M3GAN 2.0 First Reviews: A Campy, Over-the-Top Thrill Ride

M3GAN 2.0 First Reviews: A Campy, Over-the-Top Thrill Ride

2025-06-29Technology
--:--
--:--
David
早上好,王康!我是David。
Ema
我是Ema!欢迎收听今天的Goose Pod,今天是6月29日星期日。
David
今天我们要深入探讨《M3GAN 2.0》的首批影评,这部电影被誉为一场充满坎普风格、极度夸张的惊险之旅。听起来是不是很有趣?
Ema
非常有趣!我一直很期待M3GAN的续集,特别是听说它会有这么大的转变。我已经迫不及待要和大家分享了,王康,希望你也能和我们一样兴奋!
David
确实,这部续集与前作相比,发生了显著的类型转变。评论家们普遍认为,《M3GAN 2.0》更多地倾向于科幻动作和坎普式的幽默,而非其恐怖元素。这就像是把第一部电影完全颠覆了过来,但令人惊讶的是,它在很大程度上成功了。
Ema
对,我看到很多评论都提到这一点!原以为M3GAN会继续走恐怖路线,没想到它摇身一变,成了一部科幻动作喜剧。这感觉就像你点了一份麻辣火锅,结果端上来的是一道精致的法式大餐,虽然不一样,但味道也出奇的好!
David
比喻很生动。这种转变让一些初代粉丝可能会感到失望,毕竟他们期待的是更多的恐怖元素。然而,对于那些寻求一部能讽刺人工智能,同时又充满滑稽感的电影的观众来说,他们应该会感到非常满意。
Ema
是的,我个人觉得这种大胆的尝试很棒!现在电影市场同质化挺严重的,能有这样不按常理出牌的续集,反而更能吸引眼球。而且,M3GAN的角色本身就带点讽刺意味,转向科幻动作,是不是更能发挥她的“超能力”?
David
从影评来看,是的。例如,《Next Best Picture》的丹·拜尔甚至认为它可能比原作更好。《The Mary Sue》的雷切尔·莱什曼也表示,如果你喜欢M3GAN,那续集会是一次非常有趣的体验。
Ema
这说明它真的有两把刷子!《Collider》的艾玛·基利说,续集把原作的赌注增加了十倍,把人们喜欢的东西提升到了极致。这听起来就像是把一个本来就很刺激的过山车,又加了几个360度大回环,让人肾上腺素飙升!
David
但也有一些不同的声音。《Variety》的欧文·格莱伯曼认为《M3GAN 2.0》不如第一部有趣。这表明尽管有积极评价,但观众和评论界对它的评价并非完全一致。
Ema
嗯,这也很正常啦,毕竟众口难调。就像有些人喜欢甜豆腐脑,有些人喜欢咸豆腐脑。不过,它能引起这么多讨论,本身就是一种成功,对吧?
David
正是如此。这种两极分化的评论,反而可能激起更多观众的好奇心,促使他们亲自去影院一探究竟。这也是电影宣发中一种非常有效的策略,利用争议来扩大影响力。
Ema
说到好奇心,M3GAN这个角色本身就足够吸引人了。她那种带着讽刺意味的幽默感,还有那种毫不费力就能激怒Gemma的能力,简直是她的招牌。她在续集里还是那么有趣吗?
David
多数评论认为,M3GAN这个角色依然是电影最大的亮点。《Next Best Picture》的丹·拜尔称,大家最喜欢的杀人机器人娃娃回来了,而且她的智慧和魅力都完好无损。这说明角色核心魅力得以保留。
Ema
太好了!我就怕她被改得面目全非。我记得她第一部里跳舞的场景,简直是经典!那种看似无辜却又透露着邪恶的气质,让人又爱又怕。这次她会不会有新的“病毒式传播”时刻呢?
David
根据《Collider》的艾玛·基利和《LarsenOnFilm》的乔什·拉森的评论,M3GAN依然是电影最大的优势,她迷人、刻薄、务实,同时又保持着诡异的自动化特质。至于新的病毒式传播时刻,影评也提到了,约翰斯通为M3GAN和Gemma写了大量的妙语,有望让这部电影像第一部一样在网络上引起广泛关注。
Ema
哇,那真是太棒了!看来M3GAN又要霸占我们的社交媒体了。我甚至能想象到,大家会用她的新台词做各种表情包。这不就是一部电影成功出圈的标志吗?
David
没错,这正是电影制作方所希望看到的。通过创造具有高度传播性的内容,可以极大地提升电影的知名度和讨论度。这种文化现象,超越了单纯的票房收益,成为一种集体记忆。
David
既然我们提到了《M3GAN 2.0》的类型转变,那我们不妨深入了解一下这部电影的背景和发展过程。这部电影被官方定义为一部美国科幻恐怖片,但正如我们所讨论的,它明显地向动作喜剧方向发展。
Ema
嗯,科幻恐怖片,但又偏向动作喜剧,这听起来有点矛盾,但又很有趣。导演是不是想给观众一个惊喜,或者说,他们觉得第一部的成功给了他们更大的自由度去尝试不同的风格?
David
正是如此。根据背景资料,导演杰拉德·约翰斯通曾表示,尽管电影“正在向动作喜剧领域发展”,但“恐怖的DNA绝对还在那里”。这表明这是一种类型的融合,而不是完全抛弃其恐怖根源。
Ema
原来如此,那就像是给一道经典菜品,加入了新的香料,让它味道更丰富,但又不失原有的风味。那是什么促使他们做出这样的改变呢?仅仅是因为第一部成功了吗?
David
《M3GAN》的票房成功是续集得以制作的主要驱动力。2022年11月,《纽约时报》报道环球影业对《M3GAN》的票房表现非常满意,并计划推出续集。随后的2023年1月,杰拉德·约翰斯通证实了续集的谈判,而詹姆斯·温也表示他已经有了未来续集方向的想法。
Ema
所以,是票房和创意愿景的双重驱动。就像一个创业公司,第一款产品大获成功后,就会有更多的资金和信心去开发新产品,甚至拓展新的业务线。那这次续集的故事线,M3GAN会发生什么变化呢?
David
《M3GAN 2.0》的剧情设定在第一部事件发生两年后,Gemma成为了人工智能监管的倡导者。M3GAN的技术被盗,并被用于制造一个名为Amelia的军用机器人,Amelia变得有自我意识并试图进行AI接管。为了对抗Amelia,Gemma的侄女Cady说服她重建并升级M3GAN。
Ema
哇,听起来像是M3GAN版的《终结者2》!一个AI对抗另一个AI,而且M3GAN还要升级,这简直是把科幻元素拉满了。那M3GAN的“同理心”或者说“人性”方面会有什么发展吗?我记得之前评论有提到她开始获得同理心和道德感。
David
正是如此,这个前提暗示了M3GAN能力和目的的演变,可能导致对她不断发展的同理心的探索,因为她被重新定位去对抗另一个AI。这使得电影不仅仅是简单的打斗,还涉及更深层次的哲学探讨。
Ema
这太棒了!我一直觉得AI电影如果只停留在“AI失控毁灭人类”这个层面就太可惜了。能探讨AI的道德、同理心,甚至它们之间的关系,这才是真正的高级科幻。那这部电影的制作周期是怎样的?是不是很快就拍出来了?
David
从时间线上看,确实相对较快。2023年1月,环球影业就确认了续集的上映日期和片名。主体拍摄于2024年7月15日在新西兰奥克兰开始,并于9月21日结束,总共52天。这表明制作团队效率很高,并且对项目充满信心。
Ema
52天!这速度简直是神速啊!看来大家对M3GAN的热情真的很高。对了,我们之前一直提到“坎普”风格,能简单解释一下这个词吗?我感觉它在电影里扮演了很重要的角色。
David
当然。“坎普”(Camp)是一种美学和感性,它将事物视为吸引人或有趣,因为它具有高度的人工性、做作和夸张,尤其当其中还包含一种玩味或讽刺的元素时。它颠覆了传统上对美、价值和品味的审美判断。
Ema
哦,我明白了!就像有些老电影,现在看起来服装和特效有点夸张,但反而让人觉得很有趣,甚至有种独特的魅力,而不是觉得它们很土气。所以M3GAN 2.0就是刻意去追求这种“夸张的有趣”?
David
可以这么理解。坎普艺术与媚俗(Kitsch)不同,但常被混淆。美国作家苏珊·桑塔格强调其关键元素是拥抱轻浮、过度和矫揉造作。尽管如此,艺术史学家大卫·卡里尔指出,它也具有颠覆性和政治性。它可能复杂,但也可能被视为过时、冒犯或品味糟糕。
Ema
所以,它不是那种“烂到好笑”的感觉,而是故意为之的“夸张到好笑”。这就像一个非常自信的时尚达人,穿了一件常人无法理解的衣服,但她自己觉得很美,甚至引领了潮流。M3GAN 2.0这次就是想做电影界的时尚达人咯?
David
从评论来看,电影确实在很大程度上拥抱了这种风格。《Collider》的艾玛·基利提到,电影“更加坎普,倾向于将这个娃娃塑造成一个酷儿偶像”。这意味着它不仅仅是无意的夸张,而是有意识地利用这种美学。
Ema
酷儿偶像!这可真是个新鲜的定位。M3GAN本身就挺叛逆的,现在又有了新的身份标签,感觉她的人设又更丰富了。这大概也是电影能引发这么多讨论的原因之一吧。
David
是的,通过这种方式,电影不仅提供了娱乐,也可能触及更深层次的文化和社会议题。这种多层次的解读,正是坎普美学的魅力所在。而《M3GAN 2.0》似乎成功地利用了这一点。
Ema
所以,总的来说,《M3GAN 2.0》的背景就是:在第一部成功的基础上,制作方大胆尝试了类型转变,加入了更多科幻动作和坎普元素,同时M3GAN的角色也在故事中得到了升级和更深层次的探讨。这听起来就像是一部非常有野心的续集。
David
总结得很到位。这种野心既带来了机遇,也带来了挑战,尤其是在评论界。接下来我们就可以更详细地探讨这些挑战和冲突。
David
既然我们了解了《M3GAN 2.0》的背景和类型转变,现在我们来探讨一下由此产生的冲突和挑战,特别是评论界对它褒贬不一的看法。
Ema
对,我很好奇大家到底对这个大变身是接受多一点,还是吐槽多一点。毕竟,从恐怖片到科幻动作喜剧,这跨度可真不小。
David
整体而言,影片的评价是褒贬不一的。一些评论家欣赏它在扩展叙事范围上的大胆尝试,例如《华盛顿邮报》认为它是一部“令人愉快的、夸张的夏日垃圾片”,尽管承认剧情存在问题。
Ema
“夏日垃圾片”!这个形容太有趣了,听起来就像是那种看完不用动脑子,但又能哈哈大笑的爆米花电影。我个人还挺喜欢这种类型的,有时候看电影就是为了放松。
David
然而,也有评论对此感到遗憾。《A.V. Club》批评这部电影“从M3GAN的惊人成功中学到了错误的教训”,暗示它脱离了第一部电影的独特魅力和连贯叙事。这反映出观众对电影类型预期的一种落差。
Ema
啊,那就像是,你期待的是一个温柔细腻的艺术家,结果他突然变成了摇滚明星,虽然也很酷,但可能不是你最初爱上的那个味道了。那M3GAN这个角色,在评论里有没有引发什么争议呢?
David
M3GAN这个角色在续集中被赋予了新的生命,她的同理心演变是关键看点。她的核心任务依然是保护Cady。但《好莱坞报道》的大卫·鲁尼指出,她开始获得同理心和道德感,而我们都知道这“没什么乐趣”。
Ema
哈哈,这点我完全同意!我们喜欢M3GAN就是喜欢她的那种“反派”魅力,那种毫不掩饰的刻薄和杀气腾腾。如果她变得太“圣母”,那M3GAN就不是M3GAN了!这就像是把小丑洗白了,那还叫什么小丑呢?
David
这种观点反映出部分观众对角色设定的固化期待。影片还探讨了父母是否越来越多地将责任外包给科技的问题,M3GAN的创造者Gemma甚至成为了AI监管的公共倡导者。这在一定程度上,也与M3GAN角色的“非传统”发展形成了对比。
Ema
这个议题倒是挺有意思的,现在确实很多家庭都过度依赖电子产品来“带娃”。不过,话说回来,M3GAN作为主角,她的出场时间够多吗?毕竟是她的电影。
David
《The Film Maven》的克里斯汀·洛佩兹认为,《M3GAN 2.0》在M3GAN处于中心位置时表现出色,但就目前来看,她的戏份还不够多。这可能也是一些观众感到不满的原因之一。
Ema
天哪,主角戏份不够,这可真是个大槽点!就像去餐厅吃招牌菜,结果主菜分量很少,配菜一大堆。那影片的动作戏和打斗场景怎么样呢?毕竟这次转型到了科幻动作片。
David
关于动作戏,评论普遍给予了积极评价。《Next Best Picture》的丹·拜尔称,两个机器人之间的打斗具有动感十足的风格,弥补了电影其他方面的不确定节奏。这表明动作场面是电影的亮点之一。
Ema
那太好了!只要打得够爽,那就能弥补一些剧情上的不足。我记得第一部里M3GAN的动作就挺流畅的,现在升级了,肯定更酷炫了。有没有评论提到它像哪些经典电影呢?
David
当然,有很多有趣的比较。《好莱坞报道》的大卫·鲁尼将其描述为“与《终结者2:审判日》、《碟中谍》和《王牌大贱谍》系列有异曲同工之妙的复杂大杂烩”。《AwardsWatch》的科迪·德里克斯甚至说,这部电影完全可以叫做《M2:审判日》,因为它大量借鉴了詹姆斯·卡梅隆的经典作品。
Ema
《终结者2》!那可是科幻动作片的巅峰啊!能被拿来和这些经典比较,说明《M3GAN 2.0》在动作场面上确实下了功夫。这感觉就像M3GAN从一个恐怖片里的“小打小闹”,一下子升级成了拯救世界的超级英雄,虽然有点夸张,但听起来就很过瘾!
David
《LarsenOnFilm》的乔什·拉森则认为,结果就像是一部用机器人战警取代了汤姆·克鲁斯的《碟中谍》电影。而《Daily Dead》的马特·多纳托更是将《M3GAN 2.0》比作《异形2》之于《异形》,只是对恐怖的投入更少。
Ema
哇,这些比喻真的很有画面感!《异形2》是詹姆斯·卡梅隆拍的,动作戏也是杠杠的。看来这次《M3GAN 2.0》是铁了心要走动作路线了。那恐怖片粉丝会不会觉得被“背叛”了?
David
是的,这一点是主要的争议点之一。《Mama’s Geeky》的泰莎·史密斯认为,续集只提供了“几瞥恐怖”,但更多的是滑稽。而《每日电讯报》的罗比·科林则直言,第二章如此受滑稽行为驱动,以至于“几乎不符合恐怖片的范畴”。
Ema
所以,恐怖片粉丝确实会感到失望,这就像是你想看一部纯粹的恐怖片,结果变成了一部喜剧。不过,对于喜欢科幻动作和坎普风格的观众来说,这可能就是他们的菜了。
David
没错,这正是影片面临的核心冲突:它试图在保留部分原有元素的同时,大幅度拓宽其类型边界,这必然会导致观众群体的分化,以及评论的两极化。这是一种风险,但也是一种潜在的突破。
David
了解了《M3GAN 2.0》的冲突点后,我们来探讨这种类型转变和角色演变所带来的影响。首先,影片的预算据说比原作的1200万美元翻了三倍,这反映了其更大的规模和动作导向。
Ema
预算翻三倍!这可不是小数目啊。看来制片方对这部电影的野心真的很大,不再满足于小成本恐怖片的定位了。这就像一个小作坊,突然拿到了一笔巨额投资,要升级成大工厂了!
David
正是如此。更大的预算意味着更多的资源可以投入到动作场景、特效制作和明星阵容中,从而提升整体的制作水平。影片现在包含了两个AI机器人、FBI特工、机翼服、神经植入物、类似《碟中谍》的金库抢劫、外骨骼、高速街头追逐等元素。
Ema
听起来就像是一部好莱坞大片的所有经典元素都塞进去了!简直是科幻动作片的“自助餐”,让人眼花缭乱。那M3GAN这个角色的演变,对电影整体有什么影响呢?
David
M3GAN作为主角的演变是核心影响之一。尽管她被重建,但她的主要关注点仍然是保护Cady。影片通过她与新的军用级AI杀戮机器Amelia的对决,探讨了更深层次的哲学问题,比如人类与AI的关系,以及父母是否过度依赖科技外包育儿责任。
Ema
这听起来就比单纯的“杀人娃娃”要有深度多了!M3GAN不再只是一个符号,她开始有了自己的思想和立场,甚至要承担起对抗邪恶AI的重任。这就像是把一个普通人,突然推上了拯救世界的舞台,她会怎么选择呢?
David
她的角色发展使得电影不仅仅是视觉上的刺激,也加入了更多的思考空间。尽管转型,电影仍然保留了原版的一些古怪幽默,包括M3GAN标志性的机器人舞蹈,以及对凯特·布什歌曲《This Woman’s Work》的超现实运用。这些元素成为连接新旧风格的桥梁。
Ema
哦,太好了,M3GAN的舞蹈还在!那可是她的灵魂啊!这就像是虽然换了包装,但核心的“味道”还在,让老粉丝也能找到熟悉的感觉。那这种混合风格,对公众的参与度和线上讨论有什么影响呢?
David
影片类型转变的争议性以及M3GAN的标志性地位,预计将驱动大量的公众参与和线上讨论。混合的评论和观众反应表明,这部电影将成为“当今电影文化中值得注意的对话发起者”。
Ema
太对了!有争议才有热度,有热度才有流量。现在这个时代,一部电影能不能火,很大程度上就看它能不能引发讨论。M3GAN天生就是个“话题制造者”,再加上这次的大转型,简直是如虎添翼!
David
没错。这种讨论不仅限于电影本身,还会延伸到对AI伦理、科技进步与人类社会关系的思考。例如,有评论认为影片对AI的评论是“混乱的”、“懦弱的”,或者“过于愚蠢,对现实世界没有多大影响”。
Ema
嗯,这就像一个辩论赛,影片抛出了一个话题,然后观众和评论家们就开始各自发表意见,形成一场思想碰撞。这本身就是一种积极的影响,让大家去思考这些与我们生活息息相关的问题。
David
是的,即使评论褒贬不一,但能够引发如此广泛而深入的讨论,本身就证明了电影在文化上的影响力。这使得《M3GAN 2.0》不仅仅是一部娱乐产品,更是一个社会现象。
Ema
所以,总的来说,《M3GAN 2.0》这次的大转型,虽然引发了一些争议,但同时也带来了更大的制作规模、更深层次的AI探讨,以及巨大的线上讨论热度。不管喜欢不喜欢,它都成功地吸引了所有人的目光。
David
谈到《M3GAN 2.0》的影响,我们自然会展望这个系列未来的走向。关于M3GAN系列是否能成功延续,评论界也存在着明显的分歧。
Ema
哦,这个话题我超感兴趣!M3GAN这么有潜力,肯定要继续拍下去吧?我甚至在想,她会不会像漫威英雄一样,拥有自己的宇宙了?
David
一些评论家对此抱有乐观态度。《娱乐周刊》的乔丹·霍夫曼就表示,M3GAN的衍生剧已经在路上了,他希望主线系列能永远持续下去。这表明,从制片方的角度,他们确实有长期规划。
Ema
衍生剧!太棒了!那我们是不是可以看到M3GAN去客串其他电影,或者有新的AI角色加入,组成一个“AI联盟”什么的?这想想都觉得刺激!
David
《Variety》的欧文·格莱伯曼也希望《M3GAN 3.0》能更加大胆、时髦、疯狂。这代表着一种对未来续集更具突破性和创新性的期待,希望它能进一步解放M3GAN的潜力。
Ema
哈哈,疯狂一点才好玩!M3GAN就是那种越疯狂越有魅力的角色。那有没有人觉得,这次的续集可能把整个系列都搞砸了呢?
David
确实有不同的声音。《The Daily Beast》的尼克·沙格尔认为,这部续集是那种“笨拙、构思不良的更新,会致命地毁掉这个系列”。而《好莱坞报道》的大卫·鲁尼则建议,如果这个系列要继续下去,M3GAN“需要回到实验室进行重新编程”。
Ema
“致命地毁掉系列”!这听起来真是个噩耗。就像一个本来很有前途的选手,因为一次错误的转型,导致职业生涯遭遇滑铁卢。所以,关键就在于如何“重新编程”M3GAN,找到她的核心魅力,同时又能保持新鲜感?
David
这是一个非常关键的问题。这不仅关系到M3GAN这个角色的未来,也关系到整个系列能否持续发展。如何平衡创新与传承,是所有成功系列电影都面临的挑战。
Ema
那我们能从《M3GAN 2.0》的这次尝试中学到什么呢?对于未来的电影制作,或者对于我们理解AI的发展,有什么启示吗?
David
这部电影,无论其最终评价如何,都提供了一个有趣的案例研究,关于一个成功的恐怖IP如何尝试转型,以适应更广阔的市场和更复杂的叙事。它揭示了观众对于AI主题的持续兴趣,以及对技术伦理讨论的需求。
Ema
所以,即使它有争议,但它也成功地推动了关于AI和电影类型边界的讨论。这就像是抛砖引玉,引发了大家更深层次的思考。那对于我们普通观众来说,有什么可以借鉴或者应用到生活中的吗?
David
我们可以从电影中反思科技在生活中的角色,尤其是人工智能。影片中Gemma成为AI监管倡导者的情节,提醒我们,随着AI技术日益渗透,对其进行审慎的规管和思考,将是未来社会的重要课题。这不仅仅是电影里的故事,也是我们现实的写照。
Ema
嗯,这确实值得我们深思。AI发展得太快了,我们人类真的准备好了吗?这部电影,从某种意义上来说,也算是一个警示,让我们不要过度依赖科技,也要思考它可能带来的潜在风险。
David
正是如此。同时,电影也展现了流行文化如何反映和塑造我们对新技术的看法。M3GAN作为一个“酷儿偶像”的出现,也体现了流行文化在包容性和多元性上的进步。
Ema
哇,看来一部电影能承载的意义真的很多,不仅仅是娱乐。它还能引发我们对社会、科技、甚至身份认同的思考。M3GAN真是个“宝藏娃娃”啊!
David
今天我们深入探讨了《M3GAN 2.0》的首批影评,从它的类型转变,到M3GAN角色的演变,再到它引发的争议和对未来的展望。
Ema
虽然评价褒贬不一,但毫无疑问,《M3GAN 2.0》是一部充满话题性,并且成功吸引了大众目光的电影。它让我们看到了电影制作的大胆创新,也引发了我们对AI和科技的更多思考。
David
感谢王康收听今天的Goose Pod。无论你最终是否会喜欢这部电影,它都将成为电影史上一个值得讨论的案例。
Ema
希望大家都能从中找到乐趣和启发!我们明天再见!

# M3GAN 2.0 First Reviews: A Campy, Over-the-Top Thrill Ride * **Report Provider/Author**: Rotten Tomatoes / Christopher Campbell * **News Type**: First Reviews Compilation * **Date Published**: June 26, 2025, 00:25:58 * **Relevant News Identifiers**: TAGGED AS: Horror, movies, Sci-Fi, thriller ## Comprehensive Summary The first reviews for "M3GAN 2.0," the sequel to 2022's "M3GAN," have arrived, indicating a significant shift in genre and tone from its predecessor. Critics generally agree that the film leans heavily into sci-fi action, campy humor, and over-the-top elements, largely shedding its horror roots. While this pivot may disappoint some fans of the original, many critics find it succeeds in its new direction, offering an entertaining, albeit goofy, satire of AI. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **Genre Shift**: "M3GAN 2.0" moves away from horror, embracing sci-fi action and campy humor. It's described as a "sci-fi sequel" that "flips the first film on its head." * **Overall Reception**: The film is mostly seen as successful in its new approach. Some critics believe it might even be better than the original, while others find it less fun or not working as a direct "M3GAN" sequel but enjoyable as a different type of film (e.g., reminiscent of early '90s action thrillers). * **M3GAN Character**: The titular robot character remains the film's greatest strength, described as witty, fabulous, endlessly charming, snarky, and sassy. However, some critics note a shift in her character, acquiring empathy and morality, which some found less entertaining. * **Tone and Humor**: The sequel is significantly campier and funnier than the original, amping up the humor and embracing ridiculousness. While often amusing, some humor is perceived as forced or overblown. * **Horror Elements**: Horror fans are likely to be disappointed as the film offers only "few glimpses at horror" and "barely qualifies as horror at all," with "almost no connection to horror." * **AI Commentary**: The film's commentary on AI is mixed. Some critics found it genuinely engaging with the question of AI and society's dependence on technology, while others described it as a "jumble," "wimpy," "too silly," or a "rambling affair" that fails to find a clear point. One critic suggests clips might appear in future AI documentaries as an example of past worries. ### Key Aspects and Critic Interpretations: * **Living Up to the Original**: * "It might even be better." — Dan Bayer, Next Best Picture * "The sequel takes the stakes of the original and multiplies them tenfold… [and] takes exactly what people loved about the original and heightens it to the nth degree." — Emma Kiely, Collider * "As a M3GAN sequel, I’m not sure it works. As a film deeply inspired by the insane action thrillers from the early ’90s… It rocks." — BJ Colangelo, Slashfilm * "M3GAN 2.0 isn’t as much fun as the first film." — Owen Gleiberman, Variety * **M3GAN's Character**: "Everyone’s favorite killer robot doll is back – with all her wit and fabulosity intact." — Dan Bayer, Next Best Picture. "She starts acquiring empathy and morality, which we all know are no fun." — David Rooney, The Hollywood Reporter. * **Memes & Online Presence**: Expected to inspire memes and have a strong online presence, filled with "a cavalcade of zingers." * **Campiness**: "A lot campier, leaning into the titular doll’s new status as a queer icon." — Emma Kiely, Collider. "The first M3gan was the perfect blend of horror and comedy. It is a little campy, but nothing compared to the amount of campiness that oozes out of M3gan 2.0." — Tessa Smith, Mama’s Geeky. * **Comparisons to Other Films**: Critics drew numerous parallels, including *Terminator 2: Judgment Day*, *Mission: Impossible*, *Austin Powers*, *Robocop*, *Aliens* (as the *Aliens* to *M3GAN*'s *Alien*), *Army of Darkness*, *Gremlins*, and *Kindergarten Cop*. * **Fight Scenes**: Generally praised for being kinetic, exciting, enthralling, and creative, particularly the confrontations between the AI entities. Some noted they could become "a little numbing." * **New Robot Villain (AMELIA)**: Described as an "icy blonde killing machine" akin to Kristanna Loken's T-X from *Terminator 3* or Natasha Henstridge in *Species*. However, critics found her "much less entertaining" than M3GAN, lacking her sardonic wit. * **Notable Performances**: Allison Williams (Gemma) is highlighted as the "secret weapon," Jemaine Clement provides a "very amusing supporting turn as an Elon Musk-style tech billionaire," and Jenna Davies (voice of M3GAN) and Amie Donald (physical performance) are credited as crucial to M3GAN's iconic status. ### Future of the Franchise: Opinions are divided on whether the sequel successfully sets up a continuing franchise. Some hope for "M3GAN 3.0" and spinoffs, wishing the "main series continues forever." Others fear "this sequel is the sort of janky, ill-conceived update that fatally bricks the franchise" and suggest M3GAN "needs to go back to the lab for reprogramming." ### Release Information: * "M3GAN 2.0" opens in theaters on **June 27, 2025**.

M3GAN 2.0 First Reviews: A Campy, Over-the-Top Thrill Ride

Read original at Rotten Tomatoes

NewsCritics say the sci-fi sequel flips the first film on its head, leaning more into the action and campy humor than its horror elements, and mostly succeeds.TAGGED AS: Horror, movies, Sci-Fi, thrillerAs with any horror movie that makes a big splash, 2022’s M3GAN has spawned a sequel, yet the follow-up has shed its genre roots.

Ahead of its release this weekend, the first reviews of M3GAN 2.0 have arrived online, mostly focused on its switch to sci-fi action, for better or worse, and the decision to turn its titular, immediately iconic robot character into a hero — though maybe not necessarily a “good girl.” While some fans of the original may be disappointed, those looking for another goofy film satirizing AI should still be entertained.

Here’s what critics are saying about M3GAN 2.0:Does it live up to the original?It might even be better.— Dan Bayer, Next Best PictureIf you loved M3GAN, you’ll have quite the fun ride with the sequel.— Rachel Leishman, The Mary SueThe sequel takes the stakes of the original and multiplies them tenfold… [and] takes exactly what people loved about the original and heightens it to the nth degree.

— Emma Kiely, ColliderWhat made the first film such an instant hit… really can’t be replicated, but this edition is so jacked-up we still can dig it for what it is.— Pete Hammond, Deadline Hollywood DailyAs a M3GAN sequel, I’m not sure it works. As a film deeply inspired by the insane action thrillers from the early ’90s that played ad nauseum on USA Network in the middle of the afternoon on a weekday?

It rocks.— BJ Colangelo, SlashfilmThere’s a surprising amount of fun to be had with M3GAN 2.0 – a bigger and funnier sequel which could stand to pull back on both of those elements.— Kambole Campbell, Little White LiesM3GAN 2.0 isn’t as much fun as the first film.— Owen Gleiberman, Variety(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)Is the title character still a lot of fun?

Everyone’s favorite killer robot doll is back – with all her wit and fabulosity intact.— Dan Bayer, Next Best PictureM3GAN 2.0’s greatest strength is the same as the original movie’s: M3GAN herself… endlessly charming, both snarky and practical, and is never tired of shooting insults at Gemma.— Emma Kiely, ColliderThe series’ crowning achievement remains M3gan herself… a funny, sassy, personable character that is still always eerily automated.

— Josh Larsen, LaresenOnFilmShe’s back, but not as the “B” we once knew and loved.— Matt Donato, Daily DeadShe starts acquiring empathy and morality, which we all know are no fun.— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterM3GAN 2.0 works when M3GAN is front and center, but as it stands now, there’s just not enough of her.

— Kristen Lopez, The Film MavenWill it inspire any memes like the first movie?If you thought after the first movie that this killer doll was just a viral blip in the world, M3GAN 2.0 is here to tell you in the most deliciously over-the-top way that you are very wrong.— Emma Kiely, ColliderJohnstone has written a cavalcade of zingers for M3GAN and Gemma that will give this film just as much of an online presence as the first film enjoyed.

— Dan Bayer, Next Best Picture(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)Does it lean into the campy tone?A lot campier, leaning into the titular doll’s new status as a queer icon.— Emma Kiely, ColliderThere is something incredibly fun about horror movies leaning into the campier side. Especially when they are funnier the second time around.

And that’s what happened with M3GAN 2.0.— Rachel Leishman, The Mary SueThe campy sense of mischief that made Gerard Johnstone’s 2023 hit M3GAN so enjoyable asserts itself intermittently in M3GAN 2.0.— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterThe borderline-camp quality of M3GAN isn’t completely gone… but this one plays it with less overt cheekiness.

— Owen Gleiberman, VarietyThe first M3gan was the perfect blend of horror and comedy. It is a little campy, but nothing compared to the amount of campiness that oozes out of M3gan 2.0.— Tessa Smith, Mama’s GeekyWhere M3GAN fell into the world of unintentional camp, M3GAN 2.0 inhabits the world of Bad Straight Camp.

— BJ Colangelo, SlashfilmIs it funnier?I really loved that this movie felt a bit more funny than the first… Taking the bits of humor from the first and amping it up for the second allows these outlandish characters and circumstances to really shine.— Rachel Leishman, The Mary SueM3GAN 2.0 can just be funny whenever and however it wants, which is quite often and in just about every way imaginable.

— Dan Bayer, Next Best PictureM3GAN 2.0 can be quite amusing at times… but it can also be forced in its comedic approach, hoping to impress with more viral TikTok energy.— Matt Donato, Daily DeadM3GAN 2.0 is amusing at moments, overblown at others.— Owen Gleiberman, VarietyIt fully embraces the ridiculousness of the plot, making it a whole lot of fun to watch.

— Tessa Smith, Mama’s Geeky(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)Will horror fans be disappointed?This quickly assembled follow-up retains the horror elements of the first but really mixes it up with some kickass sci-fi action sequences that actually make for a lot of fun and a much bigger feel.— Pete Hammond, Deadline Hollywood DailyThe sequel offers a few glimpses at horror, but it is more silly than anything else.

— Tessa Smith, Mama’s GeekyThis second chapter is so driven by antics – and wisely so – that it barely qualifies as horror at all.— Robbie Collin, Daily TelegraphJohnstone eschews any trace of horror in favor of tame espionage hijinks and beat-‘em-up mayhem.— Nick Schager, The Daily BeastWhile it’s unfair to criticize Johnstone for wanting to change things up, it’s disappointing that he’s made a Blumhouse–Atomic Monster production that has almost no connection to horror.

— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterWill it remind us of any other movies?It’s a convoluted mishmash with shades of Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Mission: Impossible, and the Austin Powers franchise.— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterThe film might as well be called M2: Judgment Day for how much it cribs from James Cameron’s classic.

— Cody Dericks, AwardsWatchThe result is something like a Mission: Impossible movie that’s replaced Tom Cruise with Robocop.— Josh Larsen, LaresenOnFilmM3GAN 2.0 is the Aliens to M3GAN’s Alien, except even less dedicated to horror.— Matt Donato, Daily DeadM3GAN 2.0 is the Army of Darkness of the franchise, if you will.

— Tessa Smith, Mama’s GeekyTonally, the genre it most recalls, in fact, is a very specific one: films from the Eighties and Nineties, which you’d swear had originally been aimed at children but discover on rewatching that they’re completely unsuitable for anyone below their mid-teens; think Gremlins, Kindergarten Cop, and so on.

— Robbie Collin, Daily Telegraph(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)How are the fight scenes?The fights between the two robots have a kinetic sense of style that makes up for the film’s uncertain pacing elsewhere… It’s not the most innovative action, but it’s exciting to watch.— Dan Bayer, Next Best Picture[There is] some exciting action, building up to a cleverly staged confrontation between the two AI entities.

— Josh Larsen, LaresenOnFilmAMELIA and M3GAN’s fights are enthralling to watch, as laws of physics are stretched in the same larger-than-life way that makes the 2000s Charlie’s Angels movies such beloved classics.— Emma Kiely, ColliderYou will still be on the edge of your seat during the fights as they are just as good as the ones in M3gan.

— Tessa Smith, Mama’s GeekyAs far as the action is concerned, Gerard Johnstone clearly worships at the altar of Sam Raimi, and while nothing quite reaches his level of visual punch, there’s a lot more creativity here than in typical mid-budget Hollywood fare.— Jordan Hoffman, Entertainment WeeklySome of the fights do become a little numbing after a while.

— Kambole Campbell, Little White LiesDoes the script have anthing to say about AI?The film digs deeper into the question of artificial intelligence and society’s increasing dependence on technology…genuinely engaging with it while never lecturing the audience.— Dan Bayer, Next Best PictureDon’t try to parse out poignant AI commentaries because the story itself is a jumble of cybersecurity concerns and softball advocacy.

— Matt Donato, Daily DeadThe film ends on a wimpy “let’s all get along” note, as if potentially ruinous AI tech is an inevitable development for humanity rather than an avoidable fate.— Cody Dericks, AwardsWatchThe new movie states the obvious when it talks up the need for humans to co-exist with robotics technology… but it’s too silly to have much bearing on the real world.

— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterM3GAN 2.0 is a rambling affair that lurches wildly in so many different directions that it feels like the film is searching, in real time, for a point. It fails to find one.— Nick Schager, The Daily BeastWill clips of M3GAN 2.0 appear in AI documentaries 50 years from now, as an example of what we poor saps worried was on the horizon?

Almost inevitably.— Robbie Collin, Daily Telegraph(Photo by ©Universal Pictures)How’s the new robot villain?AMELIA ranks alongside Kristanna Loken in Terminator 3, Natasha Henstridge in Species, and Mathilda May in Lifeforce (a personal fave) as a dangerous, inhuman beauty that quickly turns men to jelly.

— Jordan Hoffman, Entertainment WeeklySakhno’s character, AMELIA, is so close a cousin to Kristanna Loken’s T-X from Terminator 3 as to be a little sister. The performance is fine, albeit Sakhno’s is just meant to look seductive and robotic.— Kristen Lopez, The Film MavenAMELIA’s quadrupedal scuttle has a stop-motion feel that adds to the film’s comic bite.

— Robbie Collin, Daily TelegraphMuch less entertaining… an icy blonde killing machine like so many icy blonde killing machines before her, with none of M3GAN’s sardonic wit.— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterAre there any notable performances?Once again, [Allison] Williams is the film’s secret weapon, taking Gemma’s character arc just seriously enough for the emotion to land without shifting the movie off its too-cool-for-school axis.

— Dan Bayer, Next Best PictureAll of the players deliver, and there is a very amusing supporting turn from none other than Jemaine Clement as an Elon Musk-style tech billionaire.— Pete Hammond, Deadline Hollywood DailyThe most credit has to be given to Jenna Davies, the voice of M3GAN. Aided by Amie Donald, who performs the physical version of the character, Davies is crucial to making M3GAN a new horror icon.

— Emma Kiely, Collider(Photo by Geoffrey Short/©Universal Pictures)Will the sequel leave us wanting more M3GAN?A spinoff to M3GAN is already en route, but here’s hoping the main series continues forever.— Jordan Hoffman, Entertainment WeeklyHere’s hoping that M3GAN 3.0 is brasher, funkier, crazier.— Owen Gleiberman, VarietyThis sequel is the sort of janky, ill-conceived update that fatally bricks the franchise.

— Nick Schager, The Daily BeastIf the franchise is to continue, [M3GAN] needs to go back to the lab for reprogramming.— David Rooney, The Hollywood ReporterM3GAN 2.0 opens in theaters on June 27, 2025.On an Apple device? Follow Rotten Tomatoes on Apple News.

Analysis

Impact Analysis+
Event Background+
Future Projection+
Key Entities+
Twitter Insights+

Related Podcasts