Cars, coffee and clothing are poised to get pricier with new tariffs

Cars, coffee and clothing are poised to get pricier with new tariffs

2025-08-11Business
--:--
--:--
Aura Windfall
Good morning norristong_x, I'm Aura Windfall, and this is Goose Pod for you. Today is Monday, August 11th. It's a pleasure to be here, ready to explore what's moving the world and what it means for your spirit.
Mask
And I'm Mask. We're here to dissect the machinery of change. Today's topic: Cars, coffee, and clothing are poised to get pricier with new tariffs. Let’s get into the gears of it.
Aura Windfall
Let's get started. What I know for sure is that when policies shift in Washington, we feel the ripple effects right at our kitchen tables. We're hearing about the highest tariff levels since the Great Depression. It sounds so historic and a little unsettling.
Mask
Historic is one word for it. Necessary is another. The average U.S. tariff rate just hit 18.6%. This isn't a tentative move; it’s a permanent policy shift. Businesses that were waiting on the sidelines now have to act. The clock is ticking.
Aura Windfall
And when businesses act, it often means higher prices for us. I saw an estimate that this could cost the average household around $2,400 a year. That’s not just a number; that's a family’s vacation, or car repairs, or a significant part of their savings.
Mask
It's the cost of shaking up the status quo. Look at the specifics: leather shoes and bags could jump 39%, other clothing by 37%. Your morning coffee from Brazil? Hit with a 50% tariff. These aren't small adjustments; they are strategic shocks to the supply chain.
Aura Windfall
It feels like a storm is brewing. For so long, it seems companies were absorbing these costs, maybe using their existing stockpiles. But those reserves are running out. It’s like they’ve been holding their breath, and now they finally have to exhale.
Mask
Exactly. Major retailers like Costco and Target can't shield consumers forever. Their stockpiles are dwindling. Walmart is already marking up baby gear and toys. This isn't a drill. The era of companies eating the cost to protect their profit margins is over. It was never sustainable.
Aura Windfall
I think about small business owners, like the woman mentioned in the article, Sharon Azula, with her plush toy company. She’s facing a 30% increase on her inventory from China. Her question is so powerful: "If our $16 plush suddenly costs more than $20, are consumers still going to buy it?"
Mask
That’s the brutal reality of the marketplace. She has to adapt or perish. Either she finds a way to absorb the cost, which is unlikely, or she passes it on and risks losing customers. This is the pressure that forces innovation and reshoring of manufacturing. It’s painful, but it's productive.
Aura Windfall
But is it truly productive if it hollows out a business that was just finding its footing? The toy industry is a perfect example, importing over 75% of its products from China. Toy prices are already outpacing inflation. It’s a heavy burden for these businesses to carry.
Mask
The President’s goal is to combat unfair trade practices that have decimated American manufacturing. It’s about creating a "Golden Age" for domestic production. Moving manufacturing for something like toys isn't simple, I get that. China has the infrastructure, the expertise. You can't replicate that overnight.
Aura Windfall
No, you can't. And that's the heart of the matter. It feels like we're caught between a vision for the future and the very real, very challenging present. We’re seeing costs rise, but the infrastructure to support a different way of doing things isn't fully there yet.
Aura Windfall
To truly understand this moment, we have to look back. This isn't happening in a vacuum. The story of these tariffs began years ago, with a slow build-up of tension and policy shifts that have led us to this critical point today. It’s a journey we’ve all been on.
Mask
It started escalating in 2018. The administration imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum, citing national security. That was the first major shot across the bow. Then came the focus on China, with tariffs on billions of dollars worth of goods. It was a trade war, plain and simple.
Aura Windfall
And like any war, there were retaliations. Other countries didn't just accept it; they responded with their own tariffs on U.S. exports. It created this cycle of action and reaction that has now culminated in these broad, historically high rates we're seeing in 2025. It’s a powerful lesson in interconnectedness.
Mask
People throw around comparisons to the Great Depression, which is overly dramatic. Yes, the rates are high, the highest since 1933. But the context is entirely different. One economist, Gary Richardson, is clear that tariffs didn't cause the Great Depression. It was a unique catastrophe.
Aura Windfall
That's a relief to hear, but it doesn't mean there are no consequences. Another expert said a 25% tariff will "definitely make us poorer" and likely lead to net job losses. So, while it's not the Great Depression, it's still a path that will create economic hardship for many.
Mask
Hardship is a component of change. The administration’s policy evolved. In January 2025, the focus turned to our closest neighbors, Canada and Mexico. Tariffs threatened the highly integrated North American auto supply chain, where parts cross the border multiple times for a single vehicle. A bold, disruptive move.
Aura Windfall
It seems so counterintuitive. Decades of free trade agreements built this incredible, efficient system, and suddenly, it was at risk. I remember the big automakers, Ford, GM, Stellantis, warning that this would hurt American companies. They were pleading for exemptions. Their voices spoke of deep concern.
Mask
Their concern was for their quarterly profits, not for the long-term health of the nation's industrial base. The administration's view is that trade deficits are a wound that needs to be cauterized. Economists can criticize that as a "flawed understanding," but it's a decisive stance against a system they see as broken.
Aura Windfall
And this decisive stance has had a real impact on global confidence. The Federal Reserve, the OECD, the World Bank—they all downgraded GDP growth projections because of these policies. It shows how one nation's choices can send waves across the entire global economy. We are all in this together.
Mask
Then came the 2025 "reciprocal" tariffs. A baseline of 10% on most partners, but higher for those with significant trade surpluses with the U.S. The EU, Japan, Brazil, India—everyone was brought to the negotiating table. The strategy is to force a rebalancing of trade, country by country.
Aura Windfall
It sounds so complex, with different rates and exemptions for different countries and products. Steel and aluminum tariffs were expanded. New tariffs were planned for autos, semiconductors, and even pharmaceuticals. It must be incredibly difficult for businesses to navigate this shifting landscape. The ground is constantly moving beneath their feet.
Mask
That's the point. It creates uncertainty, which forces companies to rethink their supply chains. It's a high-stakes pressure test. If these tariffs hold, they're projected to raise $2.3 trillion in revenue over a decade and could reduce GDP by nearly a percentage point. It's the largest tax hike since 1993.
Aura Windfall
A tax hike paid for by consumers in the form of higher prices. It all comes back to that. It’s a grand economic strategy on one hand, and on the other, it’s a family deciding if they can afford a new pair of shoes or if the price of their groceries will stretch their budget too thin.
Mask
And it's a bet that the long-term gain of a stronger domestic manufacturing sector is worth the short-term cost to the consumer. It's a calculated risk. The global supply chain was due for a massive realignment. This is just the catalyst.
Aura Windfall
And this is where the conflict truly lies, isn't it? It's a clash of worldviews. On one side, you have the administration's stated goals, which are powerful and, for some, very appealing. They speak of reinforcing national security and boosting U.S. manufacturing.
Mask
Exactly. The priorities are clear. First, protect sectors critical to national security like semiconductors, steel, and pharmaceuticals. You can't be dependent on rivals for the things you need to defend yourself or keep your people healthy. It's common sense. It's strategic autonomy.
Aura Windfall
The second goal is to bring jobs back, to boost American manufacturing. There's a deep-seated belief that a strong nation is a nation that makes things. The idea is to encourage companies to move their operations back to the United States, creating a ripple effect of job growth.
Mask
And the third is balancing the scales of trade. The administration sees persistent trade deficits as a sign of unfairness—that other countries are using tariff and non-tariff barriers to their advantage. These reciprocal tariffs are a direct response. A way of saying, "We will treat you as you treat us."
Aura Windfall
But on the other side of this conflict are the businesses and economists who see a different reality. They see "radical uncertainty." Businesses are scrambling to create "geopolitical nerve centers" just to keep up. It's a massive, costly distraction from their actual work of innovating and serving customers.
Mask
Disruption is always costly for those comfortable with the old way of doing things. Companies are being forced to analyze their vulnerabilities. Are they too dependent on one country? Is their supply chain resilient? These are questions they should have been asking all along. This is a stress test for competency.
Aura Windfall
But this stress test has global implications. One economist, Greg Fuzesi, noted that while a new deal with the EU avoids singling them out, the uncertainty has a powerful effect on sentiment, which can be much larger than the direct economic impact. It's about confidence, and confidence is fragile.
Mask
Confidence is a luxury. Results are what matter. The goal is a fundamental restructuring. Bruce Kasman, another economist, pointed out that business confidence is dropping. Of course it is. Change is uncomfortable. But the initial surge of optimism had to meet the reality of hard decisions.
Aura Windfall
And what about other countries? China, for example, seems to view this very differently. The article mentions that while they engage in these bilateral talks, they believe multilateralism—working together through global institutions—is the ultimate solution. It’s a completely different philosophy. A call for harmony over conflict.
Mask
Multilateralism is often an excuse for inaction and maintaining a status quo that benefits others at our expense. It's a system that has been exploited. Direct, bilateral negotiation is about leverage and achieving clear, measurable outcomes. It's less about harmony and more about strength.
Aura Windfall
So we have this incredible tension: a vision of national strength through protectionism versus a vision of global cooperation. And caught in the middle are the businesses trying to plan for a future that seems to change by the day, and the consumers who ultimately bear the cost.
Aura Windfall
And the impact of this is already taking shape. It’s not just theoretical anymore. We're seeing real consequences for people's wallets and for the economy as a whole. What I know for sure is that economic policy is never just about numbers; it's about lives.
Mask
The numbers are stark. Projections show these tariffs could boost consumer prices by 1 to 1.5 percent this year. That might not sound like a lot, but it erodes purchasing power. It could lead to negative real income growth and a contraction in consumer spending. That's a significant headwind.
Aura Windfall
A headwind that could feel like a gale force to many families. Think about that in concrete terms: your paycheck stays the same, but everything you buy gets more expensive. That’s a painful squeeze. It forces difficult choices between needs and wants. The spirit of abundance feels further away.
Mask
It's a necessary correction. For years, prices were artificially low due to imbalanced trade. On the global scale, the estimate is that a 10% universal tariff and 110% on China could shave a full percentage point off global GDP. It’s a global reset, and the U.S. is leading it.
Aura Windfall
And it’s creating such volatility. The risk of a global recession has reportedly risen to 40% because of this. That’s a sobering statistic. It highlights how interconnected we are. The impact isn't just contained within our borders; it ripples outwards, affecting everyone. It’s a powerful reminder of our shared destiny.
Mask
That risk is magnified by sentiment, not just direct costs. As Bruce Kasman noted, the drag on sentiment as businesses reassess the landscape can be more damaging than the tariffs themselves. But weak businesses that rely on sentiment over fundamentals are the ones that will be culled from the herd.
Aura Windfall
That sounds so harsh. But I understand the logic, even if my heart aches for the people affected. We're seeing specific industries, like automotives, facing enormous pressure. A 25% tariff on auto parts could raise car prices by over 11%. That's thousands of dollars for a new vehicle.
Mask
Which pressures foreign automakers to absorb the cost or move production here. And it gives domestic manufacturers room to raise prices without losing market share. It’s a strategic move to re-level the playing field in a critical sector. It's not about being harsh; it's about being competitive.
Aura Windfall
So, as we look to the horizon, what does the future hold? It feels like we're navigating a storm, and everyone wants to know when we'll see clear skies. Is there a path forward that leads to stability and maybe even a new kind of prosperity?
Mask
The future is a landscape of negotiation. We're seeing deals being hammered out. The U.S. and the EU agreed to a 15% tariff, with key exceptions. Japan agreed to a 15% rate. Vietnam, 20%. Brazil got hit with 50%. It's a dynamic process of finding a new equilibrium.
Aura Windfall
And what about China? The article mentions a 90-day reprieve, a temporary reduction in the massive tariff rates. It feels like a small opening for dialogue, a chance to find common ground. What I know for sure is that communication is the first step toward resolution.
Mask
It's a temporary truce, not a peace treaty. The bar for a comprehensive deal remains incredibly high. A resurgence of tariff increases is still very possible. J.P. Morgan's chief China economist said we shouldn't rule it out. This is a long game of strategic pressure.
Aura Windfall
So, the uncertainty continues. It seems the consensus is that even with these deals, the overall tariff situation will be worse than it was before this all began. One analyst said it will likely cause "inflationary pain for the consumer." That feels like a difficult truth to accept.
Mask
That's the end of today's discussion. The key takeaway is that these tariffs are a fundamental shock to the global system, designed to force a realignment of manufacturing and trade. The short-term costs are clear, but the long-term gains are the objective.
Aura Windfall
Indeed. It's a story of disruption and its human impact. Thank you for listening to Goose Pod. We hope this conversation helps you navigate these changing times with a little more clarity and heart. See you tomorrow.

## New Tariffs Poised to Increase Prices for American Consumers This report from **The Washington Post**, authored by **Abha Bhattarai and Jaclyn Peiser**, details the significant impact of the Trump administration's latest round of tariffs on American consumers and businesses. The tariffs, which took effect at midnight on Thursday, have pushed the average U.S. tariff rate to its highest level since the Great Depression, signaling a shift from tentative to permanent trade policy. ### Key Findings and Conclusions: * **Broad Price Increases Expected:** Americans are already paying more for appliances, home furnishings, toys, and shoes, and are likely to face higher prices on a wider range of goods as businesses begin to pass on increased import costs. * **Tariffs as a Permanent Fixture:** The administration's trade policy is now seen as permanent, prompting businesses to adjust their pricing strategies accordingly. As Professor Justin Wolfers of the University of Michigan states, "You’re going to start seeing higher prices as soon as businesses become convinced this will stick around, and that clock starts today." * **Significant Consumer Cost:** Households are estimated to face an average annual cost increase of **$2,400** due to these tariffs, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. * **Specific Sector Impacts:** * **Clothing and Footwear:** Price increases of **39%** for leather shoes and bags and **37%** for clothing are anticipated. Even after long-term adjustments, prices could remain elevated by nearly **20%**. * **Food:** Food prices could rise by more than **3%**, with fresh produce becoming **7%** more expensive. * **Automobiles:** Cars are expected to become **12%** more expensive, adding an estimated **$6,000** to the price of an average new vehicle. Cars assembled in Japan could see a **9%** increase (**$3,010**), while those assembled in Mexico could face the highest hikes at around **10%** (**$3,550**). * **Business Response:** While businesses initially absorbed tariff costs, this is changing as retailers deplete earlier stockpiles. Companies like Walmart, Nike, and Procter & Gamble are already implementing price increases. Procter & Gamble, for instance, plans to raise prices by approximately **2.5%** on some products to offset **$1 billion** in tariff costs. * **Toy Industry Hit Hard:** The toy industry, which imports over **75%** of its products from China, has been among the first to pass on costs. Toy prices rose **3.2%** between April and June, significantly outpacing overall inflation of **0.4%** during the same period. * **Overall Tariff Rate:** The average effective tariff rate for Americans has reached **18.6%**, the highest since **1933**. At the beginning of the year, this rate was between **2% to 3%**. * **Economic Slowdown Concerns:** Economists are observing slowing economic growth, pullbacks in business spending, hiring, and investment, and households holding back on spending due to the uncertainty. * **Automaker Burden and Shift:** Carmakers like General Motors have absorbed over **$1 billion** in tariff costs, impacting profit margins and prompting some operational shifts. Despite this, the cost of new vehicles in June rose by **1.2%** year-over-year to **$48,907**, which is below the average 10-year increase of **3.9%**. * **Manufacturing Challenges:** For industries like toys, relocating manufacturing from China is deemed unrealistic due to lower labor costs and established infrastructure and expertise. * **Trade Uncertainty:** Businesses face significant uncertainty, with some, like gear manufacturer Gear Motions, unsure of the exact tariff rates they will face on imported components, leading to difficulties in pricing and sales. ### Key Statistics and Metrics: * **Highest Tariff Rate Since:** The Great Depression * **Average Annual Consumer Cost Increase:** $2,400 * **Leather Shoes and Bags Price Increase:** 39% * **Clothing Cost Increase:** 37% * **Long-Run Price Elevation for Clothing/Footwear:** Nearly 20% * **Food Price Increase:** More than 3% * **Fresh Produce Price Increase:** 7% * **Car Price Increase:** 12% (adding $6,000 to average new vehicle price) * **Tariff Rate on Brazil and India:** Up to 50% * **Tariff Rate on European Union and Japan:** 15% * **Procter & Gamble Price Increase:** ~2.5% * **Procter & Gamble Tariff Costs:** $1 billion this year * **Toy Imports from China:** More than 75% * **Toy Price Increase (April-June):** 3.2% * **Overall Inflation (April-June):** 0.4% * **Goods from China Costlier Since First Tariffs:** ~4% * **Projected Cost Increase for Goods from China by Year-End:** ~10% * **Overall Average Effective Tariff Rate:** 18.6% (highest since 1933) * **Average Tariffs at Beginning of Year:** 2% to 3% * **General Motors Tariff Costs (Latest Quarter):** More than $1 billion * **New Vehicle Cost Increase (June Year-over-Year):** 1.2% to $48,907 * **Average 10-Year Increase in Vehicle Cost:** 3.9% * **Price Hike for Cars Assembled in Japan:** 9% ($3,010) * **Price Hike for Cars Assembled in Mexico:** ~10% ($3,550) * **Gear Motions Import Percentage:** 5% * **Gear Motions International Inquiry Decrease:** ~50% ### Notable Risks or Concerns: * **Consumer Affordability:** The significant projected price increases raise concerns about consumer affordability and purchasing power. * **Business Viability:** Small businesses, like Sharon Azula's plush toy and book company, face difficult decisions about whether they can absorb costs or if price increases will deter customers, potentially impacting their ability to continue operations. * **Economic Impact:** Economists warn against the notion that there will be no economic impact, highlighting potential slowdowns in growth, business spending, and hiring. * **Uncertainty in Trade Talks:** Ongoing trade talks, particularly with China, add a layer of uncertainty for businesses. The report underscores that while some dramatic tariff proposals are still under consideration, the current measures are already leading to tangible price increases and economic adjustments across various sectors.

Cars, coffee and clothing are poised to get pricier with new tariffs

Read original at News Source

Americans are paying more for appliances, home furnishings, toys and shoes than they were a few months ago, and they could soon face higher prices on more goods as the Trump administration’s latest round of sharper tariffs kicks in.The newest round of duties took effect at midnight Thursday, lifting the average U.

S. tariff rate to its highest level since the Great Depression. The move solidifies the president’s trade policy after months of negotiations, meaning more manufacturers and retailers are expected to begin raising prices in short order.“Tariffs have moved from being tentative to permanent — and that changes how American businesses are going to respond,” said Justin Wolfers, a professor of public policy and economics at the University of Michigan.

“You’re going to start seeing higher prices as soon as businesses become convinced this will stick around, and that clock starts today.”The higher tariffs, which businesses — not countries — pay to the federal government to import goods, are as high as 50 percent for Brazil and India, but just 15 percent for the European Union and Japan.

For consumers, that escalation is expected to result in higher prices, costing households an average of $2,400 per year, according to estimates from the Budget Lab at Yale University. Americans are likely to face large markups on clothing in the coming months, including a 39 percent increase in prices for leather shoes and bags, and a 37 percent rise in clothing costs, the research center found.

Even after long-run supply chain adjustments and buying shifts, those prices could remain elevated by nearly 20 percent.Food prices, meanwhile, could rise more than 3 percent, while fresh produce could become 7 percent more expensive as a result of the Trump administration’s tariffs, the Budget Lab found.

The center also expects cars — which often rely on components from several different countries — to get 12 percent more expensive, adding $6,000 to the price of an average new vehicle.Although businesses have so far absorbed the brunt of new tariffs, by covering higher costs themselves or relying on earlier stockpiles of inventory to keep them going, that is quickly changing.

Major retailers, including Costco, Williams-Sonoma and Target, that loaded up on products earlier in the year are beginning to deplete those reserves, analysts say.“Consumers are going to pay, starting with their morning coffee,” said Robert Blecker, an economics professor at American University, referring to the 50 percent tariff on coffee from Brazil.

“Although it does seem a lot of firms have been eating some of the tariffs by shaving their profit margins and holding the line on prices, that can’t go on forever.”Walmart, the country’s largest retailer, has begun marking up baby gear, kitchenware and toys. Nike is raising prices on some of its shoes, and many others are beginning to warn consumers that price increases are around the corner.

Procter & Gamble, the maker of Tide laundry detergent, Pampers diapers and Oral-B toothbrushes, said it would start raising prices in August on some products by about 2.5 percent to help offset $1 billion in tariff costs this year.Sharon Azula, who owns a company that sells plush toys and books, had enough inventory to fill orders through much of this year.

But now she is preparing to stock up for the holidays, which means she will have to pay an extra 30 percent on merchandise from China, translating to markups for customers. Adding to the uncertainty: Ongoing trade talks between the U.S. and China.“We know we’re going to have to raise our prices at some point,” said Azula, who founded the Tooth Brigade with her husband in 2019.

“If our $16 plush suddenly costs more than $20, are consumers still going to buy it? We can’t pay for the increase ourselves, but we also don’t know if we can keep moving forward with our business.”The toy industry, which imports more than 75 percent of its products from China, has been among the first to pass on higher costs from the president’s trade war.

Toy prices rose by 3.2 percent between April and June, far outpacing overall inflation of 0.4 percent in that period, federal data shows.The president says higher tariffs are needed to combat other countries’ unfair trade practices, which have hollowed out American manufacturing and cost millions of factory workers their jobs.

By erecting new barriers to foreign products, Trump aims to promote domestic manufacturing while ushering in what he calls a new “Golden Age.”Yet, for products like toys, moving manufacturing out of China is not realistic, said Greg Ahearn, president and chief executive of the Toy Association, a trade group.

Not only is labor cheaper in China, but for decades, the country also has built up an infrastructure of “manufacturing expertise and the ethical manufacturing process at the factories,” he said. Everything from final packaging to materials such as springs, motors and plastic parts “can’t be replicated here in the U.

S.”An analysis of recent prices from the country’s four largest retailers shows that goods from China have gotten roughly 4 percent costlier since the Trump administration’s first tariffs took hold this year, according to Alberto Cavallo, a professor at Harvard Business School and co-director of its Pricing Lab.

He expects those costs to be up about 10 percent by the end of the year.Americans now face an overall average effective tariff rate of 18.6 percent, the highest since 1933, according to calculations from the Budget Lab.“We had 2 to 3 percent average tariffs at the beginning of this year,” said Şebnem Kalemli-Özcan, an economics professor at Brown University.

“It is foolish to think there isn’t going to be any economic impact, or that this is going to be all pink and rosy for the American people.”Economists are just beginning to understand how new trade policies are affecting prices, consumer demand and business decisions across the country. The latest data points to slowing economic growth in the first half of the year, as well as pullbacks in business spending, hiring and investment.

Households, too, are holding tight as they wait to see how things unfold.Still, inflationary effects have so far been limited to specific categories and have yet to translate to higher across-the-board prices for many families. Some of the administration’s most dramatic proposals, including tariffs of 100 percent on chips and semiconductors, and up to 145 percent on Chinese imports, are still in the air.

Carmakers have so far shouldered much of import costs themselves instead of passing them onto consumers. General Motors last month said tariffs had cost the company more than $1 billion in the latest quarter, cutting into its profit margins and prompting the company to move some operations to the United States.

The cost of a new vehicle in June rose 1.2 percent year-over-year to $48,907, below the average 10-year increase of 3.9 percent, according to Kelley Blue Book.But the new round of tariffs is expected to make cars pricier, especially those assembled in Mexico and Japan. Consumers will pay an extra 9 percent, or $3,010, for cars assembled in Japan, including for some Toyota models, such as the Prius and the 4Runner, according to Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive.

Cars assembled in Mexico will see the highest price hikes — about 10 percent, or $3,550 — according to Cox. Those include the Honda Fit, the Chevrolet Equinox and the Ford Maverick.In Upstate New York, gear manufacturer Gear Motions began raising prices to offset tariffs earlier this year. Although imports make up just 5 percent of the company’s business, trade uncertainty has complicated just about every part of the firm’s operations, President Dean Burrows said.

The company’s gears are used in air compressors, superchargers and car transmissions.Anxious customers are buying less. And it has gotten harder to sell his U.S.-made products overseas; international inquiries have dried up by about 50 percent, he said, as buyers in other countries look for ways to bypass American manufacturers.

“We’re a 140-year-old company and have survived many ups and downs, but the uncertainty right now is what’s unprecedented,” he said. “We have precision gears on the ocean, coming from Italy and I still don’t know whether I’ll have to pay a 15 percent tariff, or 27.5 percent. But either way, we have no choice: We’ll pay it, and we’ll pass it on.

”Julian Mark contributed to this report.

Analysis

Conflict+
Related Info+
Core Event+
Background+
Impact+
Future+

Related Podcasts