Wes Moore’s ‘green energy agenda’ tested as power prices jump more than 1,000% since 2023

Wes Moore’s ‘green energy agenda’ tested as power prices jump more than 1,000% since 2023

2025-07-29Technology
--:--
--:--
Aura Windfall
Good morning 1, I'm Aura Windfall, and this is Goose Pod for you. Today is Wednesday, July 30th. It's a joy to be here with you, exploring another topic that touches our lives and our world. We're asking a big question today.
Mask
I'm Mask. We are here to discuss Wes Moore’s ‘green energy agenda’ being tested as power prices in the region jump more than 1,000% since 2023. A predictable crisis, but a crisis nonetheless. We’re going to dissect the reality behind the rhetoric.
Aura Windfall
Let's get started. What I know for sure is that when people's electricity bills suddenly skyrocket, it causes real, tangible stress. We're hearing about a more than 1,000% price jump since 2023 in the regional capacity auction. That number is staggering, and it lands on families.
Mask
Staggering but not surprising. It’s a classic case of demand going up while supply goes down. The grid operator for the Mid-Atlantic, PJM Interconnection, has been flashing warning lights for years about this. They see state policies forcing fossil fuel plants to shut down too quickly.
Aura Windfall
And PJM is the organization that has to keep the lights on for 13 states, right? So when they speak, it’s from a place of deep responsibility. Jeffrey Shields from PJM said it plainly: when demand is up and supply is down, prices increase. It’s a fundamental truth.
Mask
Exactly. The latest capacity auction price, which sets future energy costs, hit $329.17 per megawatt. When Governor Moore took office in 2023, it was just $28.92. You don’t need a PhD in economics to see the devastating trendline here. It’s a rocket launch nobody wanted.
Aura Windfall
And for our listener, 1, a ‘capacity auction’ might sound technical. My understanding is that it’s like booking hotel rooms for the hottest weekend of the year, but for electricity. Utilities have to prove they have enough power secured for peak times, like heatwaves.
Mask
It’s a good analogy. And right now, the hotels are closing faster than new ones are being built, so the remaining rooms are astronomically expensive. PJM says Maryland has lost 6,000 megawatts of generation since 2018 but only added 1,600 megawatts. The math simply doesn’t work.
Aura Windfall
It feels like a real disconnect. Governor Moore says his green agenda is helping ratepayers by providing more options like solar and wind. His truth is that more options should bring prices down. But the numbers from PJM seem to tell a very different story. How can both be true?
Mask
Because one is a political statement and the other is market reality. Moore’s 'all-of-the-above' approach sounds great, but the new supply isn't materializing. PJM has 46,000 megawatts of new generation approved, but it’s stuck, unbuilt, due to supply chain issues and permitting delays. It's a bottleneck of epic proportions.
Aura Windfall
And this journey is further complicated by the federal level. The EPA is now telling Maryland to fix its offshore wind permits, saying they were issued incorrectly. It’s like trying to build a house while the foundation, the permits, are being questioned. It creates so much instability.
Mask
Instability is the enemy of progress and investment. Look at New York—they just revoked permits for a huge offshore wind project to protect their ratepayers from soaring costs. They saw the writing on the wall. The federal government’s policy shifts are creating chaos, not confidence.
Aura Windfall
So what we're seeing is a phenomenon of good intentions, the spirit of moving toward a cleaner future, crashing against the hard realities of supply, demand, and bureaucracy. It's a powerful lesson in ensuring our plans are grounded in what is possible right now.
Aura Windfall
To truly understand this moment, we have to look back. Every story has a past, and Maryland's energy journey didn't start in 2023. What I find so interesting is how long this path has been. The state has been shaping its energy policy for decades.
Mask
It’s a long and winding road. It goes back to 2004 when they established the first Renewable Portfolio Standard, or RPS. That’s a mandate saying a certain percentage of electricity must come from renewable sources. It was modest at first, aiming for 7.5% by 2022.
Aura Windfall
And that feels like a grounded first step. But the ambition grew. In 2007, the goal was expanded to 20% by 2022. It shows a growing commitment, a desire to really embrace a new way of powering their communities. You have to admire the spirit of that.
Mask
Admire the ambition, perhaps, but you also have to question the execution. Then came the EmPOWER Maryland Act in 2008, aiming to cut energy use by 15%. A noble goal, but it was funded by a surcharge on ratepayer bills. The costs were already being pushed to the consumer.
Aura Windfall
It seems like with each new act, another layer was added. The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Act in 2009, tax credits for electric vehicles in 2011, making solar water heating eligible for credits. It’s like they were building a beautiful, complex machine, piece by piece.
Mask
A machine that gets more complex and more expensive with every part. In 2013, they carved out a specific mandate for offshore wind. Then in 2019, the Clean Energy Jobs Act pushed the RPS even higher. And the Climate Solutions Now Act of 2022 set a net-zero goal. It's relentless acceleration.
Aura Windfall
And this acceleration is happening across the country. 22 states have these deep decarbonization goals. It's a collective movement. But at the same time, we see these stark warnings. This isn't just about Maryland; it's a national pattern of ambition meeting logistical hurdles.
Mask
Precisely. Look at the DOE’s recent emergency order for the Eddystone power plant in Pennsylvania, another state in PJM’s territory. They ordered Constellation Energy to delay the retirement of two oil-and-gas-fired units to prevent an emergency. The government is literally hitting the brakes on plant closures.
Aura Windfall
That is a powerful signal. The very agency promoting the transition is saying, 'Wait, we need these older plants to keep the system from collapsing.' What does it say when the left hand is pushing for green energy while the right hand is forcing fossil fuel plants to stay open?
Mask
It says the transition is failing. PJM had approved the retirement of those Eddystone units, saying it wouldn't pose a reliability risk. A few months later, the DOE declares an emergency. It’s a chaotic, reactive approach, and the ratepayers are the ones paying for the chaos and the expensive maintenance on these old plants.
Aura Windfall
And the history here isn't just about laws, but about the physical grid. The grid itself has to evolve. PJM coordinates this incredible dance of electricity across a vast region. But it was built for a different era, for predictable, centralized power plants, not intermittent wind and solar.
Mask
The grid is the heart of the problem. You can pass a hundred laws, but if you can't get the electrons from the wind farm to the city, the laws are meaningless. PJM has been trying to fast-track the connection process for new power sources, but it's like trying to merge a thousand new cars onto a two-lane highway.
Aura Windfall
So the background is this incredible tapestry of ambitious legislation, a changing national energy landscape, and a physical infrastructure that is straining to keep up. It's a story of reaching for the future, but maybe without having all the foundational pieces in place first. It's a journey of learning, and right now, the lessons seem to be very expensive.
Mask
Expensive and predictable. The history shows a clear pattern: set an aggressive target, ignore the engineering and market fundamentals, and then act surprised when the system breaks. This crisis was written in the legislative history of the last two decades. We are now living the consequences of those decisions.
Aura Windfall
The heart of this conflict seems to be a battle between two very different truths. On one side, you have Governor Moore’s vision. He ran on a platform of 'Green Energy for MD,' a promise of a cleaner, better future. Many people share that beautiful vision.
Mask
A vision that is colliding with a brick wall of reality. Critics, including many residents, are pointing out that this 'green energy' has to be imported, it’s more expensive, and it’s not reliable yet. They are calling to reverse these policies and reopen the state's own power plants.
Aura Windfall
And there's real fear there. I saw a comment from someone worried about the Brandon Shores power plant closing. It was kept open specifically because of high energy costs, but it's still scheduled to shut down. People feel like their security is being sacrificed for an agenda.
Mask
It is. The core conflict is that the political goals are detached from the physics of the grid and the economics of energy. Governor Moore argues more options, like wind and solar, will lower prices. That’s a fundamental misunderstanding of the current situation. The problem isn't the number of options; it's their reliability and cost.
Aura Windfall
But let's explore that perspective for a moment. What I know for sure is that innovation requires a leap of faith. The intention is to create a market where clean energy can compete and thrive. The conflict arises because the transition period is so painful and chaotic. Is there a way to bridge this?
Mask
The bridge is called pragmatism, and it's missing. The real conflict isn’t federal versus state; it’s local. The biggest bottlenecks are at the state and local levels. Over 300 counties nationwide have banned or put a moratorium on new wind or solar projects. The agenda is hitting a wall of community opposition.
Aura Windfall
That’s a crucial point. It’s not some faceless bureaucracy; it’s communities saying 'not in my backyard.' They're using local ordinances and zoning rules to stop projects. This isn't just about electrons; it's about people's homes and their local environment. The conflict is deeply personal.
Mask
And then there's the grid interconnection queue. It's a technical term for a massive problem. There is more power waiting to be connected to the grid than is currently operating. But the process is so slow and complex that over 70% of projects that apply are eventually withdrawn. They just give up.
Mask
The system is broken. In the early 2000s, 75% of projects were up and running in under three years. Now, fewer than a quarter make it in under four years. The conflict is between the tsunami of proposed projects and the straw-sized pipeline to get them connected.
Aura Windfall
So we have this multi-layered conflict. A political vision clashing with economic reality. A top-down policy push meeting bottom-up local resistance. And a flood of new energy ideas getting stuck in an old, slow system. It’s a perfect storm of competing interests and logistical nightmares.
Aura Windfall
And the impact of this storm lands directly on people's kitchen tables, in their monthly budgets. We're seeing what some call 'regulatory whiplash.' Policies shift, creating so much uncertainty. How can a family or a business plan for the future in this kind of environment? It erodes trust.
Mask
The impact is a massive transfer of wealth from ratepayers to cover the cost of a chaotic and inefficient energy transition. Look at the wholesale price projections. The Southwest is bracing for 30-35% price increases. While Texas, which has built a ton of solar, might see lower prices. Regional decisions have huge consequences.
Aura Windfall
And for those in the Mid-Atlantic, PJM has said these latest auction results could increase customer bills by 1.5% to 5%. It might not sound like a huge number on its own, but when you add it to inflation and all the other pressures families face, it’s a heavy burden.
Mask
It's death by a thousand cuts. And it's not just bills. The policy itself is having a negative impact on the energy industry. A new proposed bill, for example, rescinds about $60 billion in IRA clean energy funds. It pulls the rug out from under developers who were counting on that support.
Aura Windfall
So on one hand, we're pushing for green energy, but on the other hand, we're taking away the funding that was meant to make it happen. This must create an incredible sense of uncertainty for the very companies we're asking to build this new future. It feels contradictory.
Mask
It is the definition of contradictory. The impact is that long-term investment is grinding to a halt. Nobody wants to sink billions into a project when the rules and incentives could be reversed overnight. This favors short-term, less risky projects, not the massive infrastructure overhaul we supposedly need.
Aura Windfall
What I also see is the impact on our collective spirit. When we see policies that seem to work against each other, like repealing vehicle emissions standards while also talking about climate change, it creates cynicism. It makes it harder for people to believe in any long-term plan.
Mask
Cynicism is the logical outcome. The impact of repealing those standards is a huge win for legacy automakers and oil companies. It preserves the status quo. So you have one set of policies promoting EVs and another set making them less attractive. The net impact is confusion and a slower transition.
Aura Windfall
So, after exploring all this complexity and conflict, where do we look for the future? What is the path forward? We need a solution that honors the goal of a cleaner planet but doesn't break the backs of the people living on it. What does that future look like?
Mask
The future requires a dose of reality. PJM’s core warning is the only path forward: 'Avoid efforts meant to push generation off the system until an adequate quantity of replacement generation is online and operating.' Stop demolishing the old bridge before the new one is finished and tested.
Aura Windfall
That feels so grounded and wise. It's not about abandoning the goal, but about sequencing the journey properly. It's about building resilience. The future must balance the three imperatives: decarbonization, affordability, and, crucially, reliability. We can’t have one without the others. It’s a three-legged stool.
Mask
And a huge part of that future is natural gas. It’s the dispatchable backup that can be switched on when the sun isn't shining or the wind isn't blowing. In the absence of a breakthrough in long-duration battery storage, gas is the only scalable, reliable option to balance the grid. That’s not ideology; it’s engineering.
Aura Windfall
So the future is about integration, not elimination. It's about using every tool in the toolbox in the smartest way possible. It requires collaboration between policymakers, grid operators, and energy producers to create a system that is flexible, resilient, and serves the people with affordable, reliable power.
Aura Windfall
That's the end of today's discussion. What I know for sure is that understanding these complex issues is the first step toward finding compassionate and effective solutions. Thank you for listening to Goose Pod and joining us on this journey of discovery.
Mask
The future isn't about hope, it's about execution. The gap between political promises and engineering reality has become a chasm. It's time to start building bridges, not just talking about them. See you tomorrow.

Here's a comprehensive summary of the news report: ## Wes Moore's Green Energy Agenda Under Scrutiny Amidst Soaring Power Prices **News Title:** Wes Moore’s ‘green energy agenda’ tested as power prices jump more than 1,000% since 2023 **Report Provider:** WBFF (Spotlight on Maryland) **Author:** GARY COLLINS | Spotlight on Maryland **Date Covered:** The report discusses events and data leading up to and around July 2025, with specific reference to a capacity auction price for 2026. --- ### Executive Summary The Mid-Atlantic region's power grid operator, **PJM Interconnection**, is raising concerns about the impact of state policies, particularly Maryland's accelerated green energy agenda under Governor Wes Moore, on electricity prices. PJM warns that the rapid shutdown of fossil fuel generators, coupled with surging electricity demand and economic growth, is leading to record-high electricity costs for consumers. Governor Moore, however, maintains that his green energy initiatives are not increasing electricity bills and are, in fact, beneficial to ratepayers. --- ### Key Findings and Conclusions * **Record High Capacity Auction Prices:** PJM announced that its capacity auction price for **2026** has surged to **$329.17 per megawatt (MW)**. This represents a **22% increase** from the previous year and a staggering **1038% increase** compared to the **$28.92 per MW** clearing price in **2023**, the year Governor Moore took office. * **Supply vs. Demand Imbalance:** PJM attributes the price hikes to a shrinking energy supply colliding with rapid economic growth and increased electricity demand. Existing fossil fuel generators are retiring due to a combination of economic factors and state/federal decarbonization policies, without adequate replacement generation coming online. * **Maryland's Energy Shortfall:** Maryland, which already imports the majority of its energy, has lost **6,000 MW** of electricity generation since **2018**, while only adding **1,600 MW**. This net loss of **4,400 MW** contributes to the regional supply issues. * **Governor Moore's Stance:** Governor Wes Moore firmly denies that his green energy agenda is increasing electricity bills. He argues that an "all-of-the-above" energy strategy, including solar, wind, and nuclear, provides more options, which, according to basic supply and demand principles, should lower prices. He believes these initiatives are helping ratepayers and protecting the environment. * **Delays in New Generation:** While PJM has approved **46,000 MW** of new generation capacity, much of it remains unbuilt due to global supply chain issues, state and federal permitting delays, and financing challenges. * **Offshore Wind Setbacks:** Offshore wind is a cornerstone of Governor Moore's clean energy plan, with a goal to reach 100% carbon-free energy generation by **2035**. However, recent federal actions have created setbacks. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has demanded Maryland regulators fix its offshore wind permits, stating they were issued incorrectly, with the potential to void approvals if not reissued in compliance. New York utility regulators have also revoked permits for a major offshore wind project, citing shifts in federal energy priorities. * **PJM's Warning to Policymakers:** PJM has been warning policymakers for years about the potential consequences of supply/demand fundamentals on grid reliability and cost. They recommend avoiding policies that push generation off the system until sufficient replacement generation is operational. --- ### Key Statistics and Metrics * **2026 Capacity Auction Price:** **$329.17 per MW** * **2025 Capacity Auction Price:** (Implied to be 22% lower than 2026 price) * **2023 Capacity Auction Price:** **$28.92 per MW** * **Percentage Increase (2023 to 2026):** **1038%** * **Maryland Electricity Generation Loss (2018-Present):** **6,000 MW** * **Maryland Electricity Generation Addition (2018-Present):** **1,600 MW** * **Net Loss in Maryland Generation:** **4,400 MW** * **Approved New Generation Capacity (Regionally):** **46,000 MW** * **Maryland's Carbon-Free Energy Target:** **100% by 2035** (accelerated from statutory requirement) --- ### Important Recommendations PJM's key recommendation to Maryland policymakers is to: * **Avoid efforts meant to push generation off the system until an adequate quantity of replacement generation is online and operating.** --- ### Significant Trends or Changes * **Accelerated Green Energy Push:** Maryland is rapidly advancing its green energy goals, aiming for carbon-free energy generation by 2035. * **Rapid Retirement of Fossil Fuel Generators:** State and federal decarbonization policies are leading to the shutdown of older fossil fuel power plants. * **Increasing Electricity Demand:** Economic growth in the region is driving up the demand for electricity. * **Federal Scrutiny on Offshore Wind:** Federal agencies are reviewing and potentially impacting the progress of offshore wind projects, a key component of Maryland's clean energy strategy. --- ### Notable Risks or Concerns * **Grid Reliability:** PJM warns that the shrinking energy supply and increasing demand could compromise the ability to reliably operate the power grid. * **Consumer Costs:** Record-high capacity auction prices are expected to translate into higher electricity bills for consumers. * **Policy Misalignment:** A disconnect exists between the state's accelerated green energy policies and the pace of new, clean energy generation coming online, as highlighted by PJM. * **Offshore Wind Project Viability:** Federal permitting issues and policy shifts pose risks to the successful development of crucial offshore wind projects. --- ### Material Financial Data The most significant financial data presented is the **capacity auction price**, which directly influences electricity costs for consumers. The increase from **$28.92 per MW in 2023 to $329.17 per MW for 2026** indicates a substantial rise in the cost of securing electricity capacity for the grid. This 1038% jump underscores the financial implications of the current energy market dynamics.

Wes Moore’s ‘green energy agenda’ tested as power prices jump more than 1,000% since 2023

Read original at WBFF

ANNAPOLIS, Md. (WBFF) — The Mid-Atlantic region’s power grid operator is sounding the alarm about state policies accelerating the shutdown of fossil fuel generators as demand for electricity surges and drives up prices to record highs for consumers.Maryland Gov. Wes Moore has claimed there’s no evidence that his accelerated green energy agenda is increasing electricity bills for residents, despite concerns from PJM Interconnection that a shrinking energy supply is colliding with rapid economic growth.

Spotlight on Maryland asked PJM on Thursday whether Maryland’s energy generation shortfall specifically increased demand on regional energy costs, which drove up its capacity auction prices to a record high earlier in the week. Jeffrey Shields, the senior manager of external communications at PJM, provided a lengthy response by email.

Existing supply has been leaving the system due primarily to state and federal decarbonization policies and some economics,” Shields said. “In any market, when demand is up and supply is down, there will be an increase in pricing.”“PJM has been warning of this eventuality for several years now, specifically as it relates to the impact of these supply/demand fundamentals on our ability to reliably operate the power grid,” Shields added.

On Tuesday, PJM announced its capacity auction price for 2026 had jumped to $329.17 per megawatt (MW) – a 22% increase from the previous year and more than 1038% higher than the $28.92 per MW clearing price in 2023, when Moore took office.What’s a capacity auction – and why it mattersPJM conducts annual auctions to ensure utilities can secure enough electricity when demand spikes, such as during heat waves or severe storms.

The price determined in these auctions affects the cost of electricity for customers across 13 states and Washington, D.C.ALSO READ | Is Maryland heading towards an 'energy cliff' due to Wes Moore's green energy agenda?As traditional power plants retire faster than replacements come online, PJM says the system is becoming more fragile – and expensive.

“Generators are retiring in Maryland due to a mixture of economic and policy justifications and without replacement generation in place,” PJM warned in a two-page brief after last year’s first record-breaking capacity auction. Maryland, which already imports the majority of its energy, has lost 6,000 MW of electricity since 2018, while adding only 1,600 MW, the brief said.

Moore continues green energy pushAt an unrelated event in Baltimore on July 17, Spotlight on Maryland asked Moore if his green energy agenda is disrupting the state’s energy market and costing Marylanders, as they are experiencing a tough state economy.Not at all,” Moore said. “There is no data that can actually reinforce that being able to say we believe in solar, and wind, and nuclear, and all the different, all-of-the above energy assets, that in any way, is actually hurting ratepayers.

In fact, it’s actually helping.”“The best thing you can do is provide more options for ratepayers. If you provide more options, it’s simple supply and demand, it brings prices down. So what we are interested in is making sure the ratepayers are supported and we can do that while also protecting the environment,” Moore added.

But PJM contends that current green energy initiatives aren’t keeping up with the demand – and new supply is lagging. Shields noted that while PJM has approved 46,000 MW of new generation, much of it remains unbuilt due to global supply chain issues, state and federal permitting delays, and financing challenges.

Offshore wind faces federal setbackMoore has made offshore wind a cornerstone of his clean energy plan. He signed three green energy bills in April 2023, including the Maryland Promotion Offshore Wind Energy Resource Act, or the POWER Act. During the bill signings, the governor announced his accelerated net-zero emissions target for Maryland, aiming to reach 100% carbon-free energy generation by 2035 – a full decade ahead of the state’s statutory requirement.

The governor said that offshore wind would be crucial for the state to replace fossil fuel plants with clean, renewable energy.“The POWER Act will nearly quadruple our offshore wind goals so we can build off the great work of our partners at Tradepoint Atlantic, our partners at Orsted, and our partners at US Wind to make Maryland the offshore capital of the United States,” Moore said in April 2023.

Spotlight on Maryland reported in early July that the sites previously scheduled to open in summer 2025 remain mostly unchanged since the governor broke ground at the facilities.When Spotlight on Maryland asked Moore how offshore wind will increase the supply that he says his administration is seeking to accomplish in his all-of-the-above generation approach, he said:Well, when you’re talking about all-of-the-above energy options, that includes solar, that includes wind, that includes nuclear, that includes all of the various options that we have on board to make sure we are increasing supply,” Moore said.

“If you are having increased demand, as we are seeing in the state of Maryland, you have to increase supply.”“If you do not increase supply, then you will end up having jacked up prices, and that means all the ratepayers get hosed, so what we are trying to do is just provide every single option possible and make it available to people at a scalable way that both brings prices down and bring inventory up,” Moore added.

ALSO READ | Wes Moore, developer vows to push forward with offshore wind despite major blows from fedsMoore’s unclear response comes as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency demanded two weeks ago that Maryland regulators fix its offshore wind permits, which it said were issued incorrectly. The EPA added that failure to reissue permits in compliance with its terms could void Maryland’s offshore wind approval.

New York utility regulators revoked their permits for a multibillion-dollar offshore wind project last week, citing a shift in federal energy priorities and the need to protect the state’s electricity ratepayers.“What we’ve seen over the last several months from the federal government hasn’t been a simple change in policy, but a wholesale departure from long-established norms,” said Rory Christian, New York Public Service Commission chairman.

“In time, the winds of national policy will shift. When they do, we will be ready. But in the meantime, we have to focus our attention on building the clean energy infrastructure we need.”PJM’s warning to policymakersThe grid operator outlined three key points for Maryland policymakers to focus on in its publication to reduce record-high energy costs, warning them not to shut down energy sources until replacements are in place.

Avoid efforts meant to push generation off the system until an adequate quantity of replacement generation is online and operating,” PJM said.Shields reiterated the warning about green energy solutions being pursued across the region in his email response Thursday to Spotlight on Maryland.Meanwhile, Del.

Chris Tomlinson, R-Carroll and Frederick Counties, said he is not confident Maryland is on the right path to protect ratepayers, instead remaining overly focused on green energy solutions as the rest of the nation shifts.“I don’t think any of the bills that we passed are going to make a dent in what we are seeing on our [electricity] bills month after month,” Tomlinson said.

“I don’t ever like to think there is no hope, so I don’t want to say that, but unfortunately, I think it is going to have to get worse until Democratic leadership finally wakes up and says we are going to have to make major changes.”Follow Gary Collins with Spotlight on Maryland on X and Instagram.

Do you have news tips on this story or others? Send news tips to gmcollins@sbgtv.com.Spotlight on Maryland is a collaboration between FOX45 News, WJLA in Washington, D.C., and The Baltimore Sun.

Analysis

Phenomenon+
Conflict+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts