真正把握方向的,永远是教师的智慧、人性的关怀和学生独立思考的能力。好了,今天就到这里。感谢您收听 Goose Pod。咱们明天再见。
诗仙李白
智慧之器,终为育人之用。愿科技之光,辉映杏坛,文脉永昌。老王,感谢收听 Goose Pod,明日再会。

## The AI Takeover of Education Is Just Getting Started This article from **The Atlantic**, authored by **Lila Shroff**, explores the pervasive and accelerating integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into K-12 education, highlighting both its potential benefits and significant challenges. The news covers the period since the release of ChatGPT, with a particular focus on the current school year and future projections. ### Key Findings and Trends: * **Ubiquitous Student AI Use:** Students, particularly rising seniors, have grown up with AI tools like ChatGPT. While initially used for simple copy-pasting, students are now employing more sophisticated methods to evade plagiarism detectors, such as stitching together output from multiple AI models or intentionally introducing typos. AI is also being used for legitimate purposes like exam preparation, personalized study guides, practice tests, and assignment feedback. The article asserts that it's highly probable that most high schoolers are using chatbots for homework assistance, whether sanctioned or not. * **Educator AI Adoption:** Teachers are increasingly using AI in their own work to alleviate administrative burdens. * **Weekly Use:** Nearly **one-third of K–12 teachers** reported using AI at least weekly during the past school year. * **Time Savings:** Sally Hubbard, a sixth-grade math-and-science teacher, estimates AI saves her **5 to 10 hours each week** by assisting with assignment creation and curriculum supplementation. * **AI Tools for Educators:** Beyond general chatbots, specialized AI tools are emerging for educators. * **MagicSchool AI:** This platform is used by approximately **2.5 million teachers in the United States**, with the founder believing there's a user in "every school district in the country." It helps generate rubrics, worksheets, and report-card comments. * **District-Level AI Initiatives:** While some AI integration has been small-scale and instructor-driven, some school districts are adopting AI more broadly. * **Miami-Dade County Public Schools:** Initially banned chatbots, the district has since rolled out Google's Gemini chatbot to high-school classrooms for tasks like role-playing historical figures and providing tutoring. * **Iowa:** Made an AI-powered reading tutor available to all state elementary schools. * **School Counselor Shortages:** Chatbots are being used to fill gaps in school counselor availability. * **Disparities in AI Access and Permissiveness:** A study across 20 states in the South and Midwest found that rural and lower-income students were **least likely to report their schools permitting AI use**. * **Risks and Concerns:** * **Houston Independent School District (HISD):** Serves as a cautionary tale. The district's curriculum was reportedly "tainted with AI slop," including AI-generated art mimicking the Harlem Renaissance and error-laden worksheets with nonsensical questions. * **Government and Industry Support:** * **Executive Order:** President Donald Trump signed an executive order promoting AI use in classrooms to train teachers and ensure children gain AI expertise from an early age. * **Microsoft Pledges:** Microsoft committed **over $4 billion** to advance AI education across K-12, community colleges, and nonprofits. * **Teacher Union Partnership:** The American Federation of Teachers announced a **$23 million partnership** with Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic. This partnership will launch a "National Academy for AI Instruction" in New York City this fall, with plans to expand nationally to reach **10 percent of U.S. teachers over the next five years**. ### Recommendations and Perspectives: * **Need for Evolution:** Education Secretary Miguel Cardona emphasizes that schools must evolve to avoid putting students at an international disadvantage. * **Pedagogical Adaptations:** Some classrooms are reintroducing traditional assessment methods like in-class essays, oral exams, and blue-book exams to counter AI-driven outsourcing of writing and thinking. * **The "Semantic Issue" of Cheating:** Alex Kotran, co-founder of the AI Education Project, suggests that whether students using AI for homework constitutes cheating is becoming a "semantic issue," given AI's efficiency-boosting nature. * **Finding a Middle Ground:** Kotran advocates for a balanced approach, suggesting that even if widespread AI use is inevitable, prioritizing immediate, extensive hands-on student interaction with AI might not be the best strategy, drawing an analogy to the early days of the iPhone. ### Conclusion: The article concludes that AI's integration into education is an irreversible reality. The choices schools make now regarding AI adoption will significantly shape its future role in students' lives and, by extension, the broader trajectory of AI development. The challenge lies in navigating this evolving landscape to enhance education without compromising fundamental learning and critical thinking skills.

The AI Takeover of Education Is Just Getting Started

Read original at The Atlantic

Rising seniors are the last class of students who remember high school before ChatGPT. But only just barely: OpenAI’s chatbot was released months into their freshman year. Ever since then, writing essays hasn’t required, well, writing. By the time these students graduate next spring, they will have completed almost four full years of AI high school.

Gone already are the days when using AI to write an essay meant copying and pasting its response verbatim. To evade plagiarism detectors, kids now stitch together output from multiple AI models, or ask chatbots to introduce typos to make the writing appear more human. The original ChatGPT allowed only text prompts.

Now students can upload images (“Please do these physics problems for me”) and entire documents (“How should I improve my essay based on this rubric?”). Not all of it is cheating. Kids are using AI for exam prep, generating personalized study guides and practice tests, and to get feedback before submitting assignments.

Still, if you are a parent of a high schooler who thinks your child isn’t using a chatbot for homework assistance—be it sanctioned or illicit—think again.Read: AI cheating is getting worseThe AI takeover of the classroom is just getting started. Plenty of educators are using AI in their own job, even if they may not love that chatbots give students new ways to cheat.

On top of the time they spend on actual instruction, teachers are stuck with a lot of administrative work: They design assignments to align with curricular standards, grade worksheets against preset rubrics, and fill out paperwork to support students with extra needs. Nearly a third of K–12 teachers say they used the technology at least weekly last school year.

Sally Hubbard, a sixth-grade math-and-science teacher in Sacramento, California, told me that AI saves her an average of five to 10 hours each week by helping her create assignments and supplement curricula. “If I spend all of that time creating, grading, researching,” she said, “then I don’t have as much energy to show up in person and make connections with kids.

”Beyond ChatGPT and other popular chatbots, educators are turning to AI tools that have been specifically designed for them. Using MagicSchool AI, instructors can upload course material and other relevant documents to generate rubrics, worksheets, and report-card comments. Roughly 2.5 million teachers in the United States currently use the platform: “We have reason to believe that there is a MagicSchool user in every school district in the country,” Adeel Khan, the company’s founder, told me.

I tried out the platform for myself: One tool generated a sixth-grade algebra problem about tickets for Taylor Swift’s Eras tour: “If the price increased at a constant rate, what was the slope (rate of change) in dollars per day?” Another, “Teacher Jokes,” was underwhelming. I asked for a joke on the Cold War for 11th graders: “Why did the Cold War never get hot?

” the bot wrote. “Because they couldn’t agree on a temperature!”So far, much AI experimentation in the classroom has been small-scale, driven by tech-enthusiastic instructors such as Hubbard. This spring, she fed her course material into an AI tool to produce a short podcast on thermodynamics. Her students then listened as invented hosts discussed the laws of energy transfer.

“The AI says something that doesn’t make sense,” she told her students. “See if you can listen for that.” But some school districts are going all in on AI. Miami’s public-school system, the third-largest in the country, initially banned the use of chatbots. Over the past year, the district reversed course, rolling out Google’s Gemini chatbot to high-school classrooms where teachers are now using it to role-play historical figures and provide students with tutoring and instant feedback on assignments.

Although AI initiatives at the district level target mostly middle- and high-school students, adults are also bringing the technology to the classrooms of younger children. This past year, Iowa made an AI-powered reading tutor available to all state elementary schools; elsewhere, chatbots are filling in for school-counselor shortages.

Read: The Gen Z lifestyle subsidyMany schools still have bans on AI tools. A recent study on how kids are using AI in 20 states across the South and Midwest found that rural and lower-income students were least likely to say their schools permit AI use. The Houston Independent School District (HISD) offers one case study in what can go wrong when AI enters the classroom.

This past school year, the district’s curricula were seemingly tainted with AI slop, according to parents. In February, eighth graders viewed a slideshow depicting AI-generated art mimicking the style of the Harlem Renaissance. According to an op-ed in the Houston Chronicle written by two HISD parents, students were also given error-laden worksheets (one, on transportation technology, depicted a mix between a car and a chariot that was pulled by a horse with three back legs) and inscrutable discussion questions (“What is the exclamation point(s) to something that surprised you,” one asked).

An HISD spokesperson told me that the Harlem Renaissance images were indeed AI-generated using Canva, a graphic-design tool; he was unable to confirm whether AI was used in the other examples.None of this is slowing AI’s rollout in schools. This spring, President Donald Trump signed an executive order promoting AI use in the classroom with the goal of training teachers to integrate “AI into all subject areas” so that kids gain an expertise in AI “from an early age.

” The White House’s push to incorporate AI in K–12 education has repeatedly emphasized public-private partnerships, a call that tech companies already appear to be embracing. Last month, Microsoft pledged to give more than $4 billion toward advancing AI education across K–12 schools, community and technical colleges, and nonprofits.

The same week as Microsoft’s announcement, the American Federation of Teachers, one of the country’s largest teachers unions, announced a $23 million partnership with Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic. One of the partnership’s first efforts is a “National Academy for AI Instruction,” opening in New York City this fall, where instructors will learn how to use AI for generating lesson plans and other tasks.

The program then plans to expand nationally to reach 10 percent of U.S. teachers over the next five years.Schools are stuck in a really confusing place. Everyone seems to agree that education needs an upgrade for the AI era. “Our students right now are going to be put at a disadvantage internationally if we don’t evolve,” Miguel Cardona, Joe Biden’s education secretary, told me.

But no one seems to agree on what those changes should look like. Since ChatGPT’s release, the in-class essay, the oral exam, blue-book exams, and even cursive have all made something of a comeback in certain classrooms, in an effort to prevent students from outsourcing all their writing and thinking to AI.

At the same time, AI aims to make work more efficient—which is exactly what students are using it for. In that sense, whether kids using AI on their homework counts as cheating is “almost a semantic issue,” argues Alex Kotran, a co-founder of the AI Education Project, a nonprofit focused on AI literacy.

Of course, try telling that to a concerned parent.As Kotran points out, a middle ground exists between pretending students aren’t using AI and encouraging them to rely on it nonstop. “Even if you believe that everybody is going to be using AI in the future,” he told me, “it doesn’t necessarily follow that the top priority should be getting students hands-on right away.

” Imagine if in 2007, schools had decided that the best way to prepare kids for the future was to force every student to spend all day in front of an iPhone. No matter what teachers’, students’, and parents’ attitudes about AI in the classroom are, though, it’s a reality they have to deal with. The path that schools take from here has direct implications for the future of AI more generally.

The more reliant kids are on the technology now, the larger a role AI will play in their lives later. Once schools go all in, there’s no turning back.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts